Photos & Videos Yummyzine

Yummy plus is inactive in those days :(
It hasn’t been inactive at all! They drop new content at least twice a week and now they drop also photo stories but I’ve notice that they are more complete than the ones in the magazine, like if the magazine has 10 images, they are dropping 30!

Also I found Kauã’s video part II more sexy and lengthy than part one.

Last week they posted shit content but this week they posted lots of stuff!
 
For me, the video content is really shit right now. The videos included in the subscription are terrible, with little or no full frontal of the models. They're splitting the paid videos into several parts and for very high prices. It's not worth it at all. But the digital magazines, when included in the subscription, are good. I don't understand why subscribe if 90% of the good content has to be paid for separately at very high prices.
 
For me, the video content is really shit right now. The videos included in the subscription are terrible, with little or no full frontal of the models. They're splitting the paid videos into several parts and for very high prices. It's not worth it at all. But the digital magazines, when included in the subscription, are good. I don't understand why subscribe if 90% of the good content has to be paid for separately at very high prices.
Digital magazines included in the subscription???
 
Digital magazines included in the subscription???
Yes, they call a digital magazine an archive with the complete photoshoot of a specific model that was in a print edition, and some of these models are available at no extra charge, but for other models, they are charging up to $20 or $25 for a photoshoot with 26 photos. And so far, all the digital magazines are of models whose uncensored photos they had already posted in the unwrap emails
 
For me, the video content is really shit right now. The videos included in the subscription are terrible, with little or no full frontal of the models. They're splitting the paid videos into several parts and for very high prices. It's not worth it at all. But the digital magazines, when included in the subscription, are good. I don't understand why subscribe if 90% of the good content has to be paid for separately at very high prices.
I don’t think it’s bad at all. They’re still posting all the models they’re shooting, and for 19 dollars you’re actually getting a lot. Yesterday we had Lukas and Pavel for free, Kiryl for just 7 dollars, and Dmitry for 20. Plus some really nice photo stories of models I really wanted to see with images that weren’t in the magazines for no extra cost.

People forget that around 90% of these guys are professional male models who don’t have an OnlyFans, or they’re unknowns discovered by them who some then gain visibility and become models. If you subscribe to Pietro Boselli’s OF, you pay like 15 dollars plus 100 dollars for a 30-second clip. Here, you’re getting tons of exclusive guys you won’t see anywhere else in 3-minute videos for 20–40 dollars, on top of the subscription, and still lots of free content.

The truth is people are never satisfied. They used to complain that Yummy didn’t feature enough fashion models and had too many guys from OnlyFans. Now that Yummy is basically offering only fashion models or guys without OF, they’re still complaining. They use to complain that Yummy should create a platform with backstage videos like the Warwick Rowers (which had videos for 150 dollars btw) and now that they did it, they’re still not happy.

Let’s be real: these videos should cost way more compared to what’s out there. Yummy, if you’re reading this, please don’t charge less than 100 dollars for Jonathan Kranebitter’s video or Giorgio Ramondetta’s nude videos if you ever launch some. There are way less interesting OF creators charging 60–100 dollars just to show a glimpse of their dick, so don’t try to please the complainers. They don’t deserve it. Raise your prices instead, it’s too cheap for what your offering!
 
There are two types of people: one who values their money and knows how to recognize bad service, and the other who thinks it's cool to pay $19 for a subscription that releases two super short videos per week. Last week, both videos were without frontal nudity, and this week's videos, as he said, "for free," were by Lukas Kuchen and Pavel Datsyuk. Lukas isn't nude in the frontal and Pavel is a boring 2 minute video. This type of person is content to be fooled into paying for other short videos that cost $20 and $40, and even split into several parts, because Yummy doesn't think you should pay that amount for a single 8 to 10 minute video; they think you should pay for cut-down 3 minute videos of the same model. Choose for yourself what kind of person you are; you are free to do so.
 
I don’t think it’s bad at all. They’re still posting all the models they’re shooting, and for 19 dollars you’re actually getting a lot. Yesterday we had Lukas and Pavel for free, Kiryl for just 7 dollars, and Dmitry for 20. Plus some really nice photo stories of models I really wanted to see with images that weren’t in the magazines for no extra cost.

People forget that around 90% of these guys are professional male models who don’t have an OnlyFans, or they’re unknowns discovered by them who some then gain visibility and become models. If you subscribe to Pietro Boselli’s OF, you pay like 15 dollars plus 100 dollars for a 30-second clip. Here, you’re getting tons of exclusive guys you won’t see anywhere else in 3-minute videos for 20–40 dollars, on top of the subscription, and still lots of free content.

The truth is people are never satisfied. They used to complain that Yummy didn’t feature enough fashion models and had too many guys from OnlyFans. Now that Yummy is basically offering only fashion models or guys without OF, they’re still complaining. They use to complain that Yummy should create a platform with backstage videos like the Warwick Rowers (which had videos for 150 dollars btw) and now that they did it, they’re still not happy.

Let’s be real: these videos should cost way more compared to what’s out there. Yummy, if you’re reading this, please don’t charge less than 100 dollars for Jonathan Kranebitter’s video or Giorgio Ramondetta’s nude videos if you ever launch some. There are way less interesting OF creators charging 60–100 dollars just to show a glimpse of their dick, so don’t try to please the complainers. They don’t deserve it. Raise your prices instead, it’s too cheap for what your offering!
Can you specify which Lukas, please? :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: alexscott1818