not really.That's literally the entire fashion industry nowadays.
who? Giampaolo Sgura and Smiggi seems very respctful of the models to me. I don't see them as "creepy". Can't say the same for the others photographers.not really.
this is a fucked up publication. photos and stylists, all creeps. bye
Any new shot of Chad we haven't seen?I have received my copy today and I would say the glossy papers and the placement of different editorials, alternating between nudity and non-nudity certainly make this issue a decent issue. Even with models who do commit to onlyfan they are being shot in a different light, which makes the content less redundant and feels a bit more exclusive. The only complaint I might have is that if big names are going to use to push orders, at least shot them in a different light. Chad White despite being a huge name in the industry but that aspect of him is nothing really new. I would say like Eliot Meeten, and how he was shown in the first issue was probably the best example of how a more established fashion model can be shot in a way that does not require frontal but still remains very sensual and sexual.
I would say this issue is on par with the quality of issue 4 which filled a big shoe after issue 3.
Since the uncensored pic isn't published in the new issue, did anyone buy it on his OnlyFans and are willing to share? If you have it and don't wanna share in public, msg me and I have something to swap.Is someone interested in buying this for the team?
Jakob Jokerst.who is Mr Armani ?
Who is him? He's absolutely amazing Man .
Who is him? He's absolutely amazing Man .
What is his full name?Ivan by Smiggi
I'd feel certain any nudity is negotiated far in advance of actual photo shoot. If you look at modelmayhem.com, quite a few models are listed, with most stating whether they'll 'Shoot Nudes' plainly on their profiles. While some will state 'shoot nudes' other will go even further stating 'Erotic Nudes Only', which to me are what Chad White has only done so far. Full Nudity, but no full frontal nudity.My understanding is that they want the hard copy to be like collector's item. This is why they don't mind too much that images have been posted or shared on Instagram or other sites. Instead, this is to create buzz. If someone really wants to own high quality prints of the images, they would purchase the print copy. It is like one can find mp3 of songs all over the internet easily but if you want quality sound, one will still purchase vinyl record.
Whether they have any other intention, I can't comment. But I am still grateful that they operate this way instead of the usual subscription model, i.e. you have to pay and subscribe to the magazine site to view any images. Usually not many images are released in that way and in some cases, just like some OnlyFan creators, they will threaten to take legal action if their images are being posted and shared.
Are the photographers and owner just some pervy people? I don't know them so I can't say. But if this is what it is really about, I would imagine there is no need to create a magazine just to 'trick' models to drop trousers for them. There are other ways in the industry, e.g. casting process. Also, why they would bother to even release any of the images to the publics? So I would rather be thankful that some publishers, photographers and models are willing to work on this magazine so that we are able to celebrate male naked bodies. If you think about it, if they stop the whole thing of Yummyzine tomorrow, those photographers and publishers are likely still get to see the models naked, just not us. It is a bit strange that we should be negative towards it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.