this guy is my new hero. I'm moving to beijing.Originally posted by Defense Minster Chi Haotian@Aug 12 2005
According to what He Xin had in hand, the outstanding people of the world in attendance thought that in the 21st century a mere 20% of the worlds population will be sufficient to maintain the worlds economy and prosperity, the other 80% or 4/5 of the worlds population will be human garbage unable to produce new values. The people in attendance thought that this excess 80% population would be a trash population and "high-tech" means should be used to eliminate them gradually.[post=337278]Quoted post[/post]
well, achieving the 500m figure would involve killing off more than half their OWN people, so I doubt it. the 20% quote obviously refers to the fact that almost exactly 20% of the human race is - you guessed it - chinese.Originally posted by ChimeraTX@Aug 22 2005, 10:13 PM
I believe someone suggested 500,000,000 as a maximum population for humans.
I wonder if China will go through with it. :shrug:
[post=337326]Quoted post[/post]
China wants the Us for two reasons. Once, our land is the most plentiful. Now at 300 million, I am sure it has the capiacity to support many more. Most of Russua north of China is Siberia, a land that won't support that many more people.Originally posted by Steve26@Aug 22 2005, 01:55 PM
Erm ... it might be scary if it were at least slightly plausible. Dontcha think that if the Chinese wanted more "living space" they might consider invading their immediate neighbor to the north, which has three times the land mass of the US and a military that can't even rescue its own sailors from downed submarines??
Steve
[post=337298]Quoted post[/post]
I'd never heard of him before, but yep, it was pretty clear to me that he's a xenophobic scaremonger.Originally posted by jonb@Aug 23 2005, 01:29 AM
Thankfully, the Hal Turner Show is known to be a racist rag.
[post=337414]Quoted post[/post]
And would you be in the 80% or the 20%?? Maybe we should start a poll on this ...Originally posted by Dr Rock@Aug 23 2005, 09:45 AM
whatever; I still wholeheartedly support anyone who is serious about purging 80% of the human race.
[post=337456]Quoted post[/post]
And would you be in the 80% or the 20%??Originally posted by Steve26+Aug 23 2005, 02:12 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Steve26 @ Aug 23 2005, 02:12 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Dr Rock@Aug 23 2005, 09:45 AM
whatever; I still wholeheartedly support anyone who is serious about purging 80% of the human race.
[post=337456]Quoted post[/post]
does it really matter?Originally posted by Dr Rock+Aug 23 2005, 09:41 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr Rock @ Aug 23 2005, 09:41 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Originally posted by Steve26@Aug 23 2005, 02:12 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Dr Rock@Aug 23 2005, 09:45 AM
whatever; I still wholeheartedly support anyone who is serious about purging 80% of the human race.
[post=337456]Quoted post[/post]
And would you be in the 80% or the 20%??[post=337459]Quoted post[/post]
God, I hope you are trying to be funny! Because if you are for real, that would male you intrincally evil, worse than Hitler. To favor the murder of four billion people is absolutely horrendous.Originally posted by Dr Rock@Aug 23 2005, 02:15 PM
I think the question of how many people each nation should ideally contain is very much secondary to the question of HOW MANY HUMANS CAN I EXTERMINATE
[post=337485]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Freddie53@Aug 23 2005, 12:07 PM
The most humane way to bring our population under control is to limited the number of births. The population will then be reduced over time. I am not sure that we need to reduce the world population by 80 percent in every country. I would think that each country has its own needs. Canada the second largest nation in land size has only 35 million people. Their needs are different from
China, India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. Those nations are seriously overcrowded.
[post=337483]Quoted post[/post]
God, I hope you are trying to be funny! Because if you are for real, that would male you intrincally evil, worse than Hitler. To favor the murder of four billion people is absolutely horrendous.Originally posted by Freddie53+Aug 23 2005, 08:52 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Freddie53 @ Aug 23 2005, 08:52 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Dr Rock@Aug 23 2005, 02:15 PM
I think the question of how many people each nation should ideally contain is very much secondary to the question of HOW MANY HUMANS CAN I EXTERMINATE
[post=337485]Quoted post[/post]
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.