those biceps are disappointing stud . Tiny cock or just a cold day?
![GTBJo5hXcAANiE1.jpeg]( "GTBJo5hXcAANiE1.jpeg")
Hunks with small cocks
- Thread starter lex22
- Start date
-
- Tags
- hunks small cock unhung
CORRECTION
No, he didn't! unless he's been circ-ed or un-circ-ed somewhere along the way. In @MAXXXX!00's original "Find the penis of the stud" post, he's circumcised. In your response, he's not. Magic!
Fooled me once. . . LOL
Last edited:
What a muscled Stud, now calling him out for maybe some photoshop magic to be able to make the grade to get into this forum
Yes we all know this is the forum all studs want to get posted on and will cheat to do so
Just found out the video, just wanted to share it in here, in case anyone is interested in seeing it.
Tomas & Hugo RAW - CHERRY BUSTING
okiidan
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2020
- Posts
- 5,116
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 55,668
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Chicago (Illinois, United States)
- Gender
- Male
okiidan
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2020
- Posts
- 5,116
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 55,668
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Chicago (Illinois, United States)
- Gender
- Male
Agreed!
The obviously altered penises is a turn-off.
I agree on that point too
Mr Heftner
4 cents with considering you asked
I hear your points and massively agree with you on photoshopped images
On the other points I think their is a little interpretation from everyone what is considered a Hunk sometimes a hunk to one is not to another but I think mostly on this forum. However I think its rather on track most of the time.
Then to the question of what is a small cock to people. I normally aim for anything that is like a button or just does not hang or under an inch and a half or 3-4" hard by judging the photo. However I know their would be a big range of views on this.
I think this forum is 95% on topic and it can be great to disagree at times and have a debate on particular men posted
now lets celebrate the men the little tools
Spot the Hung with the tiny cock
![GTA-Mf5WoAAmQ3j.jpeg]( "GTA-Mf5WoAAmQ3j.jpeg")
And that Should be Hunk not Hung? well maybe for one of the Hunks
I am with you when it comes to the postings of non-hunks and beer bellied ugly entities. It is in the forum's/thread's name "Hunks with small cocks". The forum-name is not "Men with small cocks" or "Average and overweight men with small cocks".
It is not that hard to google the words "Hunk pic" and see what a hunk is.
3.9 inches short (long) when erected.
The user who started this forum, posted severaly photoshopped pics during the past years, but he never posted non-hunks or overweight men. So that seems to be the lowest lowest limit. If he didn't want photoshopped pics in his forum, he would have written that in his 1st. post or in the forum-name or he would not post altered pics himself.
