hardcore porn

[jonb]

Originally posted by madame_zora@Sep 19 2005, 10:06 PM
The problem is that not everyone's taste is the same. Not all men like barbie dolls with bolt-on boobs and not all women like the same kind of guys, but porn stars seem to be mainly cookie-cutter types or downright ugly, and I tend to like more unusual looking people. Fucking mannequins has never appealed much to me, I know you know what I mean. And the stiff, businesslike fucking is just boring.

[post=344902]Quoted post[/post]​

All very true. Just a very realistic appearance would help. No silicone investments.

 

[madame_zora]

You know, the porn industry is so successful, it makes me wonder if most straight guys aren't pretty happy with things the way they are. I have gotten used to the idea that lpsg houses a lot of exceptional people in more ways than just dick size, I wonder if this isn't another one. I mean, you look at movies, and while there are some good looking men, there are still some very successful male actors cast in leading roles who are certainly not attractive, still paired up with glamour girls. Very rarely can a less-than-hot female actress do well. I think porn is mostly a mirror of society in general.

Personally, I'd like a more amateurish porn production, one that you could imagine being two real people just doing what comes natural, but I wonder if it would have much mainstream appeal. I'd like to believe I was seeing actual arousal instead of fake moaning and orgasms, a real desire on the part of the woman to suck cock instead of a theatrical production about it, I think our views on what sex is all about are reflected in these hideous creations.

 

[11incher]

Originally posted by madame_zora@Sep 24 2005, 02:00 PM
You know, the porn industry is so successful, it makes me wonder if most straight guys aren't pretty happy with things the way they are. I have gotten used to the idea that lpsg houses a lot of exceptional people in more ways than just dick size, I wonder if this isn't another one. I mean, you look at movies, and while there are some good looking men, there are still some very successful male actors cast in leading roles who are certainly not attractive, still paired up with glamour girls. Very rarely can a less-than-hot female actress do well. I think porn is mostly a mirror of society in general.

Personally, I'd like a more amateurish porn production, one that you could imagine being two real people just doing what comes natural, but I wonder if it would have much mainstream appeal. I'd like to believe I was seeing actual arousal instead of fake moaning and orgasms, a real desire on the part of the woman to suck cock instead of a theatrical production about it, I think our views on what sex is all about are reflected in these hideous creations.

[post=346127]Quoted post[/post]​

Why is every woman in porno called a "Porn Star" Not everyone is a star.

 

[madame_zora]

Why, Mr. Clinton, you wouldn't be insinuating that our former pres. watches porn?

 

[jonb]

He likes fat chicks.

 

[madame_zora]

Originally posted by jonb@Sep 25 2005, 01:17 AM
He likes fat chicks.

[post=346267]Quoted post[/post]​

Hey, I resemble that remark!

 

[D_Humper E Bogart]

Anyway, nothing wrong with being a flesh vampire...

Personally, I'm more for "women posing" then straight sex. Teasing is more fun IMHO.

 

[BruceSter]

Originally posted by Bill Clinton@Sep 24 2005, 04:37 PM
I've seen some horrid hardcore pornography, any sort of inane bullshit that appears by typing in the Limewire search engine is scripted assembly line fucking.

It will always start with some wrinkled hideous man spouting off vulgar phrases like "I'm going to stuff a cock in your mouth and fuck your ass" and a small petite girl screaming and moaning while having a semi-erect 6 inch penis flailing in and out of a glistening pussy, of course before this there would be the 35 minute blowjob and vagina licking scene with the cliche moans. The sets are unrealistic and to "movie like". For they all look as if they are being filmed on a furniture store showroom, there won't be a couch cushion out of place or a pillow on the floor, let alone any article of clothing save a misplaced shirt or a shoe.

I agree with Bruce here, I just want pornography to be more natural.

[post=346245]Quoted post[/post]​

Hi there-

It gives me an enormous emotional rise to see my opinion is the one of a former president. But yeah, that's true - all porn scenes are pretty much the same, and seem to follow a standard sript that says blowjob - pussylicking - fucking - facial, and prescribes doggy style, missionary sans-contact and cowgirl as standard positions. Now the positions are okay - missionary is my favorite too - but the porn script writers (they exist?) should have the courage to go all the way, if they show elaborate-bodied actors, then they should show elaborate positions too. Have it all, or have none.

Good observation by the way, Mr. President - That's something that came to my mind, but never loud enough so that I'd notice it - the sets indeed look very generic. My own bedroom at least doesn't look as orderly as a porn productions... you know the old question: Underwear looks best (A) - if it's plain cottons, (B) - frilly, whorish, red, © - when it's draped over a lampshade. Never seen such frantic undressing action in a porn movie.

Why don't we found a porn production on ourself? We have enough sexy ladies (no porn stars, but REALLY sexies), hung studs and ideas to do that... and regarding the market group we target, if we loose the usual porn watchers, and make porn acceptable to you average, everyday folks, economic success should be granted.

Bruce

 

[Dr. Dilznick]

Originally posted by jonb
He likes fat chicks.

It's called "thick."

 

[lapdog2001]

Originally posted by 11incher@Sep 24 2005, 07:04 PM
Why is every woman in porno called a "Porn Star" Not everyone is a star.

[post=346240]Quoted post[/post]​

For the same reason every model these days is called a "SuperModel"?

Cheryl Tiegs, Cindy Crawford, Tyra Banks, Hiedi Klum were all supermodels, because they were well known outside the fashion industry. I can't think of any current high fashion models that I would consider supermodels, yet. OK, just thought of Gisele (Leonardo's girlfriend) but all of today's models are called supermodels even if we don't know their names!

LapDog

 

[pippi]

some of the gonzo porn isnt aesthetically pleasing, but its at least on some level believable, realistic. you really have the feeling the are meeting the first time and dont know about it each other. the amount of passion one can feel varies a lot and how can you be sure that its not faked?

i think that porn needs more emotions (yes faked ones are good, as long as i can believe them). sex scenes in normal movies need to get more realistic, more animalistic. often sex scenes in non porn movies are looking really fake.
my ideal porn film would be a mixture of emotions i can feel, realistic action and aesthetically pleasing pictures.

 

[B_Hickboy]

Originally posted by madame_zora+Sep 24 2005, 11:15 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(madame_zora &#064; Sep 24 2005, 11:15 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-jonb@Sep 25 2005, 01:17 AM
He likes fat chicks.

[post=346267]Quoted post[/post]​

Hey, I resemble that remark&#33;

[post=346291]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]


:loveya: About that titfuck...

 

[Mawg]

Porn hasn&#39;t always been so formulaic. He&#39;s a plot summary from the 1974 movie, "Flesh Gordon" (available on DVD, btw):

Emperor Wang (the Perverted) is leader of the planet Porno and sends his mighty "Sex Ray" towards Earth, turning everyone into sex-mad fiends. Only one man can save the Earth, football player Flesh Gordon. Along with his girlfriend Dale Ardent and Professor Flexi-Jerkoff, they set off towards the source of the Sex Ray, unaware of the perils that face them&#33;

(review from this page)

I seem to recall an encounter with the dreaded "Penisaurous" monsters somewhere in there. The whole thing was a hoot.

 

[BruceSter]

Originally posted by Mawg@Sep 28 2005, 02:10 PM
Porn hasn&#39;t always been so formulaic. He&#39;s a plot summary from the 1974 movie, "Flesh Gordon" (available on DVD, btw):

Emperor Wang (the Perverted) is leader of the planet Porno and sends his mighty "Sex Ray" towards Earth, turning everyone into sex-mad fiends. Only one man can save the Earth, football player Flesh Gordon. Along with his girlfriend Dale Ardent and Professor Flexi-Jerkoff, they set off towards the source of the Sex Ray, unaware of the perils that face them&#33;

(review from this page)

I seem to recall an encounter with the dreaded "Penisaurous" monsters somewhere in there. The whole thing was a hoot.

[post=347272]Quoted post[/post]​

Ummmm... maybe that isn&#39;t formulatic, but, come on - it&#39;s silly as hell.

Bruce

 

[jonb]

There are a lot of porns which are just parodies of old movies: Flesh Gordon&#39;s the most famous, but more recently there&#39;s been Lord of the G-strings and the Bare Wench Project.

 

[madame_zora]

The titles alone are probably better than the movies, those are funny&#33;

 

[MsLulu]

It&#39;s fun sometimes. I&#39;d honestly just rather see a bunch of sex scenes strung together. I usually fast forward through the "storyline."

 

[Lordpendragon]

Originally posted by MsLulu@Oct 2 2005, 09:23 AM
It&#39;s fun sometimes. I&#39;d honestly just rather see a bunch of sex scenes strung together. I usually fast forward through the "storyline."

[post=348147]Quoted post[/post]​

Does that take long these days?

 

[BruceSter]

Originally posted by MsLulu@Oct 2 2005, 02:23 AM
It&#39;s fun sometimes. I&#39;d honestly just rather see a bunch of sex scenes strung together. I usually fast forward through the "storyline."

[post=348147]Quoted post[/post]​

One of the few porn flicks I&#39;ve seen is what I guess they call a "feature production", meaning there&#39;s no actual storyline, just a series of fucks revolving around one theme. That&#39;s okay, at least they don&#39;t pretend to be actors, but still, the style annoys me.

Bruce

 

[thirteenbyseven]

Yeah I have to agree with BruceSter. Since my last post on this thread I&#39;ve strived in vain to locate a decent porn flick with a plot to recommend. The closest I came was an old VHS tape probably made shortly after the death of John C. Holmes. It was a pseudo-documentary on his life, skipping the drugs and Laurel Canyon scandal and concentrating mostly on the porn flicks, attempting to show him in the best light possible after his death from AIDS. Largely made up of footage from his Johnny Wadd movies, the film is narrated by some guy who&#39;s baritone voice emanates from a region around his lower diaphragm.

"But whatever role he assumed, he was always on the side of law and good (pronounced gewd.")

On the screen, Holmes is pummeling a couple of bad guys with faux-punches that land a couple of feet off target. A breathless ex-porn actress comes on and extolls Holmes&#39; love-making skills, praising him for being relentless but with a delicate touch (on-screen John C. is sinking his whopper into the vaginal region of a woman resembling a Sasquatch.) Hey, it was the furry &#39;70&#39;s and 80&#39;s. The film concludes with the golden throated announcer telling the viewer that there will never be another John C. Holmes.