You know, most of what you like in someone can not be tied directly to race. Even by you own admission, skin tone varies among race so what is it exactly about non-whites that you find so appalling that you wont give them a chance? Why are you more attracted to people of the "white race"? If I recall correctly, you have argued in favor of the point about it being ok to have a dating racial preference. Why is it ok if race does not help exclude ppl that you are not attracted to and does not define a clear boundary that categorizes those you are attracted to? Do you now understand my whole point?
Interracial Relationships
- Thread starter Apolo1998
- Start date
You know, most of what you like in someone can not be tied directly to race. Even by you own admission, skin tone varies among race so what is it exactly about non-whites that you find so appalling that you wont give them a chance? Why are you more attracted to people of the "white race"? If I recall correctly, you have argued in favor of the point about it being ok to have a dating racial preference. Why is it ok if race does not help exclude ppl that you are not attracted to and does not define a clear boundary that categorizes those you are attracted to? Do you now understand my whole point?
Nope. You didn't. I said that more than half of Africa area was above the equator, and you said that was belowe, except for a small part of North Africa.Reread my post. Simp, that’s what I described.
Stupid and also a liar.
Right. There's nothing as white race. Intra group differences are more than inter group differences.
I guess that the only cut off could be the actual skin tone. But in those case would be just like hair colour.
yeah I did. It’s not surprising that you’re lacking reading comprehension skills. You didn’t understand anything else so why would you understand what I said now. SMH embarrassing.
No, you didn't, and you're Just trying to make a mess and hide your mistakes.
Yeah I did. Just take the L. You don’t know what racism is. You don’t understand the concept of race. You don’t understand geography. Your reading comprehension skills are lacking. You don’t know what you’re talking about. It’s okay. Just take the L.This is getting downright embarrassing now.
"Take the L" , he said.
PFFF
A small part of North Africa...
Since you studied geography at the Trump School of the Street, I'll give you a link of the Britannica (yes, the Encyclopedia).
And since I doubt you can read the whole link Africa | History, People, Countries, Map, & Facts , I am going to give you and extract:
"Because of the bulge formed by western Africa, the greater part of Africa’s territory lies north of the Equator."
The L, he said.
But why I am surprised? I literally posted the map with a huge red line that you could check by yourself. If you can't understand a pic, I doubt you'll understand a text.
You want to keep going. Okay, actually if you want to get extremely technical. It’s really sits on the equator. But I know you don’t understand that at all. My comment still stands. So not sure what you believe your arguing. That link isn’t helping bro lol.
True, hardly anything can be tied directly to race. But consider this: you can usually tell what race someone is just by looking at them. You don’t need to know them, don’t need to know their culture, don’t need to know where they came from, and don’t even need to talk to them.
Attraction is mostly a visual process, at least at first. (it can also be supplemented by non-visual processes, once you get to know the person as well ). Surely you know it’s possible To look at someone for the first time and immediately have sexual thoughts. If that happens, you are attracted. If that does not happen, you are not attracted. And that’s OK.
since it’s generally very easy to tell a persons race just by looking at them, and since attraction is so strongly correlated with the visual processing, it’s only natural that humans keep The two related to each other. That doesn’t mean there can’t be exceptions to the rule, of course.
your question is very clumsily worded. You are working under the assumption that I find non-whites “appalling.” I do not.
and why are you working under the assumption that I will not give non-whites a chance? I have both dated, and had sex with non-whites before.
This question is kind of just a cycling totalogy. White people generally meet the criteria for what I find attractive more often than other races. This obviously doesn’t mean that I find all white people attractive. It also doesn’t mean that I find all non-white people unattractive.
do not allow yourself to make the error of working in absolutes like this. Nothing is absolute when it comes to attraction.
The freedom to choose who you wish to be intimate with is one of the most personal freedoms we have in this world. I dare say, it’s also one of the most important... just below freedom of thought (not freedom of speech... notice I said thought). Attraction is also a thought related process.
if I say I’m not going to have sex with you, I am not denying you any basic freedom that you have. If you choose to shame someone for who they are attracted to (I.e call them a bigot , racist, etc) you are basically persecuting them for that freedom. I dare say, you are almost persecuting them for a thought crime.
I believe people should do things that make them happy, so long as what they do does not infringe upon the rights of others to be happy. If it makes you happy to date a Black person, I say get out there, and find yourself a black person to spend your life with, and both of you, be happy.
If I choose not to have sex with you, it will not infringe upon your right to live a happy life.
Extremely technical? I studied that at elementary school, WTF.
Your comment stand just like the words I quoted.
False, very imprecise at best and self contradoctory.
Contradictory my ass. It’s not my problem you have a reading comprehension issue. How have you studied that in elementary school. When you’ve continued to get so much wrong. Hell I even doubt you’ve attended a University at this point.You’ve still yet to explain how this helps your argument that there are dark skinned white people.
“Dark skinned” is a subjective term. What I consider dark skin might not be considered dark skin by your standards. There’s no need to discuss such a moot point.
Basic geography of the world is studied at elementary school.
Probably you skipped that. That whole Africa stuff was embarassing. Even more because you negated and negated until I quoted your words in bold.
Then biology at middle and high school. Enough to know that some mediterranean people are caucasian (white) but their skin is basically brown or light brown due to sun exposure.
Not different from north Africa population.
Skin colour is just a single phenotype trait, that can change a lot in every human type.
The classification from just skin colour is nonsense, of course, or albinos would be all white.
It's not mandatory to know those things, (except Africa geography, that is mandatory, son)but at least don't act like you are educated, and don't be arrogant.
You looked like a big fool.
I already busted you, just quoting your words and showing how you were lying, and contradicting yourself.
I am not going to waste time on you again. Just go to Wikipedia and fill the holes in your educativo, I am out of this nonsense.
Africa is exactly what I said it was. I mentioned the technicality after you kept trying to act like it was over the equator. Being on the equator was actually in my initial description as well. I said below which it is, but my initial statement described what the map shows. I don’t expect you to understand that because your reading comprehension isn’t up to par. That’s what’s really embarrassing here and the fact that you keep trying to argue. I didn’t contradict myself at all. You’re reading comprehension is just really bad. Like I mentioned before, that can be because English isn’t your first language. That would certainly explain why you don’t understand basic English.
Here’s a skin tone chart. Mediterranean people are not darker than golden tan on this chart.even with the sun exposure they receive. That skin tone isn’t brown or dark. I know that may be confusing for some, but I didn’t think that would be such a hard concept to understand from someone pretending to be so well versed in world knowledge. People in North Africa are from the warm tan on down. Not similar at all actually.
You’ve made yourself look foolish through all of this. Spouting off several unintelligible things that would only come from a simple minded person. Like stating you have definitive proof that race isn’t a thing. You don’t have proof and would never be able to prove that. The social constructs of race is based off more than just skin tone. It’s combination of phenotype, region and culture of that region. So you would never be able to prove something like that. You’d know that if you were actually educated on the subject in which your trying to argue. Oh and by the way. Try not quoting sources like Wikipedia if you expect to be taken seriously. Something an educated individual would know as well lol. Stop embarrassing yourself and don’t interject yourself without the proper knowledge.
It can be subjective to a degree, but I believe it’s best to choose your descriptive words carefully in instances like this. It can be misleading.
dark skinned means dark skinned. There everyone here seems to understand what I’m saying except for you. There’s nothing misleading about the word.
Dark skin does mean dark skin, but what you’re referring to isn’t dark skin. That’s why I said what I said initially.
Racists are always such fucking morons.
