Kasso, you posted like an ignorant twat, that's why I insulted you. Here it is again, in case you forgot what you really said:
Right away, you are telling people we are not worth the time to edit for. Great. I don't care about you either then.
I couldnt care less if you care. This is not about caring.
Absolute falsehood. NOTHING of the sort has been "proven". I took offense at your unsubstantiated claim. Who made this "proof"? Where's your documentation?
And please, show me your proof and documentation. That link in your previous post proved nothing, please put a quote of an exact paragraph stating what you think is proof.
I agree that there are different types of intelligence, but very little has been "proven" to any degree as the study of the mind is still in its infancy stages.
And this adds nothing to either side because years into the future either side could be proven wrong, so should we postpone this untill we know more about the human brain?
This is called arguing for points, and I find it revolting. It is YOU who are lacking substance when you write poorly to leave yourself an out when you get called out on your points.
im not getting called out on my points..., thats the point, the fact that they can no longer call me out on my points, and use spelling correction as a retort. lol.
That's exactly what I said earlier on, and I stand behind that statement. You are free to disagree, naturally.
Conversations are not about "winning", even the desire for that is just unseemly. Conversations are about learning.
Oh yes indeed, they are about learning, but im trying to learn about a specific subject. Lets say we are arguing over the existance of god. I learn your side, you learn my side, and with all the information we have a better view, and can settle what we think about the subject. But if i make some good points that you cant say anything to, i dont want to learn what words i spelled wrong, im trying to learn your side of the argument.
People call you out on your spelling and grammar because it's distracting and insulting. They will feel free to insult you back- deal with it.
So my perfectly valid point in a debate is negated because i misspelled a word. Ok, you make sense ahaha. Hilarious. If a homeless bum who never learned to read or write tried to debate with you, would you simply shrug him off because he is illiterate? Would his whole argument mean nothing because he cant spell "astronomical" or somthing.
Also if im debating sombody im not the one insulting. In this case you were the one to throw down the gauntlets of verbal abuse.
If you are debating sombody, and you cant stay on topic, you cant retort, what does that mean? Certainly not "correct his spelling errors! thats a good retort yea!" No.
Sure, set the bar low so you can just spring your brilliance upon them at unawares! I'm just soooooo impressed! *swoons* You really sound like a moron saying things like that, I hope you at least realise it.
Exactly! Its like basketball, i pretend to suck at handling the ball, then i bust out a sick move and break your ankles.
But in this case, i make a couple spelling errors, you cant retort to whatever statement i made, so you correct my spelling and forfiet! If you think im an idiot i dont care.
But you don't have valid debate points, you just present your own opinion as fact. Not very impressive. You don't make a good case for yourself, and I don't feel a bit bad about insulting you. You have to spell right to be understood, and if you don't care if the reader has a difficult time making sense of your gibberish, why would you even expect them to care about deciphering your brilliant "points"? They're too busy trying to figure out what the fuck you just said.