circumcision

Reticent horse

Experimental Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Posts
73
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
153
Sexuality
No Response
There should no longer be any debate that circumcision is a dangerous and unnecessary violation of a boy's right to choose. It is a disgrace that people persist in genitally mutilating their children.
 

witch

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Posts
498
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
163
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
no..... he can wait until he hits 18, then he can have one. along with that tattoo or piercing he has been begging for every Christmas. ;) <j>
 

DC_DEEP

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
8,714
Media
0
Likes
93
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
no..... he can wait until he hits 18, then he can have one. along with that tattoo or piercing he has been begging for every Christmas. ;) <j>
So you're saying I shouldn't get my kid pierced and tattooed all over when he's 3 days old? How dare you!
 

B_dxjnorto

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Posts
6,876
Media
0
Likes
199
Points
193
Location
Southwest U.S.
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
Tremendous health, maintenance and aesthetic benefits.
Where do people get this stuff? Statistically there's no difference in overall health between intact and cut. The difference is circ takes ten, twenty or thirty years off your sex life, depending on how much the good "doc" amputates.

I could barely orgasm by the time I was thirty-seven and I am in excellent health.
 

Ed69

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2006
Posts
2,890
Media
0
Likes
1,276
Points
258
Location
Oregon (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Not a chance, my ovaries are well in tact, LOL Interesting analogy that since I believe in circumcision that I would not be fit to be a mother.....you know nothing about me to make such frank statement

All I need to know is that you are ignorant enough to mutilate a male infant.You sound just like my mother,and deserve evey bad night you've had in bed with a MAN!So you go on believing you're right,you will have to answer for your view.My mother still can't look me in the eye when she ask's how things are in the bedroom.:eek:
 

Oncamale28

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Posts
610
Media
18
Likes
74
Points
173
Location
Hawaii
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
... i would not, and if he wanted to on his own, then that would be his choice, although in most cases there would be no need ...i would also educate on hygene so that he would be in the best of health and able to enjoy himself to the fullest...
 

Peter20

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 5, 2007
Posts
279
Media
31
Likes
3,270
Points
598
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Yeah, I definately would circumcise my son! It's much better being circumcised. My brother wasn't circumcised at birth but got problems with his foreskin a few years ago (at 15). He wished he was circumcised at birth just as I am. He's now circumcised too and is very glad he is. I've also read that 1 out of 5 boys get problems with their foreskin if they're not circumcised. So, yep, I would circumcise my son(s)!!
 

DC_DEEP

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
8,714
Media
0
Likes
93
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
That infant PA really makes diaper changing difficult.
No, not at all! Now, the full-body tattoos on the newborn can present a few difficulties, but it's worth it. They don't feel it, and it saves them the agony of getting tattooed later in life. The facial tattoos have to be carefully cleaned until they heal.

Yeah, I definately would circumcise my son! It's much better being circumcised. My brother wasn't circumcised at birth but got problems with his foreskin a few years ago (at 15). He wished he was circumcised at birth just as I am. He's now circumcised too and is very glad he is. I've also read that 1 out of 5 boys get problems with their foreskin if they're not circumcised. So, yep, I would circumcise my son(s)!!
Citation, please.
 

SteveHd

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Posts
3,678
Media
0
Likes
79
Points
183
Location
Daytona
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
... I've also read that 1 out of 5 boys get problems with their foreskin if they're not circumcised.
Is the source of that CircList? Even if we allow the "1 out of 5" as valid then 4 out of 5 don't have problems. In Finland adult circumcisions run about 1 in 16,600. Not many "problems" in non-circ'ing counties for some odd reason.
 
1

127211

Guest
When i was born i had a problem, i cant remember what it was called, but my penis was conected to my skin, therefore leading to me having to have surgery, when i was 2. I suppose you could call this circumsision, also people say it is much healthier to be circumsised
 

DC_DEEP

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
8,714
Media
0
Likes
93
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
Is the source of that CircList? Even if we allow the "1 out of 5" as valid then 4 out of 5 don't have problems. In Finland adult circumcisions run about 1 in 16,600. Not many "problems" in non-circ'ing counties for some odd reason.
Those aren't bad odds. I checked on the Centers for Disease Control of the US Government; this is a fact copied directly from their website and pasted here:

"During 1999--2002,among children aged 2--11 years, 41% had dental caries in their primary teeth. Forty-two percent of children and adolescents aged 6--19 years and approximately 90% of adults had dental caries in their permanent teeth."

For those of you who don't know, "caries" is the clinical term for "cavities." If you believe in cutting off part of a child's penis, because he may or may not have a 20% chance of "problems" in adulthood, how about pulling all primary and permanent teeth in all children and adolescents to prevent those 42% to 90% chance of having cavities? It is absolutely as logical, and at least with all the teeth pulled, prosthetics are available if desired. I'm not sure that I've ever heard of prosthetic foreskins.

When i was born i had a problem, i cant remember what it was called, but my penis was conected to my skin, therefore leading to me having to have surgery, when i was 2. I suppose you could call this circumsision, also people say it is much healthier to be circumsised
I really get tired of statements like this. What people say this, how is it healthier, what studies were done... or is it just "people say, so I believe it, and I can make false statements without taking responsibility for them..."??
 

B_dxjnorto

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Posts
6,876
Media
0
Likes
199
Points
193
Location
Southwest U.S.
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
Yeah, I definately would circumcise my son! It's much better being circumcised. My brother wasn't circumcised at birth but got problems with his foreskin a few years ago (at 15). He wished he was circumcised at birth just as I am. He's now circumcised too and is very glad he is. I've also read that 1 out of 5 boys get problems with their foreskin if they're not circumcised. So, yep, I would circumcise my son(s)!!
Another sad product of a culture where genital cutting is the norm. I do pity your brother. I'm sure he could have kept his skin. 15 years and off with it. A pity.
 

chico8

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Posts
727
Media
0
Likes
21
Points
163
Location
Chico
Sexuality
No Response
When i was born i had a problem, i cant remember what it was called, but my penis was conected to my skin, therefore leading to me having to have surgery, when i was 2. I suppose you could call this circumsision, also people say it is much healthier to be circumsised

The vast majority of foreskins are attached to the glans, sometimes up until puberty. Either you had such a tight foreskin that you couldn't urinate, or you were unlucky to have a doctor who was ignorant of basic human physiology.

Circumcision has nothing to do with health and everything to do with ignorance . I'm sorry you got whacked.
 

D_Timmy Toelicker

Just Browsing
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Posts
66
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
151
Why not circumcise them at birth? It'll save them the trouble of having to do it when they are older, circumcision is just better, easy to clean, looks nicer, and that's just the way it is.