Seriously WHY

I have seen this stating in threads and I have heard women state this, And the movies make it out to be no big deal. Why do women feel it is okay to hit a man in the grion? The fact of the matter is some States have made it law that it is considered Sexual assault if you hit a man in the groin.

Seriously, I'd never hit a woman for slapping, punching or scratching me. BUT if she kicks me in the balls I swear I beat her down until she doesn't move anymore. Sounds harsh but you can't imagine the pain besides such a kick can do serious harm.
 
He's not - and he is right. Some rapists have a delusions about their relationship with the woman they attack as being something other than attacker and victim. I'm sure that can include caring for the victim's physical well-being despite the obvious incongruity we see in that.

I disagree, it is a moronic statement. The fact that a rapist thinks he is caring for his rape victim is a paradox.

That, and the other replies that TheRob has posted to this thread.
 
Seriously, I'd never hit a woman for slapping, punching or scratching me. BUT if she kicks me in the balls I swear I beat her down until she doesn't move anymore. Sounds harsh but you can't imagine the pain besides such a kick can do serious harm.

Why is she kicking you in the balls, in the first place.
 
I disagree, it is a moronic statement. The fact that a rapist thinks he is caring for his rape victim is a paradox.

That, and the other replies that TheRob has posted to this thread.

It is a paradox to us, P - I'm not saying attackers like that are right. Maybe I should have phrased it "I'm sure that can include believing themselves to be caring for the victim's physical well-being". Obviously, by definition almost, a rapist is not caring for his victims physical well being because he is taking by force, or threat of force, something she does not wish to give.

Think of it this way, many rapes occur without physical injury to the victim - those incidents are no less rape than an incident where the victim receives cuts, bruises or worse.
 
It is a paradox to us, P - I'm not saying attackers like that are right. Maybe I should have phrased it "I'm sure that can include believing themselves to be caring for the victim's physical well-being". Obviously, by definition almost, a rapist is not caring for his victims physical well being because he is taking by force, or threat of force, something she does not wish to give.

Think of it this way, many rapes occur without physical injury to the victim - those incidents are no less rape than an incident where the victim receives cuts, bruises or worse.

I understand what you are saying, but I don't agree that a rapists actions merit any justification whatsoever as to their concern for the victim. Its a moot point, in my opinion.

I have ZERO tolerance for violent and non-violent rapists.
 
I understand what you are saying, but I don't agree that a rapists actions merit any justification whatsoever as to their concern for the victim. Its a moot point, in my opinion.

I have ZERO tolerance for violent and non-violent rapists.

Sorry, you don't agree? That implies you think I said that a rapist's actions merit some justification as to his concern for the victim. Where did I say that? I never mentioned 'merit', or 'justification' - I clearly talk about 'delusion'. Which is what [I believe] Rob was talking about in the first place.

There is no apology for or tolerence of rape going on here.