Hunks with small cocks

Find the penis of the stud
1721597757720.png


I can't find the penis OR the stud. Looks a toss up to me.

Ha ha ha :emoji_laughing:
He meant this lil' dicked stud
1721597947459.png


Wow! Who'da thunk? Is that really him? Still hard to find the penis, but ditching the old lady, oversized sunglasses, the blue clutch and all that paint makes a big difference. . . okay, maybe not a big difference, but this guy is a stud. . . at least from the waist up!
 
Ha ha ha :emoji_laughing:
He meant this lil' dicked stud
View attachment 138373251
CORRECTION

No, he didn't! unless he's been circ-ed or un-circ-ed somewhere along the way. In @MAXXXX!00's original "Find the penis of the stud" post, he's circumcised. In your response, he's not. Magic!

Fooled me once. . . LOL
 
Last edited:
What a muscled Stud, now calling him out for maybe some photoshop magic to be able to make the grade to get into this forum

Yes we all know this is the forum all studs want to get posted on and will cheat to do so :)
 
CORRECTION

No, he didn't! unless he's been circ-ed or un-circ-ed somewhere along the way. In @MAXXXX!00's original "Find the penis of the stud" post, he's circumcised. In your response, he's not. Magic!

Fooled me once. . . LOL

The foreskin grew back between the
photo-sessions = dicklet hunk-magic :laughing: :emoji_wink:
giphy.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: LilJock
  • Love
Reactions: 7.25x6
I used to love this thread, but lately it seems that nobody can agree on what should be posted. Some don't know what a hunk is and post hideously unattractive guys with small dicks. Others post obviously photoshopped images, which I personally hate, but others may like. Some (like myself) post hunks with average dicks or soft dicks, which causes complaints also.
Agreed!
The obviously altered penises is a turn-off.
 
But, Maxx, what about point number one?
Mr Heftner

4 cents with considering you asked ;)

I hear your points and massively agree with you on photoshopped images

On the other points I think their is a little interpretation from everyone what is considered a Hunk sometimes a hunk to one is not to another but I think mostly on this forum. However I think its rather on track most of the time.

Then to the question of what is a small cock to people. I normally aim for anything that is like a button or just does not hang or under an inch and a half or 3-4" hard by judging the photo. However I know their would be a big range of views on this.

I think this forum is 95% on topic and it can be great to disagree at times and have a debate on particular men posted

now lets celebrate the men the little tools
 
I used to love this thread, but lately it seems that nobody can agree on what should be posted. Some don't know what a hunk is and post hideously unattractive guys with small dicks. Others post obviously photoshopped images, which I personally hate, but others may like. Some (like myself) post hunks with average dicks or soft dicks, which causes complaints also.
I am with you when it comes to the postings of non-hunks and beer bellied ugly entities. It is in the forum's/thread's name "Hunks with small cocks". The forum-name is not "Men with small cocks" or "Average and overweight men with small cocks".
It is not that hard to google the words "Hunk pic" and see what a hunk is.