^It took you this long to figure that out?
This my first foray into this thread and I figured that out by the end of the first page... The guy has a little dick. Getting online and trying to argue that big dicks suck is his coping mechanism.
I know! I know! :redface: :redface: :redface:
I always give too much benefit of the doubt.
It's like he's got the "whatever-is-opposite-of" SPH syndrome.
For whatever reason, he set his sights on you; are there any recently banned members with whom you had enough bad blood for a zombie sock-puppet to rise up and attack?
Honestly, no! I can't think of a single one. It's really been that long since I've been trolled. I don't think I've been trolled in months now.
At least I think so. Unless he happened to make so little of a mark on me that I forgot him. :shrug:
It's like he's got the "whatever-is-opposite-of" SPH syndrome.
For whatever reason, he set his sights on you; are there any recently banned members with whom you had enough bad blood for a zombie sock-puppet to rise up and attack?
Yeah, only if you take what he wrote out of context.
I think that he's playing a game of semantics because without looking at his link (that he provided later) and reading the context of how he used the term "roof" in the first post that he used it in, he implied that he meant that the cervix is at the end of the vagina.
First of all, it's only the "top" when looking at the diagram or if she's in missionary position. It's the "bottom" when she's in doggy style, and the "front" when she's standing up, and which you don't need to tell me or show me a diagram to "prove" since I have a vagina.
And if that's what he really meant, then that doesn't make any sense in the context of how he was using the word in his post since it occupies so little real estate in the entire vagina and it has nothing to do with large cocks. It no longer makes sense the way he's ranting about 10" cocks! IF the cervix were as without feeling as he claims, the fact that an area on one side (a more accurate description) of the vagina has less feeling than the rest of the vagina would be meaningless in the context of his overall argument about whether or not it feels anything when big cocks touch it. (My own cervix is only 2.75" inside my vagina. I'm almost all cul-de-sac! Obviously ALL penises touch mine, and keeping that fact in mind while reading his rant about 10" cocks makes him look like an ignorant fool.) His entire point was that he doesn't believe that it's sensitive (tell that to a woman!) and that since it's at the back where a big cock would hit it, that the fact that it's "without feeling" means that we don't need big cocks. How does that reasoning NOT imply that he meant that the cervix is at the very back end of the vagina?
^ "zombie sock puppet"?!!! ROTFLMAO!!! Bbucko I am now blaming you for the burning sensation I have from shooting ginger ale out of my nose! lol
sigh. it means that when she is aroused her cervix moves out of the way as the vagina tents allowing for a longer than 3 inch dick to slide past into the cul-du-sac providing the angle is right...wait, how come I, as a gay man, understand this stuff, when so straight men (not all, but a fair amount) don`t? Damn people, read a book; surf the web, read petites posts! lol *shakes head*So... you're vagna's like 3" basically? You mean not aroused right? What if you have a big penis in there? He just doesn't fit or he goes through the cervix?
It was a small price to pay for a good laugh! Bloody disGUSTing to clean up though (ginger ale and stuffy allergy nose...eewwwww) On the plus side my sinues are flushed (and smell all evervescently fresh!):biggrin1::biggrin1:
So... you're vagna's like 3" basically? You mean not aroused right? What if you have a big penis in there? He just doesn't fit or he goes through the cervix?
forgot to correct you on the whole "go through the cervix" thing. The cervix is open (dialated) during birth. As hsarge,petite and others have pointed outz. not only is a cock NOT going in through that, but if a guy is foolish enough to try, it may well be the last fool thing he does try. ever.
Well, with all of --ahem-- 15 posts to his credit, he seems mighty quick on the trigger.
Ju' sayin'
So... you're vagna's like 3" basically? You mean not aroused right? What if you have a big penis in there? He just doesn't fit or he goes through the cervix?
sigh. it means that when she is aroused her cervix moves out of the way as the vagina tents allowing for a longer than 3 inch dick to slide past into the cul-du-sac providing the angle is right...wait, how come I, as a gay man, understand this stuff, when so straight men (not all, but a fair amount) don`t? Damn people, read a book; surf the web, read petites posts! lol *shakes head*
forgot to correct you on the whole "go through the cervix" thing. The cervix is open (dialated) during birth. As hsarge,petite and others have pointed outz. not only is a cock NOT going in through that, but if a guy is foolish enough to try, it may well be the last fool thing he does try. ever.
damn qoute function! it didn`t take and now it looks like i am ranting at petite! honey you know i wasn`t! lol I was trying to answer black legend. *blush*
I didn't read every post in the thread and may have miss that discussion.
And I don't know... I've read the stuff, but it all still baffles me. No need for the attitude.
Good grief, it's probably in the top 3 of things I talk about in the women's issues forum! At least it seems like it.
I agree with you that a large cock is visually stimulating. I prefer looking at a larger one, too.
However, there are some women who do prefer the feeling of a large cock and some of them are members of this site, and I believe them when they say that they prefer one for their sexual satisfaction. I personally believe that they're probably in the minority, and I have many reasons for believing so. If the OP had stopped being making ignorant proclamations about what women can and cannot feel with their vaginas and explored the other parts of his argument, or possibly even, I don't know, asked me what I agreed with him about or why I agree with him, then I would have shared and we could have talked about that, but no, he's just another ignorant guy on here telling women what they're supposed to think, because even though he doesn't have a vagina, he knows what it's like to have one better than we do.