So I don't know about the rest of you, but I personally am sick of all the people on here who will take ANY opportunity to rant and rave and bitch about how wrong circumcision is. You can have a normal thread talking about something almost entirely unrelated, but if there's a mention of whether the cock involved is cut or uncut, they will immediately jump in with the typical rant about how they were "violated as a child, having something so wrongfully taken from them, nobody should EVER be circumcised, blah blah blah" It's that last part that particularly bugs me. If you feel so violated and can't appreciate that your parents were looking out for you well-being, then so be it. But don't rant on for pages about it telling other people how wrong it is and that they shouldn't have it done to their kids. Fact of the matter is that cut cocks ARE easier to keep clean. Doesn't mean uncut cocks are dirty, I actually really like uncut cocks and enjoy having a boyfriend who is uncut. And while it's all well and easy for us to sit around as ADULTS and say we can clean our dicks perfectly well, the same can't be said for a CHILD, especially because the foreskin often cannot retract fully until puberty. For THAT reason, (and religious reasons obviously in some cases) parents choose to have their children circumcised. Anyone have anything to add to this? Other reasons offered for circumcision and how valid they are? I fully expect some flames for this, but let's TRY to keep it civil, because I WOULD like to hear some calm and well-reasoned responsed from uncut guys, being cut myself.