Do you prefer fucking pussy or guy's hole?

[Lakeshore]

Married to a woman for 43 yrs, and she has a fantastic pussy, so I'm going with preferring women's pussy over a man's hole. It is close on preference, and I do enjoy fucking guys, but women are a bigger turn-on.

 

[678wsb]

Well, when you pose the question in such a romantic and intimate way, who couldn't resist answering -- or throwing up a little in one's own mouth.

New to the site?

 

[Robert Dole]

New to the site?

No, he is just the resident attention seeker and general fuckwit

 

[FrankieGuile]

New to the site?

New enough to still be repulsed by misogynist sentiments but not so new to be surprised by them.

 

[678wsb]

New enough to still be repulsed by misogynist sentiments but not so new to be surprised by them.

I'm failing to see what's misogynistic.

 

[JD_002]

I'm failing to see what's misogynistic.

Ignore him, this guy is the worst.

 

[Robert Dole]

Ignore him, this guy is the worst.

Don't touch the tar baby...

 

[daftman]

he seems, a bit negative, eh?

 

[FrankieGuile]

I'm failing to see what's misogynistic.

Again, I'm not surprised.

 

[WilliamG]

Folks... We're are on a sex site. So why..? Just why do the male etiquette police have to pipe in? The OP's question was valid. It's so easy to scroll past. And sure I could just scroll past the rebuttals myself... But I see these types of comments and think it's not a friendly or fun thing to say to others here. Life is rough. Let's just have some fun here. This place should be a vacation from the other social media argument sites. Peace.

 

[WilliamG]

Having sex with a man is much different than sex with a woman. It's two different experiences. As if you are comparing apples to oranges. There are certain things that I prefer about women and certain things that I prefer about men. But not one over the other...for me anyway.

Well said.

 

[Perano]

A woman’s ass for me.

 

[Jacksbiguncutcock]

I prefer pussy by far but men suck cock better than women.

 

[CoburnAisling]

New enough to still be repulsed by misogynist sentiments but not so new to be surprised by them.

You're mistaking tone-deafness for misogyny, my guy. Clumsy language is not equivalent to sexism.

Physical-first sex talk is a healthy, valid way to discuss our bodies as humans, so long as everyone in the conversation is consenting. Equating that talk to sexism is also incorrect. The fact that many men have forced that kind of talk onto non-consenting parties as a means of control does not make that talk itself unhealthy, it makes those men toxic. Once consent is regained, it is an excellent way to learn more about sex and anatomy without shame or judgment.

 

[Menulis]

Folks... We're are on a sex site. So why..? Just why do the male etiquette police have to pipe in?

New to the internet?

 

[WilliamG]

New to the internet?

No. But LPSG is generally better than most other places around for dialog.

 

[Menulis]

No. But LPSG is generally better than most other places around for dialog.

 

[WilliamG]

View attachment 132325941

It's moderated here. Unlike the rest of the world. Hats off to the mods.

 

[FrankieGuile]

You're mistaking tone-deafness for misogyny, my guy. Clumsy language is not equivalent to sexism.

Physical-first sex talk is a healthy, valid way to discuss our bodies as humans, so long as everyone in the conversation is consenting. Equating that talk to sexism is also incorrect. The fact that many men have forced that kind of talk onto non-consenting parties as a means of control does not make that talk itself unhealthy, it makes those men toxic. Once consent is regained, it is an excellent way to learn more about sex and anatomy without shame or judgment.

I like the point you make -- I don't agree, but I like it. I like it because it implies responsibility for the user of words. The reason I do not agree is because words convey meaning which can denigrate the listener and discredit the user. I do not separate the user from the words he chooses to use. Use of such words are, de facto, unhealthy and other words can be used to convey a "healthier" meaning. None of that implies people cannot use the words they choose. It just means they are not immune to criticism of misogyny or denigration.

 

[CoburnAisling]

I like the point you make -- I don't agree, but I like it. I like it because it implies responsibility for the user of words. The reason I do not agree is because words convey meaning which can denigrate the listener and discredit the user. I do not separate the user from the words he chooses to use. Use of such words are, de facto, unhealthy and other words can be used to convey a "healthier" meaning. None of that implies people cannot use the words they choose. It just means they are not immune to criticism of misogyny or denigration.

Nothing they said denigrates anyone. The title of the thread is asking for personal opinions ("which do YOU prefer," not which is better), and the rest of it is matter-of-fact talk about physical characteristics with some dopey speculation at the end about preferences. That's it. Not a single negative thing was said about any gender.

Not only that, for you to equate feminine physicality with denigration actually shows YOUR subconscious sexism. It does not denigrate women to talk about vaginas, and the term "pussy" is neither pejorative nor modern. It's been used for centuries, and its murky origins are effectively benign.

You need to step back and reevaluate.