1
13788
Guest
Donk: Max, as always, you have a good point. I wholeheartedly agree that, before two people get married, unusually large penis size is one (of the many) things that they should know about each other in advance. Preferably, as you allude to, the woman should know such a thing before she has even made the commitment involved in even deciding to get married. And if the first sex does not occur until after marriage, the revelation must come in some other fashion.
I really respect you and your wife for waiting till marriage and, despite my own behavior to the contrary, I agree with those values. (What's the saying--the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak?)
Anyway, my comment was directed to feared's, which I clearly took to be in a context where premarital sex is presumed. In that context, I stand by my comment that "surprising" a woman with size is not necessarily any less courteous than announcing it beforehand and, in some ways, is more courteous. But I agree that pulling the same surprise on your wedding night is a different thing entirely.
I really respect you and your wife for waiting till marriage and, despite my own behavior to the contrary, I agree with those values. (What's the saying--the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak?)
Anyway, my comment was directed to feared's, which I clearly took to be in a context where premarital sex is presumed. In that context, I stand by my comment that "surprising" a woman with size is not necessarily any less courteous than announcing it beforehand and, in some ways, is more courteous. But I agree that pulling the same surprise on your wedding night is a different thing entirely.