Stronzo said:
...There's the thing quoted verbatim in its entirety....
Liar--you have misquoted me and I take extreme exception to it. You posted only
part of what I said.
Here is what I said in that thread:
Lex said:
I had debated whether to post earlier since any time I (or anyone) say (says) anything to you that does not include the idea of me (them) kissing your ass, you go off, but really, I (and a lot of people) am (are) rather tired of tip-toeing around your rather fragile psyche.
Since the day you got here, you have been telling everyone who can read what and how to do. DC DEEP made this cogent observation in a thread not long ago. I'm sure you recall reading it. Get a clue: We were already here and doing just fine--bigots, fags, dykes, racists, religious zealots, atheists and all. It takes all kinds last I checked.
The fact that you have a problem with my tone is just that--your problem. I don't jump in every time you post. When I feel the need to post something, I will. Period. Whether a post is in accordance with you or not is of no consequence. I will not apologize for posting with conviction, nor will I try to post less (as Zora has) to placate others.
You piss and rant with your venom and histrionics about heterosexuals and Christians, making sweeping generalizations and looking down your upper-crust nose at them as a whole without for a second considering that this behavior is the EXACT behavior that you decry in them.
That is the ONLY issue I take with you: That you behave exactly like those who you would have change or go away. Treating others poorly because they treat us (homosexuals) poorly gets us nowhere. And, no, that does not mean you need to do anything about it, except be clear that when I disagree with you, this is usually the underlying cause.
You've done this before you know, intentionally not used an entire post that does not suit your purpose while saying that it, in fact, is the entire post.
Stronzo said:
....
I've never known you to admit fault once on this site Lex and apologize. That would be a fine day if you did ...
To the best of my knowledge you've never once actually said you're sorry or that you did the wrong thing.
You don't know what you are talking about. I have aplogized on this site before. For example, I apologized openly to Buddy Boy after the DMW drama. You were here for that--as you'll recall, you were the one trying to tell us all to get over it. People who had spent years interacting with this person. Drop it, you said. As if you have dropped the connection you made in your few months of time with WindTalkerWays or Webster.
For the record, I only apologize when I feel badly about something I have done.
What good is an empty apology? Unlike the majority of people, I tend to believe that my apologies mean something because I only give them when they are heartfelt. That is why you have never received an apology from me. Because I am not fake.
I have apologized to many members here. I just haven't apologized to you. I don't feel bad for saying you look down your "upper curst" nose at people because you do and everyone here knows it. You've called yourself an elitist before. You revel in it.
Remember when you kept reporting people who said you name meant "Shit" after you have joked about it with Rubi. That is the type of stuff that tanks your credibility. 90% of the posts you reported were not acted upon because they were, in the Mod Team's view, disagreements, which are clearly covered in the terms of service and not something that will be dealt with unless they disrupt the board.
No one can cling more tightly to a double standard than you do (credit to another member). Even your closest "friends" here recognize that. In the text you quoted, I basically paraphrased what DC Deep
said here. But, I am a villian for it, right? Right. All because you don't like me.
Let's please note that I don't care who likes me. For the record, here is what DC_Deep said:
DC_Deep said:
...Stronzo made a few excellent posts, but from the time he joined, he wanted to mold LPSG into what he wanted it to be, he got pissy with long-standing members who tried to guide him, and he was brutal to newcomers who didn't fit his mold. There's something not quite right about that, it reminds me of someone who goes into a vegetarian restaurant, and has a screaming fit when they won't serve him a steak.
Stronzo could be very charming, but more often he seemed to get a kick from pointing out his Brahmin origins and telling everyone how much better that made him than anyone else. Yawn. Too bad he was not putting his intellect to better use; when he could actually do something besides attack other people or stir up controversy, I liked him. He just got on the wrong path, it seemed. I don't know what went on with the moderators in the last sweep of bannings, but I haven't seen one yet that I didn't think was probably merited.
I get it. It should not be about like or dislike and yet you show your like and dislike all the time. You dislike Matthew, so you skip over the post where Pecker called you out in the Spladle thread and rage on about Matthew. You overlook DC's rather accurate portrayal of you because you "like" him. You try to assure Bliss you are not angry with here when we all could see how upset you were that your "core group" had all but abandoned you in that old thread.
You blast your closet friends in PM when they don't agree with you on the board and because somehow, your paradign of comaraderie requires all parties to always agree and stick up for each other, even when they think you are wrong. That's crap.
You talk out of both sides of your face, Stronzo. All the time. You implore my friendship in PM while blasting me on the board. Dr. Dilznick already demonstrated with a 2-minute search how easy it is to show that you get on whichever side of the argument suits you best.
I knew it would only be a matter of time before you somehow made Spaldle's departure your latest opportunity to garner attention and stir shit. I even knew you would somehow try to drag me in the mud with you. Everyone here can see you for what you are.
This discussion is not about you.