Just because Chimera may have some views that aren't very popular does not mean he should not have the riight to put forth arguments for his views. I found the things he had to say, especially what he said to madam about inequality to be well put. I think the problem comes in to play because when someone starts talking about inequality then there usually follows the assumption of superiority whcih then gives birth to a bunch of different problems. Its the history of the concept of inequality which taints everyone's perception of Chimera's views. He has said numerous times in this thread that he does not believe that white are superior, only that he believes that the races are not all equal in all respects, I happen to agree with him to a point. I do not go far as to think that anyone of a certain race will be different than anyone else of a different race in a certain respect just because they are members of different races, but it is not unlikely that as a whole their are certains things other than skin pigmentation that are different among the races. This is not to say that the differences are momumental or even any more than slight.
The only reason I agree though is because it is almost irrefutable that not all men are created equal, but i think Chimera went about the wrong way of stating it or at least he failed to expound. I would put it "all men are equal only in respect to being human and all the 'rights' that entails, but when it comes to issues of intelligence, physical prowess etc, all humans are not equal." Think about it folks, equality is a very rigid matheamatical concept and should be applies with care. Two humans, one with an I.Q. of 120 and the other with 60 are not equal in respect to their measured intelligence. I am not equal, and i was not born equal to Charles Barkeley in respect to height. Does that make Charles Barkeley superior to me? Only in respect to our natural abilities to play basketball and reach apples in tall trees( by the way I would kill Mr. Barkeley in Golf, have you even seen him try to swing a club? it looks like he doing everything but trying to actually hit the ball). Should everybody be treated equally?? No. Someone who is mentally retarded although human should not be the president of the united states or hold any other such important position. Does this mean that the reatrded have no "right" to live, or do anything? No. They can serve their purpose and live meaningful lives, but only up to the point of their abilities. Does this mean that racism is justified? No. Because being a member of a race does not mean their is a limit to your abilites and that you should not afforded the same opportunites as anyone else.
Chimera has not said that he thinks white's are superior so far as I have read. He has only said that he believes it is better for society to keep the races separate and to not interbreed. Does this imply that he may feel that the genes of another race might "taint" the genepool of his race? Sure, it is implied but he may also be saying that white genes would pollute the genepool of blacks, hispanics, and asians. Do I agree with him? No. I think that the more the races mix the better because if there are certain differences between the races where one may have a slight advantage in a certain respect than the others than the sharing of genetic information would level out the differences and make the resulting "mix-race" stronger. Yes it would average it out a bit, but it would certainly not just resolve everything to the lowest common denominator. I think it extremely close minded to limit one's potential spouises based on purely race because if we were to "rate" everyone to see who is better at this or superior at that and were able to come up with a best possible candidate to mix our genes with and that person was of another race then logic would tell us that that person, regardless of race, would be the best person in which to mix our genes with for the next generation. Now I know that this brings up the whole notion of racial cleansing in order to get out the "undesirables" but I think natural selection will do that anyway in the long run, and the differences between people probably aren't substantial enough to warrant the extermination of any one whole person let alone an entire race. Its ridiculous to say that any one person who lacks trait X shouldn't have kids, because they may have other traits that are desirable.
I know I am going to have to explain some of my points further so I will do so when they are brought up I only ask that you treat my points with at least a little more respect than you treated Chimera's and only make substantial counter-points and arguments.
