White Massive Monster
- Thread starter hotcockalex
- Start date
The ORIGINAL pic is quite real though not huge as some think, its the angle V height V perception. A mistake some can make with upclose pics , which is why I never care for them . The ones from Zoig.com are very laughable and are CONSISTENTLY Photoshopped to hell and back !!!
HH
I can do a quick photoshop analysis. This picture is fake to 100%. And I even want to add that everbody who doesn't recognize this is blind.
If you're talking about the very first pic in this thread you seem not to know when i picture is faked. This one is. Believe me.
Why is it fake? Tell us please so we can know. Just saying you did an analysis doesn't magically make it. As far as I know the original member was legit. You'll have to explain to me how his dick can become fake ^-^
Attachments
Last edited:
I'm not talking about any member or cock. Just the very first picture posted in this thread.
First of all patterns don't match at some points. Secondly there are some edges not clean cut out.
I don't say that he does not have a big dick or whatever, just that this picture was altered.
D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
His unit and the remote are both touching the table, imo.
The light comes from the camera flash.
It causes his unit to cast a shadow because, as a cylinder, it's extreme right edge is some distance above the table, even if the bottom side is actually touching.
The remote, lying flat on the table, casts no shadow.
There may be some subterfuge there that I'm missing, but there is no perspective stunt.
Last edited:
The first picture is the exact same picture that the member Simonpenislover posted. All his other pictures point to the same size. So what do you mean about patterns and what do you mean about some edges not being clean cut? You have to be sure of what you're saying as that would mean that the user doctored his pictures, which is very improbable as he also used to show it on cam. And close up, it was the same size as that first pictures.
So please, if it's fake, clearly point it out with precise info. What you said is very vague. (Sorry I'm being picky, it's that substantial claims of fakeness are never precised with anything other than "pseudo" knowledge and a lack of factual proof. It just pisses me off in the long run, especially when it's about someone that has distinct proof of being real).
pseudo knowledge? you know what? Believe me or not, I don't give a.... I also could say there's a lack of factual proof that it is not altered.
There were tons of fakers spotted and convicted at LPSG and you talk about "claims of fakeness are never precised".
So you're entitled to your own opinion. Still I say this picture is altered. And I don't care about other pics, cam or whatever. I am talking about this very picture.
There were tons of fakers spotted and convicted at LPSG and you talk about "claims of fakeness are never precised".
So you're entitled to your own opinion. Still I say this picture is altered. And I don't care about other pics, cam or whatever. I am talking about this very picture.
Fact : All the pictures in this thread where on Simonpenislover's account.
Fact : All of his pictures were reportedly unaltered.
Pseudoscience spagethi monster theory : "First of all patterns don't match at some points. Secondly there are some edges not clean cut out, also, if you cross-invert shade the image and look a the cryptology, you can clearly see hidden signs of nazism. Oh, btw, I won't point out where. Just believe me. If you can't see it, well, what can I say!"
Fact : The burden of proof lies on the accuser to show that the original picture, that was claimed as unfake, is fake.
Fact : Snakebyte just got pwned by facts.
bored2009
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2009
- Posts
- 914
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 34
- Points
- 248
- Location
- Lexington (Kentucky, United States)
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
The first pic is indeed REAL , being that it was taken so closeup to make the dick look bigger than it is you see no perspective but it's REAL and probably 7-8" . The other pics from the ZOIG.com site are really not even worth mentioning they are so completely laughable!
HH
guys
please research photography before you start shouting "fake"
sharp edge theory???
go learn about depth of field
Depth of field - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
please research photography before you start shouting "fake"
sharp edge theory???
go learn about depth of field
Depth of field - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
TinyPrincess
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
- Posts
- 16,244
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 32,717
- Points
- 393
- Location
- Copenhagen (Capital Region, Denmark)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Excellent article and I would agree with you except the picture IS NOT a professional shot, in other words it was taken with a "point and shoot" camera and your theory is not relevent.
so wait... we're supposed to believe you have an 11 inch cock based on a pic taken from low down, angled upwards, and with you leaning back in it. while skepticism of a cock we can all see is twice the length of a wii controller is almost half the size of yours.
right.
Similar threads
