Thank you for the thoughtful response. I agree that I left out the segment that includes men who are involved in a commited relationship. I did that intentionally believing that men who had intimate and loving relationships with another man would not fall into any of these categories. I should have clarified my intention was to target the segment of men who meet for NSA sexual encounters. I will try to edit the post to make that more clear. Please accept my apology. I meant no disrespect to men involved in LT relationships.
No need to apologize. I was never offended. Just ever so slightly frustrated that I couldn't find an option that felt like it fit.
I don't think the way this is worded only excludes men in committed relationships, but more broadly any man who wouldn't have sex unless there were solid chemistry between himself and his man of erotic interest. That's what is suggested to me by the third option: "...
if the chemistry is right I would return the favor." I.e. the man fitting option #3 would allow another man to suck him off under fairly broad conditions, but would only reciprocate if there were good chemistry.
If a man would generally only have any kind of sexual encounter given good chemistry, this description would not fit. Being in a relationship or not is beside the point. It feels like these options are geared towards a mentality of sex being just about getting off. If sex is seen as something that is supposed to be caring, mutual, and relational, the options just don't make much sense.
As I hinted at in my first post, I think these options could have been worded more simply to be amenable to a broader range of mentalities. For example, option #4 could have been phrased as: "I prefer giving head, but am content with receiving it too. Which would avoid the distancing and apathetic connotation of "
let another man suck me off" and the objectifying undertones of "cocksucker" and "drain". Again, that's not to say that I take offense at your choosing this type of language, it just seems unnecessarily narrow.