Soft vs. hard sizes

bud said:
my flaccid size is 3.5 inches, erect its only 5 inches. so im pretty small for both i guess.

You not alone here.

By the way sometimes my flaccid size is 1.5" but erect 5-5.5". So even 3.5 times is the difference. :cool:
 
Well, i already told about this situation in another thread...:tongue: i had to bite my tongue about a guy that i thought was small...:redface: and he was not....:biggrin1:

Never judge a penis size when he is sleeping because he may surprise u when awakes...is my motto!!!:biggrin1:
 
A while back I had heard this shower vs. grower observation called "the great equalizer". lol - That smaller soft cocks tend to grow more than larger soft ones. I think that is misleading though, since many small soft cocks grow to below average size. Would that make them showers? In that case they are poor "equalizers". :p

Mine is 4" soft (when relaxed and not cold) and about 5.25" hard. I suppose you'd call that a shower, which is kind of silly really.
 
Something like 2.5" soft at times to nearly 8" hard. Up until about age 20 masturbating I couldn't consistently get larger than 6". I was really tone at 130 pounds in high school and criticized for having a perfect body except my dick.
 
Mike13 said:
Something like 2.5" soft at times to nearly 8" hard. Up until about age 20 masturbating I couldn't consistently get larger than 6". I was really tone at 130 pounds in high school and criticized for having a perfect body except my dick.

Wow...a 2,5" grows to become an 8" !!! Incredible!
 
stud_hunter said:
The other day a girlfriend of mine told me she thinks guys whose cocks are smaller when soft get bigger when they get hard. Any truth to that? I haven't really noticed a pattern with a couple of exceptions. My ex was 4 and a quarter soft and about 6 in. hard. The guy I see now is less than 3 in. soft but it grows to almost 8 in. hard. So maybe there's something to that? As a side note I'll say it's so exciting to watch his cock grow from soft to hard. It just keeps growing and growing until it's morphed into this perfect pleasure-giving machine! :biggrin1: :tongue: :biggrin1:

I can vouch you're right. I'm smalll when soft -- about 3 inches. But when I'm hard, I'm 7", and 5 3/4" round. I continue to be surprise how small my cock is when it's really shrunk, and how big it is when it's fully swollen and stiff. As you indicate, it's a pleasure watching your guy get so big.
 
The other day a girlfriend of mine told me she thinks guys whose cocks are smaller when soft get bigger when they get hard. Any truth to that? I haven't really noticed a pattern with a couple of exceptions. My ex was 4 and a quarter soft and about 6 in. hard. The guy I see now is less than 3 in. soft but it grows to almost 8 in. hard. So maybe there's something to that? As a side note I'll say it's so exciting to watch his cock grow from soft to hard. It just keeps growing and growing until it's morphed into this perfect pleasure-giving machine! :biggrin1: :tongue: :biggrin1:

I am a new member and just happened across this thread. Allow me to add my two cents.

Please refer to my response to another question:

http://www.lpsg.org/underwear-clothing-and-appearance-issues/31674-common-questions-4.html#post608206

When I am soft I am 2” x 2”; however, when I have an erection, I am 9” x 7”. As you can see, I am quite a GROWER.

I have only been with one person in my entire life and that is my wife. We have been married 32 years and she is still impressed (and likes to watch) with my ability to GROW from 2” to 9”.
 
Congradulations on being married for 32 years. Now growing from 2 inches soft to 9 inches hard is extraordinary, lol. If serious that's quite impressive.
 
Interesting topic, and timely for me. I never thought I was "hung" until last month. My soft length is 1" to over 4" but walking around I'm a statue of David with big balls. Nothing showing. I thought I must have a small dick and my wifes saying I'm hurting her is some kind of ego boosting thing.

I do think big balls make your cock look smaller. Hard I am 6.5" X 6.25" I put a coke can behind my erection and you couldn't see it except about a 1/4" along each edge. Compared to the coke can, now I get the perspective that my dick is somewhat large.

Being 6'4" and 255lbs, I think you just get a different perspective. If I was a smaller stature that package might stand out more. It's when my wife grabs my cock and her hands don't go more than slightly half way around it that I get another perspective. And the teeth thing on bj's.

Yeah, my small soft length made me think I wasn't big. Now I learn about showers and growers and I am a grower, for sure. And I'm not long hard. But being SO thick, it looks short. Now that I realize the shaft is exceptionally thick, the length perportion is fine, I think 6.5" is decent enough to relax after all these years...lol. I'm just a different kind of big.
 
For me, it's mostly a temperature thing. In the summer, I usually walk around with a large soft size, but in winter, not so much. If you look at my gallery, those are all done in a toasty envirnment. If my apartment was 3 degrees colder that day, I wouldn't have taken the pics.

One year, when I was still getting used to this, I bought a pair of shorts in spring that seemed to fit me fine. During the first heatwave, I couldn't wear them! I didn't notice until I was already out walking, then I noticed people staring. Man, did I start blushing!

Also, my level of hydration can be a factor, believe it or not.
 
normal average..(not cold) 5.5 flaccid and 7.5-8.0 erect.... but if cold it can be as small as 3.0 flaccid... always had that fear that someone would accidentally see it when it's cold like George on Seinfeld...:eek:
 
Length is the standard as visual difference in the range of sizes is more obvious and less evenly distributed that is girth. In practice variations in girth or more noticable, but to the naked eye a long penis is the prize possession in terms of its ability to get attention.

Good point. Perhaps penises increase more consistently in terms of total volume flacid versus total volume erect, but that's distributed differently in terms of length versus girth. So a penis that is short but thick flacid, and becomes long but thin when erect, might be increasing in total volume about as much as one that is thin flacid but appears relatively long for that state, and then turns into a thick but relatively short erect penis. Oh, the need for so much more scientific research and data on this subject!

Also, as has been pointed out, flacid states can vary a lot, so any comparison would have to start out on some consistent basis, such as a flacid measurement after coming out of a warm shower.
 
My cock is pretty small when soft. But there's a lot of skin....enough to grow into the 8" when hard.

The other day a girlfriend of mine told me she thinks guys whose cocks are smaller when soft get bigger when they get hard. Any truth to that? I haven't really noticed a pattern with a couple of exceptions. My ex was 4 and a quarter soft and about 6 in. hard. The guy I see now is less than 3 in. soft but it grows to almost 8 in. hard. So maybe there's something to that? As a side note I'll say it's so exciting to watch his cock grow from soft to hard. It just keeps growing and growing until it's morphed into this perfect pleasure-giving machine! :biggrin1: :tongue: :biggrin1:
 
Congradulations on being married for 32 years. Now growing from 2 inches soft to 9 inches hard is extraordinary, lol. If serious that's quite impressive.

Thank you for your congratulations.
No brag - just fact.
Yeah, my wife thinks it is extraordinary too.
I have some old poloroid pictures from my younger days; however, who would want to see a 54 year old's penis. Ya know? So, that is why I have no pics posted. I mean I am fit and trim at 6' - 1" but, 54 ... leave it to the younger men to show. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvw33d
I have to admit, that would be interesting to watch! :shock: My hubby is at the other end of the spectrum... almost no difference in size from soft to hard. He's an honest 8x6 hard, and stays 7 plus in length with very close to the same girth when he's soft. (No, I'm not complaining LOL)

There was a thread a while back that discussed something about how some men have a more efficient "control system" than others... something to do with how the blood flow is controlled for erection. I think it said that those with a more efficient system were growers, and the less efficient were showers...? I suppose that would explain why his size hardly changes, at least. He always seems to be at least half erect compared to other men I've known. Hmmm, does that make him an inefficient husband? :lmao: I'm still not complaining!

:flirt: