Who said orgies are immoral? :wink:
Well I don't think that "virtual orgies" are immoral, meaning that as people are busy making babies, other neighbors in crowded housing arrangements or overcrowded shantytowns may hear them reproducing, and also "join in" in reproducing with their own mates as well. Had I been married when I heard a neighbor having sex through my thin apartment wall some time ago, I likely would have "joined in" and let the baby-making naturally spread a bit throughout the apartment complex. But only with my own wife. As "huge" as the human race now is, at any given moment, probably many millions of people are naturally engaged in sex, nearly half not using any means of "birth control." Perhaps some of them are actually within hearing range, that some neighbors may hear their sexual activities at times. Some people even hear neighbor toilets flushing. Just the natural sounds of life. I mean that actual orgies are immoral, because they imply spreading STDs, and not knowing so well who the daddies of all the babies that might result, would be. Society has an interest in promoting stable families, and parents taking their responsible duties to provide for and love their children. But even Prince had a song entitled "Erotic City," which probably includes the implication, that cities are so full of so many people, that quite a lot of sex could be going on in most every city at night. Every night, in any city of any size, additional babies are coming to life, and there's so many fertile vaginas naturally pushing out more babies, each and every day, in most every hospital, in home births, in birthing clinics or with the help of midwives.
Ok then, I will edit my statement...
I guess you could just travel around the world, skipping from city to city, sleeping in broom closets with 40 other people, sharing your morning wood with everyone, and listening to your neighbors "making babies". Perfect vacation, eh? 
<emoticon of sarcasm> If you wanted a dose of reality, you could suffer from starvation, support your 20 children on $1 a day, and catch dengue fever too.
Thanks for improving your statement, but I am a pronatalist. I do not believe in imposing any population "control" upon humans. If humans are able to continue to enjoy reproducing even in cramped housing conditions, more power to them. More people to enjoy life. I do not believe in use of "birth control," so I welcome families to continue to grow large naturally, even if they currently happen to live in small homes. The solution is to improve freedom and build more housing, not at all to bother to go against nature to "limit" naturally-rising human numbers. Humans are social creatures, and are quite capable of both surviving and thriving, even at extreme population densities, if or as need be.
I merely say that morning wood is to be expected, not that people should seek out any sort of immoral sexual experiences. And I am generally not willing to pay extra to rent more rooms. I don't think I have really seen much morning wood in college dorms or in the cramped military housing arrangements, as people find ways to be a bit private or discrete about such things. But one time I did go on a beach trip with a Church youth group, and we rented a beach house with 7 bedrooms. Of course women had their area and we had ours. The one married couple got their own private bedroom (for obvious and understandable reasons that I would much agree with), while the rest of us had to share 3 or 4 people per bedroom. Didn't see any morning wood on that trip, but in my perspective at least, and most everybody else's as well, "the more the merrier." The more people we could get to go, the cheaper the trip would be, as a rented beach house isn't cheap, unless we can divide the cost by many people. We had 20-some people, so it wasn't expensive.
Anyway, were I inclined to travel and visit the world, I wouldn't have much any adversion to "experiencing life," or sleeping in their "broomcloset" small huts, at least if they are friendly and welcoming, and clean enough. Part of the experience of seeing the world. Americans are sometimes too materialist and spoiled. I would not object to hearing neighbors making babies at night, as wouldn't that just be another sound of nature, or the "music" of natural beautiful human population growth? Or do we think that a world having naturally risen to some 6.7 billion human beings all alive at once, should have no curious consequences? I consider it wonderfully beautiful, to welcome the human race to blossom in size naturally, and to use the already population-driven technology growth, in support of our rising "huge" numbers.
And please don't confuse poverty with population. As I read somewhere, there is nothing about having money in one's pockets that magically sterilizes the reproductive organs. People could be well-to-do, and still enjoy having 20 children. In the old 1950s version of "Cheaper By the Dozen," that was the main real reason for their large house. That they had 12 children, apparently closely-spaced in age and height, due to the natural lack of use of "birth control." Most people back then, believed in welcoming the natural flow of human life, and did not bother to try to "space" their babies, but babies happened as they happen. I believe such natural flow of human life, should continue naturally unhindered in modern times, no matter how "huge" our numbers, as more and more people would be glad to live, and wherever there are parents who can somehow add to their families, more fellow human beings to experience life, so much the better.
