Heil Hillary!!!

[jeffm88]

Obama is going to hit that

 

[BIGBULL29]

Hillary vs. Obama = the bitch vs the black man

Hillary vs. black woman = the white bitch vs. the black bitch

Hillary vs. white man = the bitch vs white man




Misogyny is alive and well across the US. I'm trying to remove the word "bitch" from my vocabulary. I'm not a woman-hater.

 

[faceking]

Clearly, race trumps gender:

Hillary vs. Obama = the bitch vs the black man

Hillary vs. black woman = the white bitch vs. the black bitch

Hillary vs. white man = the bitch vs white man




Misogyny is alive and well across the US. I'm trying to remove the word "bitch" from my vocabulary. I'm not a woman-hater.

I think the bulk of us are past that.. and those that aren't... they are in states that don't matter... either hyper-blue or hyper-red. I tend to think the bulk of Americans are adults... granted they know very little about actual fact and detail, but are actually civil in their preference. No?

 

[dreamer20]

Do you think Imus got fired because he called the Rugby basketball team hos? or for the "nappy-headed" adjective that prefaced it?

IMO it was the whores part that was offensive. And I don't think he should have been fired.

 

[deleted213967]

Shame this election is being hallmarked as a black or woman... when Bush appointed both to one of the most important positions in the country... yet the mainstream media (and markedly the bulk, if not all of this board) was silent. Hypocrisy in it's finest hour.

I am not sure I agree the media were silent. I recall reading lengthy articles and interviews in the NYT alone about Condi.

Condoleezza Rice doesn't like to play the race card herself and is clearly annoyed when complimented on her "exceptional" achievements as an African American (her family has been college-educated for several generations).

Today, her race and gender do not count. Her main attribute is being associated with that "W" person and that does not go over well with 70% of the population.

 

[BIGBULL29]

I think the bulk of us are past that.. and those that aren't... they are in states that don't matter... either hyper-blue or hyper-red. I tend to think the bulk of Americans are adults... granted they know very little about actual fact and detail, but are actually civil in their preference. No?

For the other poster: Condi Rice is not the president. We never had a woman president before. The office has been all-male since the very beginning, which is incredibly embarrassing for a country that prides itself in civility.

I think that many American men are against Hillary simply because of her gender. Certainly, it's not the vast majority, but it's strong enough that it could keep her from being elected.

Why do you need a dick to run the country? :biggrin1:

 

[playainda336]

I just don't like the fact that people are using the "You don't like Hillary because she's a female" guilt trip to try to make people feel like they need to vote for her.

I honestly don't think that MOST of the people not voting for Hillary are only NOT going to vote for her because she's female. That's absurd. For most, she's just simply not the best choice.

 

[mindseye]

People bash Bush all the time, and have made a sport of comparing him to Hitler.

Indeed.. including ppl making a comment here, and seeing their brethren do the same here on LPSG. The hypocrisy is so softball-fluffy-pitch to point out, it's laughable at times.

Fact-check!

It's easy to pretend that people on LPSG are "making a sport" of comparing Bush to Hitler. But it's an untrue fantasy on the part of Italian1 and faceking.

There are exactly eight Google hits on all of LPSG (not counting this one) in which Bush and Hitler are mentioned together. Here they are:

1. On March 26, former member big dirigible used the phrase to taunt liberals: "Go ahead, say it - "Bush = Hitler". Appreciate its cathartic, if not actual, value." No one actually took him up on the offer.
2. Later in the same thread, on April 4, JQBlonde called Bush/Hitler comparisons "TRIPE".
3. On May 26, Rikter8 made the only explicit comparison of Bush to Hitler on LPSG. He stated that both men "preyed on human emotion to rally people up."
4. On May 31, RideRocket responded to Rikter8's comparison, telling him to "lighten up".
5. On September 20, NineInchCock160IQ stated that people who call Bush Hitler "seem like complete boobs".
6. ...In fact, he explicitly refuted the comparison in another post in that thread by saying that "...I don't believe Bush has the power, whereas Hitler was the fuhrer, Bush is only a puppet."
7. Way back in May 2005, LongTimeComing stated that "anyone" who drew blanket comparisons to Hitler "is an idiot regardless of right or left."
8. Finally, also in May 2005, quoting then-Senator Rick Santorum, who compared the Democratic leadership in Congress to Hitler.

So there you have it. One post in which a member drew a comparison between Bush and Hitler, and another post in which a member of the Senate compared Democrats to Hitler. And now, a post comparing Hillary Clinton to Hitler. By my count, we owe you one.

Now, who's making a sport of this?

 

[faceking]

I think that many American men are against Hillary simply because of her gender. Certainly, it's not the vast majority, but it's strong enough that it could keep her from being elected.

Why do you need a dick to run the country? :biggrin1:

I think you are actually wrong... I think American men are against Hillary because it's Hillary. She's a fake, has little experience, wrong on many issues, etc... Personally, if you say "you have to have a female president"... give me Condy, DiFi, late Ann Richards, etc...".

I think it's folly to assume if you are against Obama, you are a racist, if you are against Hillary you are a male chauvinist.

 

[faceking]

Fact-check!

It's easy to pretend that people on LPSG are "making a sport" of comparing Bush to Hitler. But it's an untrue fantasy on the part of Italian1 and faceking.

There are exactly eight Google hits on all of LPSG (not counting this one) in which Bush and Hitler are mentioned together. Here they are:

1. On March 26, former member big dirigible used the phrase to taunt liberals: "Go ahead, say it - "Bush = Hitler". Appreciate its cathartic, if not actual, value." No one actually took him up on the offer.
2. Later in the same thread, on April 4, JQBlonde called Bush/Hitler comparisons "TRIPE".
3. On May 26, Rikter8 made the only explicit comparison of Bush to Hitler on LPSG. He stated that both men "preyed on human emotion to rally people up."
4. On May 31, RideRocket responded to Rikter8's comparison, telling him to "lighten up".
5. On September 20, NineInchCock160IQ stated that people who call Bush Hitler "seem like complete boobs".
6. ...In fact, he explicitly refuted the comparison in another post in that thread by saying that "...I don't believe Bush has the power, whereas Hitler was the fuhrer, Bush is only a puppet."
7. Way back in May 2005, LongTimeComing stated that "anyone" who drew blanket comparisons to Hitler "is an idiot regardless of right or left."
8. Finally, also in May 2005, quoting then-Senator Rick Santorum, who compared the Democratic leadership in Congress to Hitler.

So there you have it. One post in which a member drew a comparison between Bush and Hitler, and another post in which a member of the Senate compared Democrats to Hitler. And now, a post comparing Hillary Clinton to Hitler. By my count, we owe you one.

Now, who's making a sport of this?

Huh?????????? LPSG and the US Senate... nice reach babydoll.

Untrue fantasy... wow... for a co-moderator, you are getting a little non-biased it seems, as well as you incorrect Mister Fact Checker...

A> wasn't calling out the senate..

B> you needs to re-does ya searching.... here's a post you've conveniently missed only... um one day ago... where Alex 8.5 remarked "Yes I have a problem with this. I consider Bush in the same league as Hitler."
In case your search functionality missed it, let me point you: http://www.lpsg.org/78052-g-w-bush-voted-one-8.html#post1297581

so make that two posts, and counting...

C> here's another one... you also missed. pavement calling Ann Coulter , well here you go: "Mrs. Hilter should be put out to pasture already."
Again, since your search functionality seems to oddly be different than mine, let me point it to ya: http://www.lpsg.org/58638-does-anyone-here-not-hate-5.html#post968642


Not going to bother looking for more, but guessing there are a handful. Shame to see this from a co-mod.

Scoreboard.

 

[playainda336]

I think it's folly to assume if you are against Obama, you are a racist, if you are against Hillary you are a male chauvinist.

Amen!

 

[mindseye]

B> you needs to re-does ya searching.... here's a post you've conveniently missed only... um one day ago... where Alex 8.5 remarked "Yes I have a problem with this. I consider Bush in the same league as Hitler."
In case your search functionality missed it, let me point you: http://www.lpsg.org/78052-g-w-bush-voted-one-8.html#post1297581

I'll concede this one. The post is too recent for Google to have indexed it, but it's valid. That's the "one we owe you."

C> here's another one... you also missed. pavement calling Ann Coulter , well here you go: "Mrs. Hilter should be put out to pasture already."

If you're going to disallow placing Senate leaders in the same league with Bush, then it's hypocritical of you to cite a comparison involving Ann Coulter. She didn't appear in my search, because I searched specifically for the words "Bush" and "Hitler" on the same page, stated that I did so, and linked to the results.

In any case, you've failed to show these comparisons are frequent enough to warrant being called a "sport".

 

[D_Kaye Throttlebottom]

No I don't see the merit in attacking the position about Not putting Obama in that jpeg and that it's a racial issue and spinning that is the racial issue.

Hilter people... Hilter - that's a racial issue and they are comparing Hillary to Hitler. I don't see the outrage about race with Hitler and Hillary.

It's like 1001 ways to take offense at something where none is intended with this board.

Frankly it's a little severe.

 

[mindseye]

Hilter people... Hilter - that's a racial issue and they are comparing Hillary to Hitler. I don't see the outrage about race with Hitler and Hillary.

Of course the comparison is racist; it's equating the life of one Vince Foster to those of six million Jewish people.

 

[B_NineInchCock_160IQ]

I think the third picture was doctored

 

[Ethyl]

Shame this election is being hallmarked as a black or woman... when Bush appointed both to one of the most important positions in the country... yet the mainstream media (and markedly the bulk, if not all of this board) was silent. Hypocrisy in it's finest hour.

No, I noticed but you just weren't paying attention. See this.

Does being the first black Secretary of State matter when your leaders fire you?

Nah, of course not.

 

[BIGBULL29]

I think you are actually wrong... I think American men are against Hillary because it's Hillary. She's a fake, has little experience, wrong on many issues, etc... Personally, if you say "you have to have a female president"... give me Condy, DiFi, late Ann Richards, etc...".

I think it's folly to assume if you are against Obama, you are a racist, if you are against Hillary you are a male chauvinist.

Yeah, you are right, it's folly to assume that most black people are voting for Obama (only .002% as of today). This presidential race is not about race for anyone. Even are dear teacher and mentor, Oprah, based her public endorsement strictly on Obama's political ideas.
Before, she just didn't want to support any political candidate publicly. But this time it's different because it's Obama...yeah Obama...the candidate who is____like her.

All, by the way, the majority of white democratic men love Hillary, but the vast majority of white democratic women hate her. Did you know that? I think that's really ironic. White women hate her? Yep, that's I hear these days.

You're right, though: Gender, like race, is playing virtually no role.

 

[B_NineInchCock_160IQ]

I think you are actually wrong... I think American men are against Hillary because it's Hillary. She's a fake, has little experience, wrong on many issues, etc... Personally, if you say "you have to have a female president"... give me Condy, DiFi, late Ann Richards, etc...".

I think it's folly to assume if you are against Obama, you are a racist, if you are against Hillary you are a male chauvinist.

You'd vote for a deceased head of state?

I guess if it works for North Korea, what the hell...

 

[mattbuddy]

Haha that first picture is really funny! Thanks for sharing that! Made me laugh.

 

[faceking]

Yeah, you are right, it's folly to assume that most black people are voting for Obama (only .002% as of today). This presidential race is not about race for anyone. Even are dear teacher and mentor, Oprah, based her public endorsement strictly on Obama's political ideas. Before, she just didn't want to support anybody publicly. It's very unlikely that race or gender will have any bearing on the who's elected. Yeah, gotcha!

All, by the way, the majority of white democratic men love Hillary, but a lot of white democratic women hate her. You're right: gender is playing no role.

I'm not denying it occurs, and born/raised San Franciscan you just couldn't care less, and I understand the rest of the country isn't SF. But I think many ppl look past Obama's color, and ppl don't like Hillary of because who she is. I don't see much/any hatred for Obama, speaking... it's more of a Pro-Hillary vs. an Anti-Obama on Clinton supporters. On the other hand, ppl I talk to, just don't trust/like her... sneaky wanna-be career, backstabbing politician.

I'm writing in my candidate this time around...