Photo Huge natural tits on a thin body

overloaded

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Posts
728
Media
0
Likes
1,043
Points
138
Anna Song

1 pic and links

Anna-Song-09.jpg


pics
Porn pics of ANOTHER ALLTIME FAVE.ANNA SONG, FLAWLESS,TIMELESS RUSSIAN BEAUTY (Page 1)
Porn pics of Anna Song (Page 1)
Porn pics of Anna Song (Page 1)
Porn pics of Anna Song 04 (Page 1)

vids
Busty Anna Strong stripping - XVIDEOS.COM
2 busty woman suck eachothers boobs - XVIDEOS.COM
Anna Song plays with herself in the car - XVIDEOS.COM
 

AlexGein

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Posts
40
Media
0
Likes
25
Points
53
Location
Berlin
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
*sigh* I hate to say this, but I'm out.

This thread is getting killed by what's basically spam. There are far too many women with D Cups in the world for people to just start trying to post every single one of them in here. I can't even scroll down properly anymore, it feels like dial-up trying to load all this stuff.

I think this could be fixed by having specified height and width attributes in the img tags that are in the html of each page. At the moment, the browser doesnt know the picture sizes till they're downloaded causing that extremely annoying effect where the page seems to keep growing and scrolling up.

I vote to keep the pics as they are, if we can get rid of that effect. Its nice to scroll down a sea of boobs :)
 

TexanStar

Worshipped Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Posts
10,496
Media
0
Likes
14,979
Points
183
Location
Fort Worth (Texas, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
It's not the embedded pictures that's the issue for me. It's the volume of them. Even if it was links it'd be the same problem as now.

Used to be you'd have posters finding women with really unique physiques and posting them here. Posts with just 1 or 2 pictures in them depending how lucky they were in their searching.

Now it's like people are just doing a google image search on "busty" and posting every single picture that comes up into their reply. I'm not going to scroll through 200 pics on the off-chance that one of them actually lives up to the spirit of the thread. I know how to use google myself and if this thread is just going to try and mimic a search engine result there's no point to visit it. I know how to use Google already.
 

MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2003
Posts
41,382
Media
0
Likes
42,275
Points
718
Location
New Jersey, USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
It's not the embedded pictures that's the issue for me. It's the volume of them. Even if it was links it'd be the same problem as now.

Used to be you'd have posters finding women with really unique physiques and posting them here. Posts with just 1 or 2 pictures in them depending how lucky they were in their searching.

Now it's like people are just doing a google image search on "busty" and posting every single picture that comes up into their reply. I'm not going to scroll through 200 pics on the off-chance that one of them actually lives up to the spirit of the thread. I know how to use google myself and if this thread is just going to try and mimic a search engine result there's no point to visit it. I know how to use Google already.
I'm not into putting a lot of pics on here, myself, to much competition. I like researching places like YOUJIZZ OR XHAMSTER for natural tits videos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lapdog2001

conntom

Cherished Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Posts
2,170
Media
1
Likes
254
Points
208
Location
Boston (Massachusetts, United States)
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
It's not the embedded pictures that's the issue for me. It's the volume of them. Even if it was links it'd be the same problem as now.

Used to be you'd have posters finding women with really unique physiques and posting them here. Posts with just 1 or 2 pictures in them depending how lucky they were in their searching.

Now it's like people are just doing a google image search on "busty" and posting every single picture that comes up into their reply. I'm not going to scroll through 200 pics on the off-chance that one of them actually lives up to the spirit of the thread. I know how to use google myself and if this thread is just going to try and mimic a search engine result there's no point to visit it. I know how to use Google already.


THIS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: _antialias_

AlexGein

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Posts
40
Media
0
Likes
25
Points
53
Location
Berlin
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
It's not the embedded pictures that's the issue for me. It's the volume of them. Even if it was links it'd be the same problem as now.

Used to be you'd have posters finding women with really unique physiques and posting them here. Posts with just 1 or 2 pictures in them depending how lucky they were in their searching.

Now it's like people are just doing a google image search on "busty" and posting every single picture that comes up into their reply. I'm not going to scroll through 200 pics on the off-chance that one of them actually lives up to the spirit of the thread. I know how to use google myself and if this thread is just going to try and mimic a search engine result there's no point to visit it. I know how to use Google already.

Ok yeah I see your point. There does need to be stronger quality control, but then I guess thats down to individual taste (assuming its within the criteria of the thread).


I'm still annoyed about the page growing thing though :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: lapdog2001

individual2020

Experimental Member
Joined
May 3, 2008
Posts
4
Media
0
Likes
5
Points
223
It's not the embedded pictures that's the issue for me. It's the volume of them. Even if it was links it'd be the same problem as now.

Used to be you'd have posters finding women with really unique physiques and posting them here. Posts with just 1 or 2 pictures in them depending how lucky they were in their searching.

Now it's like people are just doing a google image search on "busty" and posting every single picture that comes up into their reply. I'm not going to scroll through 200 pics on the off-chance that one of them actually lives up to the spirit of the thread. I know how to use google myself and if this thread is just going to try and mimic a search engine result there's no point to visit it. I know how to use Google already.
I agree. This has been brought up multiple times before and a bunch of idiots always chime in saying "who cares, I like looking at pics of girls with big tits!" Well, the whole point of a message board like this is that you can have lots of different threads on lots of different topics. The site becomes useless if all the pics/vids are the same. I ignore the other generic "big tits" threads because they don't do much for me. I used to appreciate this thread because my particular favorite body type on a woman is that "two cantaloupes hanging off what is otherwise the body of a 12-year-old gymnast" type, which is very rare. This thread was one of the few places to find them.

There are 3 adjectives in the thread title: "huge," "natural," and "thin." At least one, if not all three, of these are routinely violated in almost every post. Girls with larger-than-average (but not huge) breasts, fake breasts, and/or ful-figured (or even plump) bodies have completely drowned out the actual thread topic. Pathetic.
 

TexanStar

Worshipped Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Posts
10,496
Media
0
Likes
14,979
Points
183
Location
Fort Worth (Texas, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I went ahead and started a discussion group: Huge Natural Breasts on a Thin Body | LPSG

Anyone who wants to join can shoot me an invite request. Non-members will be able to view all the posts, but I think only members should be able to post there (and I should be able to remove anyone who makes a habit of posting content that fails to live up to the spirit of the topic).
 
  • Like
Reactions: lapdog2001

tgirlsrgreat

LPSG Legend
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Posts
78,440
Media
1,633
Likes
113,821
Points
393
Location
Austin, Texas, US
Verification
View
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
I agree. This has been brought up multiple times before and a bunch of idiots always chime in saying "who cares, I like looking at pics of girls with big tits!" Well, the whole point of a message board like this is that you can have lots of different threads on lots of different topics. The site becomes useless if all the pics/vids are the same. I ignore the other generic "big tits" threads because they don't do much for me. I used to appreciate this thread because my particular favorite body type on a woman is that "two cantaloupes hanging off what is otherwise the body of a 12-year-old gymnast" type, which is very rare. This thread was one of the few places to find them.

There are 3 adjectives in the thread title: "huge," "natural," and "thin." At least one, if not all three, of these are routinely violated in almost every post. Girls with larger-than-average (but not huge) breasts, fake breasts, and/or ful-figured (or even plump) bodies have completely drowned out the actual thread topic. Pathetic.

7 years, one message, thanks for your contribution!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 015Dutch and Sotos

MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2003
Posts
41,382
Media
0
Likes
42,275
Points
718
Location
New Jersey, USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I agree. This has been brought up multiple times before and a bunch of idiots always chime in saying "who cares, I like looking at pics of girls with big tits!" Well, the whole point of a message board like this is that you can have lots of different threads on lots of different topics. The site becomes useless if all the pics/vids are the same. I ignore the other generic "big tits" threads because they don't do much for me. I used to appreciate this thread because my particular favorite body type on a woman is that "two cantaloupes hanging off what is otherwise the body of a 12-year-old gymnast" type, which is very rare. This thread was one of the few places to find them.

There are 3 adjectives in the thread title: "huge," "natural," and "thin." At least one, if not all three, of these are routinely violated in almost every post. Girls with larger-than-average (but not huge) breasts, fake breasts, and/or ful-figured (or even plump) bodies have completely drowned out the actual thread topic. Pathetic.
Your whole post speaks volumes of truth there, individual; This thread used to be great thread for huge natural tits, but it seems that a lot of people are too apathetic about whether or not the contributions are real or not nowadays, and it seems like talking to a brick wall additionally.
 

theluke

Cherished Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Posts
221
Media
0
Likes
388
Points
158
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
RachelA1.jpg


Ever seen Ghostbusters? Venkman says he's fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. Well, I'm fuzzy on the whole thin/skinny/not fat thing.

There is a difference between having a nice figure (with big boobs), and being fat. And there was rarely a fat girl posted on here.

This is one of the threads I visit daily. No need to change it. I don't want to click on links. I just want to see dem booooobies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: etowah