And who said really, that women must wear bras?
I have on occasion worn lycra shorts in public without underwear. It is quite revealing, especially if I get erect. The thing is I feel so free and out there when I do it.
Is this considered crude and indecent? Could I get arrested? I figure if a woman can go braless and have erect nipples, how is it any different?
I don't notice too many looks though, I would expect more. I try to talk to women, and some reluctant to talk. Would saying "please pardon my shorts, they are bit revealing" be too much?
It's not the same. People should wear underwear. Probably the main reason, is the inevitable urine dribbles. Underwear is a bit like a "mild diaper," if you want to get technical. I have never understood the modern "need" for bras. What are they for? Somebody just decided that breasts now need support? And what are "erect" nipples? Are they much the same as just larger nipples? And then, if the breasts are "sexual," then they aren't deemed "sexual" during the practical necessity of breastfeeding, nor quite as "sexual" as the genetalia.
And don't underwear also offer protection against sensitive penises chafing against one's pants?
I think women probably could reasonably go braless, without people going underwearless, it's not the same. Of course if women go braless, they need to at least wear a T-shirt or something, as the breasts apparently are somewhat "sexual" unless breastfeeding.
Lycra might be okay?, but with underwear. Clothing should be about practicality, decency, and staying warm. Not "showing off."