How do you define hung?

nathangsm

1st Like
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Posts
27
Media
2
Likes
1
Points
146
Sexuality
No Response
Wow. I had actually used the "Quick Reply" button, but somehow, I ended up writing an essay (well, not essay FORM, but more then long enough).

Sorry about that!

But seriously, if you think that was bad, get me going on how people spend $Ks on home AV equipment, and won't pay a dime to get proper setup, calibration, or even use the proper cabling that's required to get more then a minor percentage of quality out of all their hardware!

Er, not getting started.... Off topic. Not getting started...
 

TheBeast

Just Browsing
Joined
Apr 23, 2006
Posts
55
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
151
Gender
Male
A few things from reading this thread:

I think a stats class would do some people on this board good.

Human penis size - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

research done by Lifestyles at cancun during springbreak better depicts the scene of the average penis (which if you click the top link and scroll mid way down you will find)

Length:
Image:penis frequency.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Which shows the frequency of actual measured penis length (and not E inches)

Image:penis percentile.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Or the percentiles. Which is important to note after around 8.5 is so small that it doesn't produce a percent.

Girth:
Image:penis circum.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

------------------

The point is: The reality of it is those 11, 12 inch cocks that we all see on porn, or a few that are lucky enough to have are FEW and far between. Statistically proven. So if your notion of hung is a guy with a 10 inch cock thats 7 inches around chances are you won't see them in your life. (Not that you won't get lucky, or not that you don't have a cock above the average).

But all in all, your friend has an average cock and def brought this about himself calling himself hung
 

Gisella

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2006
Posts
4,822
Media
0
Likes
118
Points
193
Location
USA
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
Okay, I can't help myself...



So, now that that's all out of the way... "Hung." It's an evocative term, certainly, and one both subjective and aesthetic. Some previous replies have mentioned horses, and certainly terms like "donkey" and "mule" have also been used to describe the so-called "well endowed." But, even taking a particular, subjective bias in regards to size and turgidity into account, could it truly be said that all men of the same proportions are therefore equally well "Hung?" Let's consider the aesthetic. Does it "dangle", or does it "swing", or does it "sway". Or is it mounted in that awkward, poky-outy way? Certainly, non-phalic genitalia play a part in this, like "low hangers" and the like, that may or may not be in any particular proportion to the member in question itself.

And then, all of THOSE considerations dually considered, let's make a further consideration in regards to form. People mention "girth", as being even more important then "length." But just like length isn't always in a straight line, girth isn't always in a perfect circle. There are those of the the ovoid and ellipse persuasion, walking among us even as we speak. But I say to you, the man with the 6" perfect circle of girth, and the 5" in in a distinct oval shape will have very different characteristics. And the shape and set of the glans. The relative looseness of the skin and/or foreskin, to the quality, distribution, and grooming of hair.

I'm not even going to DISCUSS proper usage, mechanics, style, and such. We're so fixated on sticking it in, getting it off, and then what? Was procreation your objective? Is emulating that model the only thing there is? I can tell you that MY objective has a different focus, but don't think I don't have a good understanding of the factors involved (and I'd doubt that more then a very few men even know WHAT all four female genital-erogenous zones are, let alone WHERE; anterior-fornix, anyone?).

And then, there are the women themselves, if we're taking them into consideration. They vary as well, both in terms of actual proportions, and potential ones. There's a reason the ancient vedics had "divine" guidance, with widely disseminated advice regarding the suitability of various men and women for each other, based on relative size. From my own experience, dealing with men alone, I prefer an arrangement that let's us both get in on the action, and doesn't predetermine a restricted set of activities. Axiom: If it makes me bleed out my ass, then it was too big. Consequently, there is a quickly diminishing return on the sexyness-value of increased phallic proportions. I wouldn't REJECT a man for being of unsuitable size, large or small, but neither would I make any attempt for a specimen of large-then-average stock, because, while there certainly are SOME benefits, I don't want to have to go to super-bottom anal stretching classes, or endure that kind of pain during sex


dick is a dick, and a cunt is a cunt, regardless of the proportions of their namesakes. So, I would say that BOTH parties involved in our tale of the hapless "friend" are out of line, and need to readjust their approaches...


For sure it was me who call hungs mules, horses,anacondas and etc and for sure I would stick with it as my erotic language. Regardeless with someone thinks its bias or not. I dont talk about studies but my personal experiences hands, eyes, pussy on it etc.

You for sure you dont have an ideia what it feel to have a pussy and receive a penis inside..what are you talking about a girth not be a perfect circle? Only in porn you can find picked up perfect looks penises species , in real life we meet all kinds in between. Foreskin is great to have inside and give extra stimulations in my experience, but other women may not feel the difference.

A fat penis inside, 6" girth is a good fit to me - and this I conclude after take penises 4.5" in between to 6" and even want more than that, yeh...my vagina is created to fuck fat ones because its get very very wet when aroused and I can acomodate nice fat ones..but is problematic with thinner girths because of exactly that too. A below average girth would feel lost in my wetness and we having not much fricctions going on..if I dont keep having to drying up. I have been there done that.


But what you dont seem to get it in your studies and because you are dealing with ass and male relations and not a pussy and penis. Is that a pussy at least mine produce natural lub in abundance to have a fat girth inside is my pleasure and I have a individual make up to receive it in me, no bleeding, no tearing, nah...it keeps producing lub as I have a penis inside me. Yes, I'm a girth woman as much I can take larger lenght- I prefer girth. I assume my biological "bias" as fitable to receive large girthy penises anytime.


People here can come up with whatever but a 6"x4.5" in no way shape or form is a hung penis, is an average with below average girth, even the girth to some is average..still all over average penis.
 

avg_joe

Sexy Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Posts
3,055
Media
0
Likes
94
Points
268
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Small------------------ 4.0" to 4.9"
Average--------------- 5.0" to 6.9"
Above Average--------- 7.0" to 7.9"
Large------------------ 8.0" to 8.9"
Extra Large------------ 9.0" to 9.9"
Double Long Daddy------ 10.0" and above
(Double Digits)
Erect girth should be 6.0" and above !!!
 
D

deleted13797

Guest
My favorite part of the story was when he brought a friend in for a threesome and didn't even know the size of his dick when the whole point was to show how big he is compared to other guys.
 

BiG Sixy!

Just Browsing
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Posts
17
Media
2
Likes
0
Points
146
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Well, I think it is HUNG because I am just under 6 inches but Im about 5 inches around and I think I am considered hung.
 

bonerdave

Just Browsing
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Posts
16
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
146
Gender
Male
i have 7.5+wide and the guys love it to suck on, but they then tell me its too small.
Most women cant take more than 6", and the ones that do have been fucking for a long time.
Most men that like men, love anything over 6".
I like a good sized one, I dont measure them when im down on them, but I know a big or hung cock by the way its feels in the throat.
bigdave
 

Hotrocker

Expert Member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Posts
836
Media
0
Likes
113
Points
238
Location
Anchorage (Alaska, United States)
Sexuality
No Response
:tongue: Yeh..here is a sensible guy..Snakebyte, thanks.

The guy actions and talking is full of nonsense because he plays roles, games etc in the end he wants sympaty and say he is 'confuse', sure he is... His side of his story do not fly in many ways to me.


He is an average lenght guy with a below average girth, he is not hung.

I would consider large a 7" in lenght with a 6" above girth.

Sure and 8" with 6" is large special even said to be "the perfect size" and call hung be the normal/correct use of the word hung...but in my mind eyes perceptions 'hung' to me is associate with horses, lol because when semi-hard or more sleepy, it hungs huuuuuuge between a man's legs and when a man's penis is that impressive not even full hard is the most erotic, hot exciting thing to me, for sure..ops sorry I was carried away :rolleyes: ...than 9" will fit in my mind horse hung anacondish...and anacondas above 9.5"...with extra fat girth as going 6.5", 7" etcs yeh is so impressive that most of us agree it is all of that.

Yep! It must struggle and be strangled than pop and keep going filling and filling our caves as a hung automatically will acomplishes the guerrilha invasion ..well kind of because some hungs extra "x" inches can't get through it and the balls will not get close as touch down/gooool...as pressing the entrance too...:eek: we the caves would be like in wonder..mix emotions and etc... :eek: :eek: :eek: ...yep!

:lmao:

And lets get real here..a cool hung guy is humble because he knows "it takes time" to take him or even he would be "scared" to be in a cave position as receiving himself situation..lol..well...he knows he carries a weapon let say...and if he is a good lover he uses with caution to give us a delicious experience. Thank you hungs!

For sure it was me who call hungs mules, horses,anacondas and etc and for sure I would stick with it as my erotic language. Regardeless with someone thinks its bias or not. I dont talk about studies but my personal experiences hands, eyes, pussy on it etc.

You for sure you dont have an ideia what it feel to have a pussy and receive a penis inside..what are you talking about a girth not be a perfect circle? Only in porn you can find picked up perfect looks penises species , in real life we meet all kinds in between. Foreskin is great to have inside and give extra stimulations in my experience, but other women may not feel the difference.

A fat penis inside, 6" girth is a good fit to me - and this I conclude after take penises 4.5" in between to 6" and even want more than that, yeh...my vagina is created to fuck fat ones because its get very very wet when aroused and I can acomodate nice fat ones..but is problematic with thinner girths because of exactly that too. A below average girth would feel lost in my wetness and we having not much fricctions going on..if I dont keep having to drying up. I have been there done that.


But what you dont seem to get it in your studies and because you are dealing with ass and male relations and not a pussy and penis. Is that a pussy at least mine produce natural lub in abundance to have a fat girth inside is my pleasure and I have a individual make up to receive it in me, no bleeding, no tearing, nah...it keeps producing lub as I have a penis inside me. Yes, I'm a girth woman as much I can take larger lenght- I prefer girth. I assume my biological "bias" as fitable to receive large girthy penises anytime.


People here can come up with whatever but a 6"x4.5" in no way shape or form is a hung penis, is an average with below average girth, even the girth to some is average..still all over average penis.

I thoroughly enjoy reading your posts. PLEASE keep them coming. :biggrin1:
 

schs1977

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Posts
177
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
53
If a dude is packing 8" inches, I would say he his hung. Some guys are an average of 6", but a 4" to 5" around. Is that considered hung? I'm nit dure, but he is well endowded. You cannot judge a dude by the bulge in his pants. Some guys are showers and some are growers. Also, some dudes a small or average cock but have big nuts
 

D_Delbert Dingleberry

Account Disabled
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Posts
89
Media
0
Likes
5
Points
43
Is he hung? My stupid opinion is that his cock is about the same size as most men's and that at that size he can and should be a very happy and blessed man. One who can satisfy a woman. One who should be working on other problems in life -- and I don't mean HIS own problems.

If anyone feels that he should be much larger than that, then they are the problem. Menace, is a better word.

If I had a cock that was big enough to hit a ground rule double in baseball, I still would not compare myself to any man, much less to feel that I am or claim that I am hung.

Hung?!

By providence and grace we are breathing air and walking this planet and so many people are sick, disabled and leading lives of physical misery -- and this guy or his friends are stressing that he is or is not handed down a bigger dick?! I have some suggestions.

Talk to a soldier who's had his cock blown off. Or a man with Stage 4 cancer. Or a really hung guy who's viral load is high this month.

If I had a 1 inch cock, I'd fuck the shit out of you. I'd fuck the shit out of you with NO cock.

I'd do that only if I had a healthy mind.

But with a fucked up head, even with Mandingo's cock I'd be searching for answers as to why I'm so inadequate.

Let me break it down -- all the way. If your friend was a woman with nice tits, in his current environment -- with the people he's surrounded himself with -- he'd be the guy who's be signing the consent forms to have DD cup implants installed.

Hung is one of those words to control people. Sounds like your friend could use a real friend.

Not a pump.
 

SR_dorkdick2000

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Posts
7
Media
0
Likes
5
Points
38
I doubt the OP will answer you. She began this thread in 2007 and has since been banned. And those involved have probably moved on by now.

What's we're basically looking at here is a fake story that was carefully written to create further insecurity in average sized men, because the size used in the story is the median average size mentioned in most scientific data. The guy would have to be living in a bubble if he thought he was hung at that size. Every man is aware of the statistics. And anyone who responded to it was not only stroking their large cock when they answered, but their ego as well ha ha.
 

D_Crystallized Ginger

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Posts
2,201
Media
0
Likes
42
Points
73
this story could sound strange..but a question arose from reading it... how do I rank in your opinion? I ve posted some post about it but this seems to be the rigth place to discuss it... I'm aware enough about my size and I think I am a bit above average with a length of 6.9 inches (17,5 cm) and a girth of 5.4 in (13,7 cm)..feedbacks from girls are good and I am quite satisfied but I'd like to try the thrill to be really hung sometimes... let's say 9 x 7 but 8x6 would be a nice size to have too... :D

How can I consider myself? small...? average? above average? please reply honestly ;-)

I like feedbacks from men and from girls please
 

davidjh7

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
2,607
Media
0
Likes
114
Points
283
Location
seattle
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
This issue has been, and likely will continue to be beat to death over and over. The definition of large, hung, massive, etc. all are pretty open adjectives to describe what is easily measureable according to established standard measurement practices. Your penis shouldn't define your entire self worth, but to many it does, for better or worse. Now, having said that, from all the talk, forums, discussions, postings, article ad nauseum I have read, it seems that for length, nobody argues that 8" and above is "hung". For thickness, nobody seems to dispute that 6" around and greater are "officially" thick, indicating hung status also. I believe this is why the 8"x6" "golden ratio" seems to have become so popular. Almost nobody argues that it isn't hung, either dimension, yet it is still practical to work with as a size for a majority of potential partners. Ok, I;ve said my piece.:biggrin1: