Disadvantages of being uncut?

Probably the answer to that is just ask the guy to demonstrate how he does himself for a few seconds and then copy that.
That’s exactly how it played out. One of them finally said, “Just do this” and gave a quick demonstration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DildoShwaggins
I suspect some closet resentment is being masked as hate as a coping mechanism.

I'm not sure I would go that far but I do think some guys who are cut feel better if they believe there are real practical advantages rather than that it being a purely cosmetic procedure and therefore continue to assert advantages that are best marginal and at worst non-existent and certainly not worth going under the knife for however minor the operation.

I think it is time to admit that it is a cosmetic preference, and I have no issue with adults engaging in body modification for cosmetic reasons, but in the same way I would not want to see baby tattooed or fitted with ear rings or a Prince Albert, so I'd like to see baby boys left alone to choose if and what they want in body modification when they're old enough to understand.
 
And what did he do? :)
His foreskin was really short so it was very similar to jerking a circumcised dick. The big exception was to not touch the head at all. I’m still waiting for the day when I can jack with a guy with a long foreskin.
 
I'm not sure I would go that far but I do think some guys who are cut feel better if they believe there are real practical advantages rather than that it being a purely cosmetic procedure and therefore continue to assert advantages that are best marginal and at worst non-existent and certainly not worth going under the knife for however minor the operation.

I think it is time to admit that it is a cosmetic preference, and I have no issue with adults engaging in body modification for cosmetic reasons, but in the same way I would not want to see baby tattooed or fitted with ear rings or a Prince Albert, so I'd like to see baby boys left alone to choose if and what they want in body modification when they're old enough to understand.
Perhaps it’s too far. I can tell you though, with how I feel about not having the choice, being circed as well as being born premature, and feeling wronged. It would be a hell of a lot easier to be ignorant about it instead of accepting what was done, was done for no real reason and it would have been better to have been left intact, for sexual as well as mental health.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
His foreskin was really short so it was very similar to jerking a circumcised dick. The big exception was to not touch the head at all. I’m still waiting for the day when I can jack with a guy with a long foreskin.
:) :)

I play with a short skinned guy occasionally. He looks like me when hard. It was eye opening :)
 
I'm not sure I would go that far but I do think some guys who are cut feel better if they believe there are real practical advantages rather than that it being a purely cosmetic procedure and therefore continue to assert advantages that are best marginal and at worst non-existent and certainly not worth going under the knife for however minor the operation.

I think it is time to admit that it is a cosmetic preference, and I have no issue with adults engaging in body modification for cosmetic reasons, but in the same way I would not want to see baby tattooed or fitted with ear rings or a Prince Albert, so I'd like to see baby boys left alone to choose if and what they want in body modification when they're old enough to understand.
and totally agree.
 
When I was a bit younger, in my 20s, I wanted to be circumcised. I had been watching a lot of US-made porn and of course all the guys were cut, so all the erect dicks I'd seen were cut. I wanted to emulate that. Added to which, a hero of my teenage years, Italian porn star Rocco Siffredi, who had started his career uncut, underwent a circumcision. I wanted to emulate him too. If it is done well, the circumcised cock can look very beautiful, no doubt about it.

I also noticed that, when I was fucking, on the 'withdrawal' stroke, my foreskin sometimes slipped back to cover the head of my cock, thus depriving me of the intense stimulation of my glans having direct contact with my partner's body. This would not be a problem for cut guys. But, with practice, I altered my technique to prevent this happening.

I held onto my foreskin, so to speak, and now I am glad I did so. It needs a bit of care, but I enjoy the ritual of washing the head of my cock. It feels good, it is not a chore for me. The 'skin keeps the head protected and moist, and stops it drying out too much. Whether mine is any more sensitive than a cut guy's, I'll never know.

When I see guys on here with very tight foreskins I feel a bit uncomfortable. A big erect dick straining to be free of its foreskin can look painful to me. Maybe some guys can't fully retract their foreskin, which is a pity 'cos they are missing the intense pleasure of directly stimulating the glans. Maybe it doesn't bother them, or maybe they are too shy to consult a doctor. I think a simple, partial 'snip' can loosen the skin without removing it.

Whatever, I love 'em all - cut or uncut.


Are you sure about Rocco?
Because he looks uncircumcised.
I watched his documentary recently which opens with a scene of his enormous dick and it is definitely uncut.

Maybe he was just partially circumcised??
 
Reading the various answers, I noticed that there is a recurring discussion about hygiene. In my opinion, a circumcised penis is (only) potentially cleaner than one that is uncircumcised. This for at least three reasons: 1) the glans is always exposed and in contact with air and this reduces the possible formation of odors; 2) it is practically impossible for the glans not to be washed during the shower because the water with soap, even if indirectly, will inevitably wet it; 3) urination is logically done with the glans uncovered with no chance that residual drops of urine (which cause humidity and stink) remain trapped. However, all these "practices" can also be performed by those who are not circumcised, in which case the elimination of the foreskin is not directly related to penile hygiene...
 
  • Like
Reactions: dunk89
Are you sure about Rocco?
Because he looks uncircumcised.
I watched his documentary recently which opens with a scene of his enormous dick and it is definitely uncut.

Maybe he was just partially circumcised??

I remember reading about it - possibly in an interview with Buttman aka John Stagliano, who worked a lot with Rocco at that time. Whoever it was said Rocco had problems afterwards because he kept getting boners which ripped the stitches on his cut foreskin, and he had to have it re-stitched. Ouch! Maybe that's why it's best done in infants, if done at all.

I'll go back and have a closer look at the evidence. I may be gone for some time....
 
  • Like
Reactions: CJF88 and iluvmen
Are you sure about Rocco?
Because he looks uncircumcised.
I watched his documentary recently which opens with a scene of his enormous dick and it is definitely uncut.

Maybe he was just partially circumcised??

This from a website called Mother Jones. Can't vouch for the provenance of the information but it shows the story is kind of out there and accepted:

"Anti-circ groups routinely claim that cut men feel less pleasure, since they lack about 15 square inches of sensitive tissue. Adult film star Rocco Siffredi (nom de guerre: Italian Stallion) says he found that out the hard way when he was circumcised at 31 for hygiene reasons. Siffredi, who calls his decision “catastrophic,” says that with a foreskin, “you can feel much more fun.”

Much Ado About Cutting
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvmen
I used to be uncut until about 10 years ago. I had a lot of skin, too much. The other problem I have is that I precum a lot, by just thinking sexy stuff. So, with skin folded over, precum would collect inside and A lot of it. Then I would love a certain way and skin would unfold dumping a load of precum in my pants. It would look like I peed myself. I hated the skin. So, I got It all chopped off and I'm loving it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CJF88
I used to be uncut until about 10 years ago. I had a lot of skin, too much. The other problem I have is that I precum a lot, by just thinking sexy stuff. So, with skin folded over, precum would collect inside and A lot of it. Then I would love a certain way and skin would unfold dumping a load of precum in my pants. It would look like I peed myself. I hated the skin.

Man, I wish I had these "problems" :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvmen
I get hairs trapped in the foreskin when I get a semi and haven’t trimmed for a good few weeks. Hate that.

Same, mostly when I work out..Since I tend to shrink a bit...So I'm adjusting myself trying to be "discreet".. because I feel my foreskin start Swallowing my pubes.... But then again I'm a pretty hairy guy, rocking that 70's porn style bush since I was young.. I'm 35 now... so you can imagine.
 
I collect lint from new boxers or briefs. Rubbing that off prior to getting head can be an interruption lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted1074299
Ever since I managed to pull my foreskin all the way back the first time I've never gone back. I was in my late teens and, yes, there was a lot of smegma and it smelled. It has accumulated over years and looking back I expect nothing less than what I found. No, I've never had the problem again since. I've kept it clean under the hood, thoroughly cleaning the glans every time I shower.

Other than the probability of having a smelly dick if the hygiene standard drops I see no other disadvantage of remaining uncut.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4skinuncutfrench
Be careful what you wish for. It’s sounds like a fun problem to have once before it gets frustrating.
It dries afterwards. I would love to have a long foreskin that collect so much precum drippring off the glans. What a pleasure.