Moderator elections?

madame_zora said:
... he OWNS the site and doesn't owe it to anyone to do things any way other than how he chooses. As members, we can choose to stay and participate, or leave- but it is absurd to suggest that ANYONE should hold elections for moderators for a site he owns!
You know, for the most part, I agree with you, at least as far as the premise that it’s Rob’s business and he is absolutely free to select the moderator or operating parameters as he chooses with no input from the users. But the concept of moderator elections isn’t as absurd a request as you make it out to be.

Many boards have elected moderators or advisor boards, and I think they’re there for a reason. Remember that, unlike traditional brick and mortar businesses, an internet board has value because of its members. Collectively we give away content to the board and then purchase it back, either through subscriptions or ad views. Without member interaction, postings and the galleries, there would be little value here.

I can’t think of a parallel brick and mortar business, where the business owner supplies only the venue and the customers supply the product. I imagine if there were one, the recognition of the importance of customer satisfaction would pale in comparison to, say, the perceptions at your typical five and dime store.
 
BuddyBoy, there was feedback involved....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lex
Also--the board onwer Rob_E selected the Moderator Team. IIRC, he solicited some member recommendations beforehand.


alex8 said:
I don't think it's revealing too much to say that he also listened carefully to several posters who had issues with some of his proposed candidates, and that several of those whom he proposed as mods refused the position, meaning that those who did ultimately become mods both wanted the position and met with no general resistance.
quote]

I don't feel that moderator elections would work for this board.
 
GoneA said:
No, after that statement, I'm pretty sure he's President Bush.

No, President Bush is Lex who's Zora who's DMW who's me who's you who's Matthew who's President Bush (hence his avatar). Get with the agenda, GoneA. :rolleyes:
 
Buddy Boy, you're right about that. Perhaps a better anaology would be a civic association or ANY group where there is member participation. It's rarely the newest members who drive the focus. Can you honestly imagine a situation where a terms of sevice could possibly be written that would satisfy everyone? I can't. I also can't imagine ANY moderator or moderation team that would be acceptable to everyone. Honestly, from MY experience of being a mod, it is my opinion that there are some people who live to find fault, and would find it anywhere.

Please understand, this is a discussion board and I do understand the individual contribution of each of us as valuable, according to our contributions. It's still kind of a moot point- the site IS owned, and not by the group.

I don't know what specifically led to initiating this thread, but the general idea comes up a lot. I wish I'd had to money to buy the site, but I did not. Everyone here had that opportunity, but Rob was the one who peeled off the cash. While I have no objection to discussions about whatever seems of interest, I was just pointing out that it will have little actual impact on anything. I completely expect it to come up over and over, and it seems like a waste of energy. I felt it somewhat valuable to point out to people that they're wasting keystrokes, even knowing that I'll probably be delivering this speech many times before I die or leave.

For me, the good outweighs the bad, which is why I keep logging in. When I "get too close" and things start getting on my nerves for real, I take a break. I think a lot of us find that valuable from time to time, it gives a little clarity as to what we get out of the place as a whole.
 
Sorcerer said:
They accuse me of being you which makes this more confusing.
So far in my time here, I've also been accused of being DMW, a Dutch man, an American pretending to be a German, and an Egyptian woman.

So you have to be all those people too, I'm afraid. You may need to brush up on your accent work for some of these rôles. :rolleyes:
 
alex8 said:
Obviously. I don't talk to myself for fun, y'know. :rolleyes:

Oh but that's quite impossible on this board. That is, in your case, talking to yourself would actually be talking to "DMW" ... but of course he's Madame Zora.
 
Sorcerer said:
They accuse me of being you which makes this more confusing.

Didn't you know there's really only five people on this site? We're all gay men and Spladle would fuck us all in the ass.:biggrin1:
 
alex8 said:
So far in my time here, I've also been accused of being DMW, a Dutch man, an American pretending to be a German, and an Egyptian woman.

So you have to be all those people too, I'm afraid. You may need to brush up on your accent work for some of these rĂ´les. :rolleyes:

HAHAHA, an egyptian woman...:rolleyes: You do have Pretty eyes, Alex.

If it makes you feel better, I have been accused of being you, Windtalkerways, Stronzo, A fake, and a bitch:rolleyes:
 
alex8 said:
No, President Bush is Lex who's Zora who's DMW who's me who's you who's Matthew who's President Bush (hence his avatar). Get with the agenda, GoneA. :rolleyes:

Not now, but soon, I will finally break this chain by proving definitively that GoneA is in fact NOT me.