The truth about a tiny dick

[693987]

This Just In: a lot of men on this site photo shop their dick pics.

While you are obviously very unhappy about the size of your dick. What if anything do you intend to do about it?

You can't grow a new one. No offense but I don't understand why something that functions as it was meant to: gets hard, shoots cum out of it, and you can pee with it, is causing you so much grief?

What is so wrong with your dick? I'm sure there are plenty of men and women that would enjoy your dick given the opportunity.

I don't have an 8 or 9' dick, wish I did. But I don't. Therefore I accept that my DNA is what dictates my dick size. It's something that none of us men have a say in. We' have the dick we've got.

I chose to become a good lover and do whatever it takes to satisfy my partners with the dick that fate dealt me.

Do chic's want a bigger dick than I have to give them? Maybe, but that's not what I'm fixated on. All I'm fixated on is tapping that pussy and giving her the best fuck I have in me. Showing her that I may not have the biggest dick around but it might be the best love making, fuck session she's had in a while.

You're not going to get through to him. So many people have tried. He would rather bitch, moan, and blame something he can't change for his problems than actually work his issues and personality.

I wouldn't touch someone with that many issues with someone else's genitals. Not when they would constantly accuse me of lying and be completely caught up in their martyr complex. Not for a fuck buddy and not for a romantic relationship. I haven't the time, energy, or desire. Annnd shockingly enough, it has nothing to do with what someone has or doesn't have between their legs.

 

[AlteredEgo]

This Just In: a lot of men on this site photo shop their dick pics.

And some of the women are men.

 

[Gj816]

And some of the women are men.

What you said. Roflmao

 

[Gj816]

You're not going to get through to him. So many people have tried. He would rather bitch, moan, and blame something he can't change for his problems than actually work his issues and personality.

I wouldn't touch someone with that many issues with someone else's genitals. Not when they would constantly accuse me of lying and be completely caught up in their martyr complex. Not for a fuck buddy and not for a romantic relationship. I haven't the time, energy, or desire. Annnd shockingly enough, it has nothing to do with what someone has or doesn't have between their legs.

I agree.

 

[916416]

And some of the women are men.

 

[deleted1138933]

You're not going to get through to him. So many people have tried. He would rather bitch, moan, and blame something he can't change for his problems than actually work his issues and personality.

I wouldn't touch someone with that many issues with someone else's genitals. Not when they would constantly accuse me of lying and be completely caught up in their martyr complex. Not for a fuck buddy and not for a romantic relationship. I haven't the time, energy, or desire. Annnd shockingly enough, it has nothing to do with what someone has or doesn't have between their legs.

When and where have I called you a liar? I have never mentioned nor responded to you.

 

[deleted1138933]

You're not going to get through to him. So many people have tried. He would rather bitch, moan, and blame something he can't change for his problems than actually work his issues and personality.

I wouldn't touch someone with that many issues with someone else's genitals. Not when they would constantly accuse me of lying and be completely caught up in their martyr complex. Not for a fuck buddy and not for a romantic relationship. I haven't the time, energy, or desire. Annnd shockingly enough, it has nothing to do with what someone has or doesn't have between their legs.

And can you specify which issues and personality? You never met me. You do not know what I am like, and believe me there is nothing wring with my personality.

 

[693987]

When and where have I called you a liar? I have never mentioned nor responded to you.

You dismiss everything I have ever said about size not being the be all end all. You dismiss everything I've said about good sex with a variety of men who had a variety of different penis sizes. You dismiss and as good as call pretty much every single woman who has interacted with you on the entire board that I have ever stumbled across/seen a liar when we say things contrary to your martyr complex. That includes @AlteredEgo @Tight_N_Juicy and others. You may "never mentioned nor responded to you" in this specific thread, but you have a wonderfully selective memory if you think that applies to your entire time of posting on this site.

As for your personality? You pretty much scream it all over the board. Maybe you're a complete 180 offline from the personality you show online, but I highly doubt it.

Edited to add: You twist words constantly and don't believe what I say, so, yes, you pretty much call me a liar. And just in case your memory fails you, here's just a sample of some of our prior conversation. This is all pretty public, as it's on your wall, so I have zero issues with posting it here to remind you.

 

[1345864]

You dismiss everything I have ever said about size not being the be all end all. You dismiss everything I've said about good sex with a variety of men who had a variety of different penis sizes. You dismiss and as good as call pretty much every single woman who has interacted with you on the entire board that I have ever stumbled across/seen a liar when we say things contrary to your martyr complex. That includes @AlteredEgo @Tight_N_Juicy and others. You may "never mentioned nor responded to you" in this specific thread, but you have a wonderfully selective memory if you think that applies to your entire time of posting on this site.

As for your personality? You pretty much scream it all over the board. Maybe you're a complete 180 offline from the personality you show online, but I highly doubt it.

Edited to add: You twist words constantly and don't believe what I say, so, yes, you pretty much call me a liar. And just in case your memory fails you, here's just a sample of some of our prior conversation. This is all pretty public, as it's on your wall, so I have zero issues with posting it here to remind you.

WOW.

So women aren't judged based on their looks and attributes? Must be why there's a multi-million dollar industry based on cosmetics, liposuction, plastic surgery, boob jobs, butt jobs, V-tightening and botox.

Nah....because women clearly do all that just for the fun of it. Never because they get shamed, berated/teased for their looks, told they're inadequate, or rejected. Not at all.

I'm facepalming for you, Enid. There's no getting through to this guy.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

Ive had sex with women. Never been in relationship

Again, you are confusing statistical sizes (average, below average, above average) with real sizes (large, medium, small). Average has nothing to do with real sizes

All average means is where majority of a range fall divided by the total number of the sample.

If for some reason 90% of men with 7”+ cocks would be eliminated (war, disease, or whatever) and sample measurements would be taken thereafter, the “average” size would significantly decrease. Does not mean a 3” dick is suddenly medium or large.

Likewise, if for some reason 90% of men with 6”- dicks would be eliminated (war, disease, or whatever) and sample measurements would be taken thereafter, the “average” size would significantly increase. Does not mean a 7” cock is suddenly medium or small.

Please don't make yourself look even more foolish by attempting to explain yet another topic of which you're ignorant.

There is no "statistical vs real". If you're attempting to discredit all statistics, you'd better have an actual explanation for why. You can certainly claim that sample sizes aren't large enough to accurately extrapolate results. But then you must also concede that your own "real life experiences" (which are merely anecdote) are also a pitifully small sample group.

I know average, median, mean and their relevance and relationships. You clearly do not.

Regarding your hypotheticals, if a portion of a population is removed, then yes, that changes the relative proportions. You seem to think you can compare yourself to bigger guys, then remove the biggest and not have it change the comparison. It doesn't change you, but your position within the total comparison group changes. You can't have it both ways...you can't base your psychological issues on comparisons ("she'll always be thinking about him") and then refuse to accept that changing the basis for your comparisons would also change your relative stance. Perhaps accepting yourself instead of endlessly comparing yourself is the answer. What was I thinking? You don't want solutions, you just want to be miserable.

Until you have relationships, you'll never understand what anyone here is telling you. Your utter lack of experience is an enormous indicator that you need serious long-term psychological counseling.

 

[hammer75]

Please don't make yourself look even more foolish by attempting to explain yet another topic of which you're ignorant.

There is no "statistical vs real". If you're attempting to discredit all statistics, you'd better have an actual explanation for why. You can certainly claim that sample sizes aren't large enough to accurately extrapolate results. But then you must also concede that your own "real life experiences" (which are merely anecdote) are also a pitifully small sample group.

I know average, median, mean and their relevance and relationships. You clearly do not.

Regarding your hypotheticals, if a portion of a population is removed, then yes, that changes the relative proportions. You seem to think you can compare yourself to bigger guys, then remove the biggest and not have it change the comparison. It doesn't change you, but your position within the total comparison group changes. You can't have it both ways...you can't base your psychological issues on comparisons ("she'll always be thinking about him") and then refuse to accept that changing the basis for your comparisons would also change your relative stance. Perhaps accepting yourself instead of endlessly comparing yourself is the answer. What was I thinking? You don't want solutions, you just want to be miserable.

Until you have relationships, you'll never understand what anyone here is telling you. Your utter lack of experience is an enormous indicator that you need serious long-term psychological counseling.

I go back to something I said to a friend in high school who was dating the most physically attractive girl in our class, based on opinion polls anyway. He told us that she was great in the sack but completely awful as a person. I asked him how much time they spent having sex per day and then asked how the other 23.5 hours went. The answer was simple and they lasted a month together. There is so much more to a relationship than sex, yes it’s a big part in some ways but really as you go along it matters less. My wife is much more concerned about my ability to treat her with respect and dignity and my ability to be a good father to our kids than my ability to hit “bottom” or “stretch” her out. My lack of compatibility in the bedroom is an issue in the bedroom but nowhere else for her, for me it’s an issue everywhere even though I’m a little less of a head case than I use to be. If you just want a one dimensional, physical relationship with a relatively obscure people group, size queens, than I suppose you might have difficulty. If you are looking for a long lasting and rewarding relationship sex happens to be almost the least important thing in it. I would subjectively say that my wife has spent way more time on picking out pizza toppings than thoughts of my junk, and we usually get the same thing on our pizza. I don’t want to diminish @HarryPalmas personal experience but until you are in a “real” relationship he will never know the complexity of one.

 

[deleted1138933]

You dismiss everything I have ever said about size not being the be all end all. You dismiss everything I've said about good sex with a variety of men who had a variety of different penis sizes. You dismiss and as good as call pretty much every single woman who has interacted with you on the entire board that I have ever stumbled across/seen a liar when we say things contrary to your martyr complex. That includes @AlteredEgo @Tight_N_Juicy and others. You may "never mentioned nor responded to you" in this specific thread, but you have a wonderfully selective memory if you think that applies to your entire time of posting on this site.

As for your personality? You pretty much scream it all over the board. Maybe you're a complete 180 offline from the personality you show online, but I highly doubt it.

Edited to add: You twist words constantly and don't believe what I say, so, yes, you pretty much call me a liar. And just in case your memory fails you, here's just a sample of some of our prior conversation. This is all pretty public, as it's on your wall, so I have zero issues with posting it here to remind you.

So I never said that penis size is the be all end all in a relationship for women, I have stated that when it comes to sex, given a choice, every woman I have met has at some point stated they prefer medium to larger over small. As to the other conversations, I have stated the same thing, and still have not been disproved.

As to my personality, I can assure you, that you have no clue whatsoever. Believe me, I do not announce my problem to the world. It is not something I am proud of to let people know. So yeah, you cannot know anything of my interactions in real life.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

And can you specify which issues and personality? You never met me. You do not know what I am like, and believe me there is nothing wring with my personality.

Nobody with a well-adjusted personality is 42 and has never had any relationships.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

I don’t want to diminish @HarryPalmas personal experience but until you are in a “real” relationship he will never know the complexity of one.

I want to address this separately from your entire post (which was very inciteful).

It is not diminishing his experience when someone puts it in perspective. He's talked to, and listened to some women. They had comments about penises. He has taken those comments and used them as a justification for spending his entire adult life without a female relationship. That is not what a person with good emotional health does. According to his posts he's 42 years old. He said he recently moved back to his mother's home. No mention that she required his care. None of this adds up to a healthy emotional existence.

He is passing up the experience of parenthood, of building a family and a complete life. Out of fear of rejection over penis size. And he isn't even small...he's damn near at the statistical median, and well within the statistical average group that the majority of men fall within...he's in the fat middle of the bell curve. He's a good looking guy in decent shape. His photos show he can maintain an erection.

In short, except for his head, he could have a good life. But here we are....

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

So I never said that penis size is the be all end all in a relationship for women, I have stated that when it comes to sex, given a choice, every woman I have met has at some point stated they prefer medium to larger over small.

Your actions (never attempting a relationship) belie your words. If penis size wasn't an overriding concern to you, then why have you never had a relationship?

Regarding size, your 5 inch penis is by every definable statistic well within "medium". The majority of men fall within an inch of your size. 5 inches is the median, and 5.2 inches is the average. So every woman you have talked to has stated they prefer YOU over small. And that's without even taking into account that women engage in locker room talk just as guys do. And they are just as susceptible to social pressure and perceptions, so are far more likely to talk the talk.

 

[deleted1138933]

Your actions (never attempting a relationship) belie your words. If penis size wasn't an overriding concern to you, then why have you never had a relationship?

Regarding size, your 5 inch penis is by every definable statistic well within "medium". The majority of men fall within an inch of your size. 5 inches is the median, and 5.2 inches is the average. So every woman you have talked to has stated they prefer YOU over small. And that's without even taking into account that women engage in locker room talk just as guys do. And they are just as susceptible to social pressure and perceptions, so are far more likely to talk the talk.

Its slightly below average, so even by this definition would fail to be medium.

Regardless: You are confusing statistical sizes (average, below average, above average) with real sizes (large, medium, small). Average has nothing to do with real sizes


All average means is where majority of a range fall divided by the total number of the sample.


If for some reason 90% of men with 7”+ cocks would be eliminated (war, disease, or whatever) and sample measurements would be taken thereafter, the “average” size would significantly decrease. Does not mean a 3” dick is suddenly medium or large.


Likewise, if for some reason 90% of men with 6”- dicks would be eliminated (war, disease, or whatever) and sample measurements would be taken thereafter, the “average” size would significantly increase. Does not mean a 7” cock is suddenly medium or small.

 

[hammer75]

I want to address this separately from your entire post (which was very inciteful).

It is not diminishing his experience when someone puts it in perspective. He's talked to, and listened to some women. They had comments about penises. He has taken those comments and used them as a justification for spending his entire adult life without a female relationship. That is not what a person with good emotional health does. According to his posts he's 42 years old. He said he recently moved back to his mother's home. No mention that she required his care. None of this adds up to a healthy emotional existence.

He is passing up the experience of parenthood, of building a family and a complete life. Out of fear of rejection over penis size. And he isn't even small...he's damn near at the statistical median, and well within the statistical average group that the majority of men fall within...he's in the fat middle of the bell curve. He's a good looking guy in decent shape. His photos show he can maintain an erection.

In short, except for his head, he could have a good life. But here we are....

. I would pay a pretty penny to have an in shape physique such as his. I would agree that at his age and what looks to be an above average body and the ability to get a rock hard erection would be an indicator of
good reproductive chances with someone. I know of cases where people just waited to long, too picky or career obsessed to make time but I don’t think that’s the case here. Nothing from nothing I’m not whatnot would call good looking, I’m 50 pounds overweight easy and have had nothing but ed problems since my late twenties and I’ve been married twice. I don’t want to rule out statistical outliers but usually if it looks and smells like it.... which is too bad because he could be somebody’s dream.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

Its slightly below average, so even by this definition would fail to be medium.

Regardless: You are confusing statistical sizes (average, below average, above average) with real sizes (large, medium, small). Average has nothing to do with real sizes


All average means is where majority of a range fall divided by the total number of the sample.


If for some reason 90% of men with 7”+ cocks would be eliminated (war, disease, or whatever) and sample measurements would be taken thereafter, the “average” size would significantly decrease. Does not mean a 3” dick is suddenly medium or large.


Likewise, if for some reason 90% of men with 6”- dicks would be eliminated (war, disease, or whatever) and sample measurements would be taken thereafter, the “average” size would significantly increase. Does not mean a 7” cock is suddenly medium or small.

You just literally reposted the same jibberish. It was inaccurate a page ago and hasn't improved.


None of these hypotheticals will happen, but you still clearly do not understand statistics and how they relate to "reality". Statistics are as real as any other form of mathematics. They are based upon observation, measurement and collection of data...from real life.

You don't have a 3" dick, so it's irrelevant where 3" dicks fall in comparison if 7"+dicks are gone. And if they did disappear, the saying, "In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man shall be king" applies. Everything being relative, 3" becomes the median. The average will still be far higher, as most men happen to be.....about 5 inches. Just. Like. You.

Back here in the real world, 5" is median, average and well within every reasonable definition of "medium".

Breaking up sizes, 1"-3", 3"-6", 6"-9", 5 inches is up in the higher side of the medium group. And even if you believe in unicorns, 1"-4", 4"-8", 8"-12", 5 inches is still comfortably in that medium size group. So medium.

In statistical surveys, about 80% of men are within 4 to 6 inches. Even within this subgroup, 5 inches is right smack in the center. So medium.

And the statistical average is about 5.2 inches. That's a compilation of worldwide surveys taken by a large variety of medical and research sources for as many different reasons. The total sample group is thousands of men. So.....medium.


Sorry buddy, but you've been hoisted by your own petard. Not that this will change anything....you'll remain the same miserable bastard you obviously want to be.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

If we take Harry at his word, that his 5" penis is "small", then let's look at the world through his eyes.....

Everything from 1" or less, up to 5", is small. That's a range of 5 inches from the "small" group. Let's just go with a 4" group size, as under 1" is so unlikely as to be statistically irrelevant.

So then, even if Harry is right at the top end of "small", with a 5.1" penis being the bottom of "medium" sizes, then using the same ~4-inch group size, medium is 5.1"-9", and "large" BEGINS at 9.1".

Ummm, how many legitimately photographed non-Photoshopped accurately measured penises have we seen here, in this site with hundreds of thousands of posted photos and videos...of 9" penises? And that's just the high end of "medium" in Harry's world, if 5" is still "small". Apparently the fact that not one member has even come forward to attempt, let alone claim, the prize for a 10-inch penis....well that has no bearing.

Unicorns.....they're out there...... Shhhhhhh, don't disturb them.....

 

[1352661]

My ex and her girlfriends always talked about size.