Photos & Videos Yummyzine

You're completely insane. Who the hell would pay to watch a fake AI video? They can create the most beautiful man in the world, so what? It's fake, for God's sake. People have a mental problem, a lack of affection, or an inner void that makes them seek affection, love, fall in love, or even get aroused by an AI image. I would literally prefer someone to get aroused by Michelangelo's David in Florence; at least that one actually exists and has been an icon of male beauty for centuries. It's just that throughout history, people have been sane enough not to fall in love with something fake. Get help. The most famous OnlyFans model is AI, so what? That's a sign of the epidemic of mental illness in modern societies. Does anyone here want a real life and to meet the love of their life? A real person with feelings whose beauty you can actually feel? Or do you just want to spend the rest of your lives masturbating like losers to videos of men you wouldn't even have the guts to say hello to if you had them in front of you?

As for the prices, well, it's truly unbelievable that you prioritize the company's well-being over that of your users. It's like going to the supermarket and wanting to pay triple so the company can stay afloat—it's truly stupid. It's also unbelievable that you feel special for having these videos, like, "Wow, I'm so exclusive and elitist for having videos of penises." I've already paid for a year's subscription and bought videos separately, and guess how Yummy paid me back? They reduced my rewards. The day some Russian guy, who can't be sued or have his credit card charged, buys most of the videos and posts them on every cheap porn site on the internet, and everyone downloads them and makes hundreds of copies, I assure you I won't shed a single tear for Yummy, but I will smile remembering that some really stupid guy's bubble of superiority burst.
If you are constantly telling the magazine which models you want to see, what type of models they should feature, and how you would like the content to look, why can't I express my own opinion as well?

At no point did I say they should replace everything with AI. What I said was that they could introduce AI generated models as a form of exclusive digital art that exists only within the magazine, complementary to the real models and not as a replacement. Why is my opinion somehow less valid than yours? If the best selling model in the world is an AI girl it means everyone who supports it is wrong and you are right? Why can’t you accept that maybe people like different things and that is ok?

Hentai is enormously popular, particularly across Asia and Japan, and many people genuinely prefer it to content featuring real people. Does that automatically mean millions of people are sick? Of course not. People have different tastes, and whether you agree with them or not is irrelevant.

As for your suggestion that all of their content should be leaked is somehow fair, that position makes absolutely no sense. The people you are hurting are the very models who trusted the magazine with their work, along with the artists and everyone involved in creating the content. If enough people adopt that mentality, the platform either disappears altogether or is forced to rely more heavily on creators who already monetize themselves elsewhere, which seems to be the very thing you complain about the most.

What's particularly ironic is that you say, "it's just dicks," as if none of this matters. Yet the moment someone has an OnlyFans account, suddenly it's treated as some kind of catastrophe and “Omg, onlyfans, their level is going down! Blasfemy!”. You are the one placing those creators on a inferior level but If it's all supposedly the same to you and it is “all dicks”, why does it bother you so much when one of them appears? The contradiction is obvious. You expect Yummy to always deliver superior models, which means you are already placing it in a premium level in comparison to other platforms, even without noticing it.

Honestly, I sometimes wonder why I waste my time arguing with people here.

Anyway, changing the subject, the new Jonathan video is incredible. It's genuinely sexy while still feeling artistic at the same time. I wouldn't be surprised if it opens doors for him professionally as a model, just as similar projects have done for many others. We should simply enjoy seeing him in his full glory while we have the chance.
 
Rick Day charges $25 and offers one or two stories on Fridays and basically zero videos or like two twenty second clips, with models that are nowhere near as good. So why exactly should Yummy charge only $19?
Perhaps Rick Day is overly charged for crap content so it should be him reducing his price to below $19? Just another way to look at this......
 
Regarding the monthly coin rewards, our intention from the beginning was never to implement a completely flat reward system. That structure was initially introduced by our developers because it was the standard configuration of the platform at the time and, unfortunately, it could not be customised.

From our perspective, a fixed reward such as 25 coins does not align very naturally with the pricing structure of our platform, where our most popular products follow values such as 20, 40, 60, etc.

Our long term objective has always been to develop a more advanced and intelligent reward system, ideally powered by AI, that can offer personalised coin rewards based on engagement and support of the platform. For example, rewards could vary depending on purchases, subscription length, activity and overall engagement, allowing our most loyal customers to receive more meaningful benefits. This has always been the vision we hoped to build towards.

As for some stories being offered separately as paid content, this is often connected to the fact that we need to negotiate permissions and specific conditions with both the talent, agents and the artists involved in order to make certain content available on the platform.

A typical story usually contains around 25 to 30 images, with very few exceptions, which often works out to approximately 1 to 2 dollars per image. In many situations, the alternative would simply be for the content not to be available at all, as these decisions do not depend exclusively on us.

Working with artists, managers, agencies and talent is not always straightforward, as every individual has their own boundaries, preferences and agreements that we fully respect. For example, Sasha does not allow us to include his models in the Unwrap section of the platform, which is why you rarely see his content featured there.

Ultimately, there is usually a reason behind these decisions, and a large part of our work involves diplomacy, balancing relationships and respecting the wishes of the people who create the content. Because of that, we would always prefer to have the full stories and outtakes available in some form rather than not have the content available at all.

At the same time, we continuously try to maintain a fair balance between separately paid content and subscription based content, so Yummy Plus continues to provide strong value for all subscribers and supporters.

We have also contacted some of the models you suggested and have already organised shoots with a few of them.

Thank you again for your support, positive criticism and for helping us discover such great talent!
Gianluca Volgare

He was featured on Yummy's Instagram and X in early May, but his work still isn't on Yummy+ for now.
Am I the only one who's unhappy about that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tsgarp
Before Yummy raised their prices on some videos, I recommended they do exactly that many times over on this forum so they could filter out customers that don’t really matter and attract more exclusive customers, like me, who can actually afford to spend more. I commend them for it because it’s a strategy many premium brands use, and honestly, I also think they should raise the subscription price. Rick Day charges $25 and offers one or two stories on Fridays and basically zero videos or like two twenty second clips, with models that are nowhere near as good. So why exactly should Yummy charge only $19?

Another recommendation I would make is the introduction of AI models. The most popular OnlyFans model in the world is literally an AI girl. She makes more money than most real women on the platform. Imagine Yummy having its own exclusive, never before seen AI men that look completely real and impossibly beautiful. Honestly, that would be genius.

I hope Yummy reads this and once again considers my proposals. I’ve always been strangely good at predicting their next move and no, before anyone starts saying it, I do not work for them either. I just love the brand!
If they start featuring AI models, I will immediately quit ...
 
Before Yummy raised their prices on some videos, I recommended they do exactly that many times over on this forum so they could filter out customers that don’t really matter and attract more exclusive customers, like me, who can actually afford to spend more. I commend them for it because it’s a strategy many premium brands use, and honestly, I also think they should raise the subscription price. Rick Day charges $25 and offers one or two stories on Fridays and basically zero videos or like two twenty second clips, with models that are nowhere near as good. So why exactly should Yummy charge only $19?

Another recommendation I would make is the introduction of AI models. The most popular OnlyFans model in the world is literally an AI girl. She makes more money than most real women on the platform. Imagine Yummy having its own exclusive, never before seen AI men that look completely real and impossibly beautiful. Honestly, that would be genius.

I hope Yummy reads this and once again considers my proposals. I’ve always been strangely good at predicting their next move and no, before anyone starts saying it, I do not work for them either. I just love the brand!
It getting worse and worse :joy:
 
He is a real person.
Yeah. His stuff on modelmayhem goes back to 2023, and none of the image generation models were good enough for that back then. I think his stuff is just heavily touched up. Super heavily.

I've noticed this trend of people recognizing AI only by its heavy postprocessing rather than the inherent content, both for audio and images. But the funny thing is, this postprocessing they use for all AI images and audio is largely the exact same technology we've been using, often for decades. While I'm glad people are asking these questions and not blindly accepting AI in place of reality, I honestly fear the backswing where people have seen far more AI and/or heavily filtered/postprocessed content than they have actual real people in the real world that they doubt that real things can even be real (that whole scenario is just ripe for conspiratorial delusions).
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: NPTH and paul555
I want to see his dick so bad
Me too, but no video so far ... I do not understand, cause Vincenzo did his shoot end of April '26 in South-Africa at the same time Leonardo Castaldo did his shoot. We are talking about 2 separated shoots, not one shoot of them both. Vincenzo & Castaldo has been seen together on backstage Insta pics.

Castaldo has already been covered in 2025 and his second shoot (the one of end of April '26) was released a few weeks ago. If I were @Yummyzine, I would have featured Vincenzo as new model first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NPTH and Sveno
After reducing the amount of coins, today they didn't give me a single one. Furthermore, they're also making me sign a document in which one essentially has to waive the presumption of innocence and the right to sue them, and obviously give them permission to invoice $150,000 if they have "suspicions."