stud_hunter
Experimental Member
OmahaBeef said:I love your posts StudHunter...you always kick the real deal...
...OB
Oh and thanks doll :wink: .
OmahaBeef said:I love your posts StudHunter...you always kick the real deal...
...OB
The money AND a big cock...they don't necessarily have to come from the same source...:tongue: OK--that was bitter---and from an old source. I'll shut up now...over8andkinky said:wait, so women are just in it for money right?
davidjh7 said:The money AND a big cock...they don't necessarily have to come from the same source...:tongue: OK--that was bitter---and from an old source. I'll shut up now...
stud_hunter said:Everyone has something they're after. Some guys like big boobs or a tight ass. Some girls like broad shoulders, a nice smile or a big dick. And nobody doesn't like money, although hopefully most people wouldn't date someone mainly for that. But the rest of the stuff, it's all just preferences.
davidjh7 said:Very true. And, sex, and sexuality don't really come into play here, either--there are good and bad people of all backgrounds, and users and givers...I guess the thing to acheive is to try and sort out who is who...
stud_hunter said:I think the bottom line is there are 2 kinds of relationships, mutual ones and parasitic ones. Mutual relationships come in all forms and styles but it means both people know the stakes and rules and get something out of it. Parasitic relationships usually involve either force, or, more often, dishonesty. I try, pretty successfully I think, to avoid that.
Pumblechook said:Ah, studhunter, you impress me tonight. That is a very good summary of relational interaction.
stud_hunter said:Well thanks. Although I cannot take credit. The mutual/parasitic idea came from a daytime talk show I saw probably 10 years ago and stuck in my mind .
4herplsr said:DC How did your world get so black and white?
BronxBombshell said:You see what he said as ignoring shades of gray? Perhaps it does. But I must agree with him. A person of character honors their word. When you commit to someone, you do not say, "I am commited to you until it becomes inconvenient, or until I want to have sex with other people. I will keep my promises, but express and implied, so long as you fulfil my needs, my desires, cater to my whims, and so long as I never find a bigger penis/hotter body/tighter pussy. I will be yours alone, if and only if nothing goes wrong between us. I will never, ever stray when I'm happy, but when I'm unhappy, I'll go somewhere else, instead of trying to work things out with you."
You either:
or worse than any of those-
- do not understand integrity
- do not understand commitment
- do not believe that monogamyis a valid promise to make
Or maybe I don't understand what point you're trying to make.
- do not have any integrity
Pumblechook said:wow, Bronxy, your posts are too good. Now I know why no-one reads mine either. Darn it, I really just wanted to randomly reply to your post, but now I've failed and an just "rambling man" again.
BronxBombshell said:I read you posts! *huggle* I would usually insert: "You're not rambling!" butoddly, this time, Ithink you might be. I don't really understand this post. Then again, it's waaaaay past time for bed.
Pumblechook said:Assuming you're in NY, ... and I'm in MI... we are totally past bedtime. I'm glad you read my posts. "huggle" I've never heard. I promise to confuse the boards again... I promise...
Notice: Sometimes my posts are ununderstandable... ... not sure if the last one qualifies,.. but in general...
BronxBombshell said:A huggle is similar to a long hug. I give out a lot of those. I like to hug people. A huggle is a hug so thorough, it's almost like cuddling.