Female orgasm being banned in uk porn. female led porn has taken a hit.

Sort by date Most Liked Posts
NottsBound

NottsBound

Cherished Member
Media: 5
Joined
May 29, 2010
Posts
386
Media
5
Likes
365
Points
208
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
«The AVMS regulations are about patriarchal institutions trying to enforce a heteronormative, kink-phobic sexuality,” she said earlier this year.

“Banning face-sitting but not deep-throat reveals a deep-seated misogyny that is suspicious of female sexual dominance and female pleasure.

Banning squirting but not cum shots reveals the patriarchal belief that only men should gain pleasure from sex, and male visible orgasm is fine but female visible orgasm is obscene.»http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsand...-new-laws-could-destroy-queer-female-led-porn
 
  • Like
Reactions: merc41, dreamer20, Heat and 1 other person
"The UK government has quietly proposed a new clause in the Digital Economy Bill which, if passed, would see “non-conventional” sex acts blocked by UK Internet service providers. These acts are yet to be officially defined, but the language already mirrors a law passed by David Cameron in 2014, which saw the filming of face-sitting, spanking, fisting and female ejaculation outlawed in the UK. Although not confirmed, it’s logical to assume that this new clause would aim to eradicate these same apparently “non-conventional” acts."

My concern is on the bolded portion. The reason is that the David Cameron law actually bans the following:

"Spanking

Caning

Aggressive whipping

Penetration by any object "associated with violence"

Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual)

Urolagnia (known as "water sports")

Role-playing as non-adults

Physical restraint

Humiliation

Female ejaculation

Strangulation

Facesitting

Fisting"

Looking at it from a non-biased viewpoint only two of the list actually effect "females only" and of those two facesitting is widely accepted as being a power BDSM behavior instead of simply cunnilingus which falls in line with the top three. These also only fall in line with what is produced; the new law would have a difficult time ensuring that ISPs do more than block websites dedicated to the above but ultimately cannot prevent access to the content entirely. I can see where they got the female ejaculation from too, as it is tied to urolagnia, but whether or not that moral judgment should have been made is questionable. I'm also unsure where "fisting" came in.
 
what the hell is nonaggressive whipping?

this is bullshit
I'm not exactly in the boat of assuming it's mysoginst but I'm in clear view that it's bullshit!
 
btw I don't think this is a purely womens issue, most of my favorite porn is out!
Cytherea is like my favorite!
and of course a good spanking vid
if I ever go to the UK I wont be able to jack off my whole time there, this is terrible
 
  • Like
Reactions: dreamer20
Symphonic said:
"Spanking

Caning

Aggressive whipping

Penetration by any object "associated with violence"

Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of if consensual)

Urolagnia (known as "water sports")

Role-playing as non-adults

Physical restraint

Humiliation

Female ejaculation

Strangulation

Facesitting

Fisting"
Click to expand...
Of that list, banning "humiliation" is also very open to interpretation.

And "physical restraint" is something so normal that even the most vanilla and conservative hetero couples these days might experiment with a pair of furry handcuffs, and it does no harm, so why the blanket ban of everything?

I don't even watch much porn but this is an obviously bad precedent.

These are the same people protecting Prince Andrew from prosecution for having sex with teenage sex slaves. Nasty hypocritical deviants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dreamer20
BiggerDickThanGod said:
Of that list, banning "humiliation" is also very open to interpretation.

And "physical restraint" is something so normal that even the most vanilla and conservative hetero couples these days might experiment with a pair of furry handcuffs, and it does no harm, so why the blanket ban of everything?

I don't even watch much porn but this is an obviously bad precedent.

These are the same people protecting Prince Andrew from prosecution for having sex with teenage sex slaves. Nasty hypocritical deviants.
Click to expand...

I imagine what the "silent" end-goal is would be a reduction in exposure may produce a reduction in curiosity. Perhaps, if you think of it this way, the light BDSM in the modern bedroom might come from porn rather than porn simply following and providing what is wanted. In turn banning certain acts, while it may seem counterintuitive and a violation of rights, from being produced may in fact lower certain types of incidents which may be problematic in the society. This isn't really the logic behind other mediums such as fantasy mediums like videogames; people really do try this stuff and sometimes with disastrous results because they cannot actually separate fantasy from reality.

I am not saying people are dumb I am saying that a professional studio shooting a scene of staged rape is a hell of a lot different than trying to stage a rape in the home. So much more can go wrong and there's no crew on hand or cash to be paid if any of it does.

Obviously I don't need to explain this with humiliation (psychological effects can ruin couples permanently), asphyxation, any of the more intense violent practices in BDSM, the complete lack of cleanliness in "real" urolagia, etc.
 
NottsBound said:
Banning squirting but not cum shots reveals the patriarchal belief that only men should gain pleasure from sex, and male visible orgasm is fine but female visible orgasm is obscene.
Click to expand...

Curious. As far as squirting scenes in porn specifically (I'm not talking about squirting in RL in the bedroom).... roughly what percentage do you think are real female ejaculations and what percentage do you think are women pissing?
 
twoton said:
Banning orgasm in porn? Women all over Britain are probably breathing a sigh of relief. I can only imagine how tiresome it is to try to fake it as well as the porn actresses.
Click to expand...
Faking is easy, the real thing is way tougher! :p

I could fake one right now, but it might scare the cat.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Holly Doors, GallusMeus, dreamer20 and 2 others
twoton said:
Banning orgasm in porn? Women all over Britain are probably breathing a sigh of relief. I can only imagine how tiresome it is to try to fake it as well as the porn actresses.
Click to expand...

There isn't a ban on orgasms so far as I know.

There is a ban on squirting scenes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: merc41
I can imagine a law allowing males to orgasm but "no ejaculating". This is an unfortunate truth in many US male prisons, masturbation to ejaculation is not allowed. Texas as well a few other states is considering a general ban on male masturbation as a "right to life" issue (destroying sperm). Try and convince a woman who ejaculates to have orgasms without the ejaculate. She can't do it anymore than a man can. Seems quite a ridiculous a law in the UK. . All should rejoice that a woman can enjoy her orgasm whichever way she does it best, ejaculating or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: merc41, dreamer20, (deleted member) and 1 other person
Is the dumbest shit I've ever heard this sounds like some stupid shit they would pass in Texas
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evenflow618
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom