Justin Bieber

[D_Harry_Scholnga]

Where did you see wet underwear pics that even suggested a big cock?

Google it.

 

[rbkwp]

Aussie innovation Mumty
keep them infernal emoticon creatures corralled in the signature box, haha love it

soldier on matey, plenty more foibles we can discover...............

as fr the JB lovers, best they can hope for is a neekid role in equus as well, at age 45 maybe... ha
uuhhm beastiality with a mid aged, where would that one sit...lpsg

 

[patronpk]

Dear Sweet Boy..becoming a man now...your music isn't that bad - it's rather good considering the age group writing it - but you're a doll - a real rim queen's dream - if the definition doesn't ring a bell, try it sometime...by someone that's experienced at it & LOVES you ! Happy Birthday,:smile::tongue: too!

 

[Mr. Snakey]

Frankly, i don't understand why members insist on pushing the envelope regarding the rules witch clearly state no images or inappropriate content involving minors. The legal age being 18. He just turned 18. The moderators have bent over backwards to explain the rules to us. Anyone with common sense would know that 99% of the pics available are of him being a minor. Then we get into a sexual discussion? I can only come to one conclusion. I find it very disturbing. If anyone has interests in this type of activity or discussion, please take it elsewhere. We also continue to post news stories involving minors. That needs to stop too. This is an adult website. This is not the place to discuss anything to do with minors or children.

 

[722764]

Those pictures are only a few months ago and I know he is still a minor but they are hardly pics of him when he was 12.

 

[Novaboy]

Those pictures are only a few months ago and I know he is still a minor but they are hardly pics of him when he was 12.

Under 18 is under 18.

 

[Gecko4lif]

Alot of creepy mother fuckers is this thread.

 

[Novaboy]

Alot of creepy mother fuckers is this thread.

Agreed. Let the kid grow up.

 

[roccoandglenn]

fuck that bitch he's 18 now so get over yourself you bitch...all peeps have to do is post his new pics with that lezbo hair and all will be fine!!

 

[SirConcis]

If you are interested in some dude that looks 13, no matter what his real age is, I still consider it peodophelia even if the law doesn't.

There are probably guys who are 16 who look more like real men than justin bieber who is technically and adult male.

My only interest in this kid is whether he is cut or not. He was born after Ontario started to drop circ rates. So he may be uncut.

 

[Gaydane]

Those pictures are only a few months ago and I know he is still a minor but they are hardly pics of him when he was 12.

I agree. Some people on this site are very hysterical. Probably because there are so many americans on this site. And we know that in the USA people are sooooo hysterical about teenagers sexuality

I think it´s stupid that people almost think it´s pedophilia to discuss about a 18 yo teenboy. Only in America people are so hysterical, and well: maybe also in Great Britain LOL

I also think it´s strange that you cannot even refer to non nude pictures of a 16-17 yo. Please, be serious! There is nothing pornographic about such images. People are far to hysterical. And I have discussed this even with the mods of this site. They know my opinion, and they know that I find the rules on this site a little exaggerated, even that I do understand why they have those rules (because they don´t want to risk anything, and that´s understandable. But my points is still, that there is NOTHING illegal about refering to a non nude pic of Justin Bieber as a 16 or 17 old where he is just singing on a stage...the site doesn´t risk ANYTHING by allowing such pics to be posted. But that ´s just my opinion...).

 

[Gaydane]

If you are interested in some dude that looks 13, no matter what his real age is, I still consider it peodophelia even if the law doesn't.

There are probably guys who are 16 who look more like real men than justin bieber who is technically and adult male.

My only interest in this kid is whether he is cut or not. He was born after Ontario started to drop circ rates. So he may be uncut.

Bieber doesn´t look 13, but maybe 16. But he is sexually mature and has a girlfriend. What difference does it make if he looks young or old? He is still 18. Some guys are just more feminine and boyish than other guys.

I have even seen 25 year olds asian guys who look like 16. But having sex with such a guy is not pedophilia. And sorry that I say this, but I have to say it: I can´t take you seriously if you think such relations are pedophilia. That´s ridiculous.

People, especially in the USA (one of the most fundamentalist and less freedom loving countries on the world, and yes, that´s my opinion!) are being far to hysterical about teenagers sexuality. In my world pedophilia concerns kids who are not into puberty yet, so I don´t even consider a relation to a 15-16 yo as pedophilia. But in the USA most people think it´s child molestation to be with a 17 yo. Ridiculous. No wonder that so many outside the USA hate the USA. Because americans are generally not very tolerant - but mostly they are fundamentalists and ignorant. I myself will never visit the USA, it´s an intolerant and not very free country with a ridiculous mentality: people are walking around in the streets with guns and weapons, which most americans strangely enough find okay. But if you talk about a 17 yo you are a pedophile and should go 10 years to prison. I hate that mentality. It´s just so stupid, but typically american. They love violence and love guns and weapons, but teenagers sexuality is such a taboo. In the USA most people would probably prefer his 16 yo son to walk around with a gun in his pocket rather than having sex. Very very strange mentality that I will probably never understand

 

[Gaydane]

Under 18 is under 18.

But no porn is no porn...if an image is non nude and not pornographic it´s still legal whatever the guy is 16 or 75.

Of course I know the rules of this site. But I am just saying that even that such photos are not welcome here, there is still nothing illegal about them

 

[luvinlife83]

All I have to say is, I don't remember all this controversy when Taylor Lautner turned 18. People were coming out of the wood work about how hot he is (which is true), but since it's Justin Bieber is 18 but looks young, there is an issue.

 

[rbkwp]

All I have to say is, I don't remember all this controversy when Taylor Lautner turned 18.


or Daniel Radcliffe for that matter
then again maybe he did, i shudder the thought of a thread on him, being revived...perhaps he is too old now, lack of interest?
then again again,it would probably provide insight into fellow members who prefer the likes of similar aged persons.

 

[Novaboy]

The board is just being careful about USA laws. Yes, they are being extra careful but wouldn't you if you were the owner or had some control over this board? Child porn (which technically is anyone under 18, though I get what people are saying about porn and non porn aspects of these posts) laws are not something that anyone wants to be seen to break in anyway shape or form. They are just being cautious. Though I agree that just commenting that a cute young guy is a cute young guy and will one day be a hunk is a bit over cautious but it's their call.

 

[luvinlife83]

The board is just being careful about USA laws. Yes, they are being extra careful but wouldn't you if you were the owner or had some control over this board? Child porn (which technically is anyone under 18, though I get what people are saying about porn and non porn aspects of these posts) laws are not something that anyone wants to be seen to break in anyway shape or form. They are just being cautious. Though I agree that just commenting that a cute young guy is a cute young guy and will one day be a hunk is a bit over cautious but it's their call.

I too understand the owner being cautious. However, my post to those who are saying this is creepy, he's just turned 18, and how those of us who are commenting that he is cute are border pedo's. it's ridiculous.

 

[Novaboy]

I too understand the owner being cautious. However, my post to those who are saying this is creepy, he's just turned 18, and how those of us who are commenting that he is cute are border pedo's. it's ridiculous.

I think it's because he looks young. If he was one of those teens that matured early with a beard at 16 and deep voice I think people would respond differently. Can't be easy growing up in the spotlight. No one was accused of being a ped over Zac, Joe Jonas, Or Daniel Radcliffe because they look more "manly"

But there are certainly many advantages of the life he's leading!

 

[MickeyLee]

I agree. Some people on this site are very hysterical. Probably because there are so many americans on this site. And we know that in the USA people are sooooo hysterical about teenagers sexuality

I think it´s stupid that people almost think it´s pedophilia to discuss about a 18 yo teenboy. Only in America people are so hysterical, and well: maybe also in Great Britain LOL

I also think it´s strange that you cannot even refer to non nude pictures of a 16-17 yo. Please, be serious! There is nothing pornographic about such images. People are far to hysterical. And I have discussed this even with the mods of this site. They know my opinion, and they know that I find the rules on this site a little exaggerated, even that I do understand why they have those rules (because they don´t want to risk anything, and that´s understandable. But my points is still, that there is NOTHING illegal about refering to a non nude pic of Justin Bieber as a 16 or 17 old where he is just singing on a stage...the site doesn´t risk ANYTHING by allowing such pics to be posted. But that ´s just my opinion...).

is not teenage sexuality that twists me knickers.. is exploitation of teenage sexuality.

if ya gonna get ya own hysteria dander up ya can at least be accurate with ya accusations.

 

[D_Toren_Adopants]

I actually agree with much of what you say, but wanted to comment on the bolded section.

While it may technically not be illegal, it is against the rules here. To some that may seem extreme, but Rob has made that rule to ensure that we as members, and this site as a whole are all protected from even the slightest indication of minors being featured on this site.

All it would take would be for one over zealous do gooder to happen to see a pic of a minor on a site primarily about penises and sexual situations, and they could cause a lot of problems, not too mention getting the law involved.

Rob owns this site, and has the right and the responsability of keeping himself, and us safe.

Thanks Rob