dong20
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2006
- Posts
- 6,058
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 28
- Points
- 183
- Location
- The grey country
- Sexuality
- No Response
Ah, but look more carefully at what I said, though. The first four infractions in the ToS are not all age-related, although they are account-related:
Someone banned for violating Section 2a would not necessarily be an underage user.
- Use of an account by any person under 18 years of age.
- Falsification of one's date of birth.
- Use of more than one account by the same person.
- Use by more than one person of the same account.
I did, and the items 1 and 2 are entirely age related, the first especially and likely goes hand in hand with 1...!! But the reason I commented was because I'm unconvinced that wrapping items 3 and 4 up along with 1 and 2 would fly. If it does then it's moot, if not then it may work.
Personally I'd go go with items 1,2 and 4. Item 3 is deserving of explcit explanation IMHO as is suggests a more suspect motive than underage curiosity. I'm sure the groupings could be shuffled better if necessary.