Under dc deeps handle it says "Senior Member" not temp ban or banned????
I banned DC_DEEP after I thought I'd dotted all the i's and crossed all the t's but I later found that I was in error.
DC_ had, at the urging of Freddie53, stopped posting so that the pie fight he was embroiled in would end.
My action was wrong. I have PM'd DC_ with my apology and his membership has been restored.
That's used to not allow people to cause flame wars with their various ID's. Seems quite simple: Post one ideas as A, then post as B, disagreeing vehemently.
And drag others into it.
But why not???
What is so wrong about that?
Is it any more wrong to pose-and-defend an idea than to pose-and-depose that same idea?
Is a flame war any more mentally destructive than the intellectual rigor mortis that sets in after reading a hundred boring threads about locker room towel ettitquette? (Personally, I rather enjoyed Snoozan's posting about lesbians in the locker room.)
Why do we keep pretending that this online fantasy world has to pretend to match reality??
That's an interesting hypothetical question. If I were a mod I'd consider reversing it given the circumstances; can't say if I would or wouldn't.My question would be that if Snoozan/WoB wanted to return, would her ban be lifted by the mods? After all, she left in protest, not knowing that the event that prompted her protest was a moderator's error.
But why not???
What is so wrong about that?
Is it any more wrong to pose-and-defend an idea than to pose-and-depose that same idea?
Is a flame war any more mentally destructive than the intellectual rigor mortis that sets in after reading a hundred boring threads about locker room towel ettitquette? (Personally, I rather enjoyed Snoozan's posting about lesbians in the locker room.)
Why do we keep pretending that this online fantasy world has to pretend to match reality??
My question would be that if Snoozan/WoB wanted to return, would her ban be lifted by the mods? After all, she left in protest, not knowing that the event that prompted her protest was a moderator's error.
Seems to me that if the admin team wants to smooth the ripples caused by DC_DEEP's ban-in-error, they should also restore anyone who was upset enough to leave over it.
Yet another totally wrong judgment call...uhm. No they didn't. He jumped to a lot of conclusions about someone that did not disagree with them. He's an ass. Good riddance. It's his choice to leave. He can gossip and stir the pot on another site. Fucknut.
I agree, esp with what he called her. Her last post warrants it.I forgot to add that you are probably biased as he called you a stupid cunt. I've not seen DC take many to task on here but I've never disagreed with him when he has.
In many ways,some of you have got yourselves to blame,for making lpsg your own personal home away from home.
When you feel one of yr beloved kin has been wronged, you come out with Guns blazing in support.
Nothing wrong with that...but
When there is a 19 year old genuinely asking a reasonable question
My GF says her x had a bigger cock than me' (or something similar) where were all these 1000 or more posters who could have given him advice and support
Only one person with significant posts was there
Were many of you avoiding his Question.possibly preferring to interact,as many of you have so become accustomed to....
Maybe we need a "Who gives a flying fuck" thread... There's nearly 300,000 members here last time I looked.
Once again, poor you. Yet another victim.Manly, some of us had nasty experiences with these people too.
I agree. If DCDeep was not banned it error to begin with she would not have posted with her old account.
Even is she is not coming back they should offer her WoB account back to her.
They (mods and Admins) should also disable old accounts (or change the passwords) so that members can not do what she did.
One small issue. She broke TOS in order to be banned. Peace.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.