Hunks with small cocks
- Thread starter lex22
- Start date
-
- Tags
- hunks small cock unhung
BBBDude29
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2020
- Posts
- 2,521
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 44,262
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
BBBDude29
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2020
- Posts
- 2,521
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 44,262
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I've had an epiphany! I've felt for a long time that many of the men in "Hunks with Small Cocks" aren't really that small; they're what you see every day at the gym. Not big; average.
Today I realized that it's just a matter of perception. Although the average penis is somewhere around 5.1" erect and 3.6" flaccid, porno and modern media depictions have shifted our perception of that upwards. In other words, we now class most cocks which aren't large as small; that is, average is the new small.
We wonder why so many guys today shower in their underwear. In my father's and grandfather's generation, they just looked around the showers, saw how they fit in, no big deal. Now young guys check things out on the internet, feel the pressure, and do the towel dance. Not only guys, but girls. I read the other day that girls check men out on the internet; lots of searches of gay sites (for the male pics) and, interestingly, black sites (checking out the BBC rumors, perhaps). This obviously places more pressure on young men to measure up.
So, yep, I guess most guys post average-sized cocks here because, well, they're not big, which makes them, in their eyes, well, small.
Today I realized that it's just a matter of perception. Although the average penis is somewhere around 5.1" erect and 3.6" flaccid, porno and modern media depictions have shifted our perception of that upwards. In other words, we now class most cocks which aren't large as small; that is, average is the new small.
We wonder why so many guys today shower in their underwear. In my father's and grandfather's generation, they just looked around the showers, saw how they fit in, no big deal. Now young guys check things out on the internet, feel the pressure, and do the towel dance. Not only guys, but girls. I read the other day that girls check men out on the internet; lots of searches of gay sites (for the male pics) and, interestingly, black sites (checking out the BBC rumors, perhaps). This obviously places more pressure on young men to measure up.
So, yep, I guess most guys post average-sized cocks here because, well, they're not big, which makes them, in their eyes, well, small.
BBBDude29
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2020
- Posts
- 2,521
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 44,262
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I agree with some of what you say Jock… but I’d disagree about the reason communal nudity declined.
In my generation, young men did not casually get naked. There were no after PE showers or anything like that. The only time there was communal nudity was when it was unavoidable… and then it was still often avoided.
So the change happened a lot earlier than the internet. Perhaps you could make the argument that the onset of porn available in the home on TV and video…. But personally I think the shift happened as culture became
More overtly sexualized.
Men, in general, do not like themselves to be viewed as “sex objects” except on their own terms. (And, in terms of the traditional ear I grew up in, by women.) and single sex spaces (such as swimming) disappeared and popular culture became more specialized, nudity—even if it was a single sex space—became more sexualized.
The older generation that didn’t have a specialized view of nudity were thought of as my generation as somewhat creepy. WHY are they insistent of standing nude in the locker room and shaving when they could just get dressed? Must be because nudity WAS the point…. Ned therefore creepy.
This went somewhat hand in hand with a “no homo” thinking. Since nudity was by nature sexual, then the only reason anyone would care if there WASNT nudity must was that as a sexual object. So no one had any social incentive to challenge it.
Perhaps a byproduct of this was that men’s self impression got skewed. Certainly men don’t want to seem weaker or different in that context. (Again, I’m generalizing here about male perspectives.) and the further their self appraisal got form their impression of “normal”, the more incentive for modesty.
As someone who finds the psychology of size in men interesting, it’s why the “college wrestlers in singlets” thread is interesting. Because there are the macho athletes who, even though modestly is fully entrenched, still get photographed with their VPL on full display. And many of them seem very small relative to the social norm. So it’s a complete 180 from how most men behave these days.
In my generation, young men did not casually get naked. There were no after PE showers or anything like that. The only time there was communal nudity was when it was unavoidable… and then it was still often avoided.
So the change happened a lot earlier than the internet. Perhaps you could make the argument that the onset of porn available in the home on TV and video…. But personally I think the shift happened as culture became
More overtly sexualized.
Men, in general, do not like themselves to be viewed as “sex objects” except on their own terms. (And, in terms of the traditional ear I grew up in, by women.) and single sex spaces (such as swimming) disappeared and popular culture became more specialized, nudity—even if it was a single sex space—became more sexualized.
The older generation that didn’t have a specialized view of nudity were thought of as my generation as somewhat creepy. WHY are they insistent of standing nude in the locker room and shaving when they could just get dressed? Must be because nudity WAS the point…. Ned therefore creepy.
This went somewhat hand in hand with a “no homo” thinking. Since nudity was by nature sexual, then the only reason anyone would care if there WASNT nudity must was that as a sexual object. So no one had any social incentive to challenge it.
Perhaps a byproduct of this was that men’s self impression got skewed. Certainly men don’t want to seem weaker or different in that context. (Again, I’m generalizing here about male perspectives.) and the further their self appraisal got form their impression of “normal”, the more incentive for modesty.
As someone who finds the psychology of size in men interesting, it’s why the “college wrestlers in singlets” thread is interesting. Because there are the macho athletes who, even though modestly is fully entrenched, still get photographed with their VPL on full display. And many of them seem very small relative to the social norm. So it’s a complete 180 from how most men behave these days.
