1
13788
Guest
chetthomas05: What Id like to discuss is not limited to the world of men that are well endowed, but I certainly think your perspectives and ideas on this topic will differ from the average man. Also, the women who are fans of larger men will possibly have different ideas regarding this topic than other women.
Lately, the idea of MFM threesomes has captivated my attention. While searching around the Internet to find more information about experiences, advice, and other relevant information, I discovered that the majority of material directed towards threesomes caters to MFF or FMF threesomes.
My experiences as a young male have led me to understand that in the personal world, strait guys generally tended to desire threesomes where the other two partners are of the opposite sex. In the impersonal world of the Internet I have found this to be true, too. I am not surprised by this because if you are a guy who places your self-satisfaction at the top of your priority list, then I suppose you would desire two women catering to your desires. I believe this is the general mindset of men when thinking about threesomes.
I also believe that the reason why a number of men reject the idea of a MFM threesome is because of insecurity issues regarding their penis size. Being in front of another man, with a women present, means much more to a mans ego than showing in a locker room. Since this site is specifically for men that should not suffer from insecurity issues because of their size, I would think that the strait men here would be more welcoming of MFM threesomes than average size strait men.
My limited experience with women has made me aware of the fact that some girls do entertain the thought of various threesomes (MFM, FMF, MFF). I do not feel that I can make any general statements from my personal experiences with women because the information I have obtained has been only from a few. My search for information about MFM threesomes on the Internet has led me to the conclusion that the expression of desire for MFM threesomes among women is, in comparison to men and FMF threesomes, significantly lower.
On average, I do not believe women have a lesser sex drive or sexual imagination than men. From this belief, I am left pondering why, on the impersonal message boards across the Internet, more women are not expressing their desires and fantasies about MFM threesomes. I wonder why women do not express such inclinations because, from my rational, women are better suited to partake in MFM threesomes than other threesome arrangements.
In comparing the two directly opposite threesome arrangements, MFM & FMF, it is without a doubt (in my mind) that a MFM threesome is a more conducive arrangement for providing satisfaction to all three partners than a FMF threesome. A woman can much more easily satisfy two men than a man can satisfy two women. While a man might be able to satisfy two women, the number of ways in which he can accomplish such a feat is less than the number of ways a women can satisfy two men. This is because a womens body has a greater number of features that have the potential of providing a man pleasure. Conversely, those features that provide a man with pleasure, whether orifices or not, have the potential to provide the women with pleasure.
A mans body, not only has less distinct areas to engage, but his body is not as receptive as a womans to various forms of attention. For example, the physical attention paid to a mans chest by a women, generally, will not have the same impact as the physical attention a man gives to a womans chest.
It is because of the advantages MFM threesomes offer to women (center of attention ect) that I cannot quite understand why there is not a greater amount of discussion amongst women about MFM threesomes. Also, it is because of the advantages MFM threesomes offer to both male and female participants that I do not understand why the subject is not discussed more in comparison to other forms of threesomes.
Any ideas and input into this topic would be greatly appreciated.
Lately, the idea of MFM threesomes has captivated my attention. While searching around the Internet to find more information about experiences, advice, and other relevant information, I discovered that the majority of material directed towards threesomes caters to MFF or FMF threesomes.
My experiences as a young male have led me to understand that in the personal world, strait guys generally tended to desire threesomes where the other two partners are of the opposite sex. In the impersonal world of the Internet I have found this to be true, too. I am not surprised by this because if you are a guy who places your self-satisfaction at the top of your priority list, then I suppose you would desire two women catering to your desires. I believe this is the general mindset of men when thinking about threesomes.
I also believe that the reason why a number of men reject the idea of a MFM threesome is because of insecurity issues regarding their penis size. Being in front of another man, with a women present, means much more to a mans ego than showing in a locker room. Since this site is specifically for men that should not suffer from insecurity issues because of their size, I would think that the strait men here would be more welcoming of MFM threesomes than average size strait men.
My limited experience with women has made me aware of the fact that some girls do entertain the thought of various threesomes (MFM, FMF, MFF). I do not feel that I can make any general statements from my personal experiences with women because the information I have obtained has been only from a few. My search for information about MFM threesomes on the Internet has led me to the conclusion that the expression of desire for MFM threesomes among women is, in comparison to men and FMF threesomes, significantly lower.
On average, I do not believe women have a lesser sex drive or sexual imagination than men. From this belief, I am left pondering why, on the impersonal message boards across the Internet, more women are not expressing their desires and fantasies about MFM threesomes. I wonder why women do not express such inclinations because, from my rational, women are better suited to partake in MFM threesomes than other threesome arrangements.
In comparing the two directly opposite threesome arrangements, MFM & FMF, it is without a doubt (in my mind) that a MFM threesome is a more conducive arrangement for providing satisfaction to all three partners than a FMF threesome. A woman can much more easily satisfy two men than a man can satisfy two women. While a man might be able to satisfy two women, the number of ways in which he can accomplish such a feat is less than the number of ways a women can satisfy two men. This is because a womens body has a greater number of features that have the potential of providing a man pleasure. Conversely, those features that provide a man with pleasure, whether orifices or not, have the potential to provide the women with pleasure.
A mans body, not only has less distinct areas to engage, but his body is not as receptive as a womans to various forms of attention. For example, the physical attention paid to a mans chest by a women, generally, will not have the same impact as the physical attention a man gives to a womans chest.
It is because of the advantages MFM threesomes offer to women (center of attention ect) that I cannot quite understand why there is not a greater amount of discussion amongst women about MFM threesomes. Also, it is because of the advantages MFM threesomes offer to both male and female participants that I do not understand why the subject is not discussed more in comparison to other forms of threesomes.
Any ideas and input into this topic would be greatly appreciated.