- Joined
- Jan 4, 2007
- Posts
- 1,361
- Media
- 16
- Likes
- 344
- Points
- 303
- Location
- Fort Lauderdale, Florida
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Recently ran across this post and just thought I'd see what you guys think.
Bottoms have small cocks
---------------------------------------------------------------
Personally I'm going to have to say this is untrue in my opinion, as there have been many cases where I've meet guys who have big dicks that only bottom, because their previous bottoms have made them feel as though being big is a bad thing and that it hurts the bottoms.. and its difficult once a guy gets this mindset for them to change it.
Though in some cases it is true.. like once i had an encounter where the guy had said he was a top before we meet, but once we meet he jumped on my cock in an instant.. and he had a really small one.. but OMG he rode my cock for hours.. so in that case he was a bottom though he didn't want to admit it..
I do have to admit that sometimes I think its funny when guys with super small ones think their tops.. but then again sometimes size isn't important if they know how to use it.. but some are just so small there really isn't much that can be done with it.. I like knowing I'm with a man so I prefer a guy to be at least average, but then again in the case of the small dicked bottom.. that was a super hot experience..
----------------------------------------------------------------
Article from Above Link:
----------
Recently a cock-size study -- partly paid for by taxpayer money -- came to light and has conservatives up in arms.
The research looked at whether tops or bottoms were more likely to be well endowed. According to the research, bottoms had smaller dicks than tops.
This 2009 paper was part of a group of studies that obtained $900,000 in grant money in a single year, given out by the National Institutes of Health. It is unknown how much money went directly to this specific case, although one of the students involved in the project said the funding only covered the cost to "analyse and write up" the research findings.
About 1,000 men in New York were surveyed, and given a free movie pass, for the study.
However, the sabres are being rattled. The Traditional Values Coalition drew attention to the report after reviewing how NIH grants were given out.
President of the Traditional Values Coalition, Andrea Lafferty, said: 'This country is broke and we cannot spend money on this kind of stuff. Weve got nameless, faceless bureaucrats who thought this was a good use of taxpayer money."
Given that this was a survey rather than an actual measurement we seriously doubt the findings are accurate, making it an even bigger waste. But if they're looking for cock-measuring volunteers, we'd be more than happy to do our part.
---------------------------------
Related Articles:
Fox News: Your tax dollars measure gay dong [Xtra]
US government under-fire for study linking penis size to whether gay men top or bottom [Pink News]
Bottoms have small cocks
---------------------------------------------------------------
Personally I'm going to have to say this is untrue in my opinion, as there have been many cases where I've meet guys who have big dicks that only bottom, because their previous bottoms have made them feel as though being big is a bad thing and that it hurts the bottoms.. and its difficult once a guy gets this mindset for them to change it.
Though in some cases it is true.. like once i had an encounter where the guy had said he was a top before we meet, but once we meet he jumped on my cock in an instant.. and he had a really small one.. but OMG he rode my cock for hours.. so in that case he was a bottom though he didn't want to admit it..
I do have to admit that sometimes I think its funny when guys with super small ones think their tops.. but then again sometimes size isn't important if they know how to use it.. but some are just so small there really isn't much that can be done with it.. I like knowing I'm with a man so I prefer a guy to be at least average, but then again in the case of the small dicked bottom.. that was a super hot experience..
----------------------------------------------------------------
Article from Above Link:
----------
Recently a cock-size study -- partly paid for by taxpayer money -- came to light and has conservatives up in arms.
The research looked at whether tops or bottoms were more likely to be well endowed. According to the research, bottoms had smaller dicks than tops.
This 2009 paper was part of a group of studies that obtained $900,000 in grant money in a single year, given out by the National Institutes of Health. It is unknown how much money went directly to this specific case, although one of the students involved in the project said the funding only covered the cost to "analyse and write up" the research findings.
About 1,000 men in New York were surveyed, and given a free movie pass, for the study.
However, the sabres are being rattled. The Traditional Values Coalition drew attention to the report after reviewing how NIH grants were given out.
President of the Traditional Values Coalition, Andrea Lafferty, said: 'This country is broke and we cannot spend money on this kind of stuff. Weve got nameless, faceless bureaucrats who thought this was a good use of taxpayer money."
Given that this was a survey rather than an actual measurement we seriously doubt the findings are accurate, making it an even bigger waste. But if they're looking for cock-measuring volunteers, we'd be more than happy to do our part.
---------------------------------
Related Articles:
Fox News: Your tax dollars measure gay dong [Xtra]
US government under-fire for study linking penis size to whether gay men top or bottom [Pink News]
