Hunks with small cocks

[john457]

 

[john457]

 

[James_Sayz]

Everyone is hitting it out of the park with these recent posts. Great Job.

 

[Jjdov27_2]

View attachment 61665411

Right before you realize your mother-in-law stayed in the guest room the night before.

 

[dtarlock]

Right before you realize your mother-in-law stayed in the guest room the night before.

And feels bad for her daughter

 

[aonee]

More photos from this shoot.

 

[john457]

And feels bad for her daughter

I really like the contrast between the masculine looking beard and the shockingly small dick.

I think I have some more pics of him

 

[deleted1276183]

u/Mrbuttcheeks2

 

[reece86]

 

[flavianbellamy]

Peter Johnson

 

[john457]

 

[Jjdov27_2]

Peter Johnson

View attachment 61723741View attachment 61723811View attachment 61723821View attachment 61723831View attachment 61723881

So, why do you think this man was chosen as the nude model? Obviously he has a great look—strong, masculine, virile. But he is also obviously smaller endowed. And the photographer seems to make no allowance to frame that endowment in a way that compensated for that fact. Rather the opposite, it seems.

so was the fact that the model was smaller endowed part of the photographer’s vision and intent? Did he go with the model because of his overall look and stuck with it dispute the endowment?

it seems to me that the endowment must have been part of the intent. What do you guys think?

 

[davepadillas]

So, why do you think this man was chosen as the nude model? Obviously he has a great look—strong, masculine, virile. But he is also obviously smaller endowed. And the photographer seems to make no allowance to frame that endowment in a way that compensated for that fact. Rather the opposite, it seems.

so was the fact that the model was smaller endowed part of the photographer’s vision and intent? Did he go with the model because of his overall look and stuck with it dispute the endowment?

it seems to me that the endowment must have been part of the intent. What do you guys think?

He's gorgeous and I just couldn't care less if he has a small dick

 

[lttle1]

 

[fckabull]

https://twitter.com/bigajxxx?s=21

 

[davepadillas]

https://twitter.com/bigajxxx?s=21
View attachment 61789851View attachment 61789861View attachment 61789871View attachment 61789881View attachment 61789891View attachment 61789901

Husband material who cares about the tiny dick when he’s so good looking?

 

[john457]

 

[James_Sayz]

So, why do you think this man was chosen as the nude model? Obviously he has a great look—strong, masculine, virile. But he is also obviously smaller endowed. And the photographer seems to make no allowance to frame that endowment in a way that compensated for that fact. Rather the opposite, it seems.

so was the fact that the model was smaller endowed part of the photographer’s vision and intent? Did he go with the model because of his overall look and stuck with it dispute the endowment?

it seems to me that the endowment must have been part of the intent. What do you guys think?

He was probably chosen for his handsome face & physique. He's NOT modeling for a dick campaign. Once again, NONE of us get to choose our endowment. Penis size is just as random as eye color. SIGH....

 

[john457]

Bart van Bezouw

 

[john457]