PC or Mac
- Thread starter thick_1
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2005
- Posts
- 9,124
- Media
- 127
- Likes
- 20,230
- Points
- 568
- Age
- 60
- Location
- Unadilla, Georgia, United States
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2006
- Posts
- 17,102
- Media
- 22
- Likes
- 44,518
- Points
- 618
- Location
- Seattle, Washington, US
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
OK, that's modern... now, ville20, try to import some lightbulbs to your country, so we can see your cock in your pics!
:smile: Onan
D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
Mo here.
I use a PC desktop and an iBook, so my hardware allegiance is split.
I guess I really prefer Mac, because when the desktop starts to fade, a plan to buy an iMac.
I use a PC desktop and an iBook, so my hardware allegiance is split.
I guess I really prefer Mac, because when the desktop starts to fade, a plan to buy an iMac.
I'm gay and I use an iMac. Just switched to Mac last year and I love it. Funny thing, I bought my mother a PC for Christmas, a month before buying my iMac. Her PC already takes up to 3 minutes to boot up, while my iMac still starts up like new. It takes her PC forever to bring up a program, and my iMac still brings up programs almost as quickly as I can click the icons. The only down side is that in order to get ANYTHING for it I HAVE to go to the Mac store which is at least 20 miles from me on either side. But, the customer service is impressive. It's nice to deal with people within the country.
Mac. I switched to one when coming to College 2 years ago (ibook). I can't imagine going back to PCs. I get frustrated when I have to go into computer labs here that are all PCs. Plus, If I had gotten a PC when I started college, I would be ready to purchase a new one. MY ibook will last til I graduate, if not longer
Hellboy0
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2007
- Posts
- 2,362
- Media
- 23
- Likes
- 288
- Points
- 208
- Location
- West Coast Australia
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
horneyoldguy
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2007
- Posts
- 860
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 56
- Points
- 163
- Location
- In the USA
- Sexuality
- 90% Straight, 10% Gay
- Gender
- Male
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2007
- Posts
- 4,924
- Media
- 18
- Likes
- 11,409
- Points
- 743
- Location
- Cardiff (Wales)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2007
- Posts
- 4,924
- Media
- 18
- Likes
- 11,409
- Points
- 743
- Location
- Cardiff (Wales)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
What I meant was I wouldn't buy a Windows machine or use it as my primary computer. I would use one if that's all that were available. If someone had offered to give me a Windows machine when I was in need of a new computer I would still have bought a Mac. I just intensely dislike Windows.
I would use Linux, Free BSD, or Solaris, though.
Captain Elephant
Cherished Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2006
- Posts
- 800
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 255
- Points
- 263
- Location
- North Central Florida
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Well, I'm hetero-sexual but I guess I just found out I'm homo-technical.
I'm a musician and you can't beat a Mac for its music capabilities. Had a PC up to three years ago to do the same thing, but Mac does it right out of the box.
I think a PC is female and a Mac is male.
The PC has so many buttons and switches to make it work, just like a woman. Like flying a 747.
But a Mac has one button on the mouse, just like a guy - one button will do it.
I'm a musician and you can't beat a Mac for its music capabilities. Had a PC up to three years ago to do the same thing, but Mac does it right out of the box.
I think a PC is female and a Mac is male.
The PC has so many buttons and switches to make it work, just like a woman. Like flying a 747.
But a Mac has one button on the mouse, just like a guy - one button will do it.
I tried posting, but my internet crashed.
PC all the way. I've used both, and PC's outstripe in my book for many reasons.
First and foremost, cost vs quality.
If you want something safe and all that, run Linux for free, instead of spending 3k on a Mac that can cost you 1.5 with Linux. Mac's truly are for people who just want things EASY and done for them. Who don't want to think, and want everything all pretty.
Hell for that matter, Ubuntu can do all that + cool stuff like Beryl and the like.
Also, when it comes down to gaming, hands down Windows. You wont see any serious gamers on Macs because the support isn't there, and the overhead is actually quite a bit. You talk about loading times? Learn to not be an idiot. All my PC's start up fast because I don't let spyware and extra crap on it. Sure Windows will get that stuff and mac's wont: but Mac's aren't being targeted; they dont have the market share to make it work a hackers trouble to write code for their Kernel. They can still be hacked, people just don't normally bother learning. It's much more convenient to know how to Hack a Windows system: And don't even bother trying to hack a Linux box.
Note: Linux = PC to me.
And finally: Vista. Honestly it's a good OS. Overhead? Of course, but they said the same thing about XP when it was released. Security? is actually good now, took some time and with SP1 coming out, it'll be even better. Takes some getting used to, but I've been running it since Beta 2 and love it.
PC all the way. Sidenote: at ITT Tech where I attend school, we learn Linux and Windows: Our Mac's literally have dust on them, and are only used once in a great while by the Graphic Art students. Honestly it's kinda sad because 100% of Mac's are VERY GOOD in terms of hardware; they have some serious balls - and need them to run OSX (And would run Vista easily)
Therein lies another problem with Mac's, they need specific hardware to run OSX. Kinda crappy. Install Linux some time, and let your jaw drop when it detects every bit of hardware right down to the weird off brand monitor you're using.
PC all the way. I've used both, and PC's outstripe in my book for many reasons.
First and foremost, cost vs quality.
If you want something safe and all that, run Linux for free, instead of spending 3k on a Mac that can cost you 1.5 with Linux. Mac's truly are for people who just want things EASY and done for them. Who don't want to think, and want everything all pretty.
Hell for that matter, Ubuntu can do all that + cool stuff like Beryl and the like.
Also, when it comes down to gaming, hands down Windows. You wont see any serious gamers on Macs because the support isn't there, and the overhead is actually quite a bit. You talk about loading times? Learn to not be an idiot. All my PC's start up fast because I don't let spyware and extra crap on it. Sure Windows will get that stuff and mac's wont: but Mac's aren't being targeted; they dont have the market share to make it work a hackers trouble to write code for their Kernel. They can still be hacked, people just don't normally bother learning. It's much more convenient to know how to Hack a Windows system: And don't even bother trying to hack a Linux box.
Note: Linux = PC to me.
And finally: Vista. Honestly it's a good OS. Overhead? Of course, but they said the same thing about XP when it was released. Security? is actually good now, took some time and with SP1 coming out, it'll be even better. Takes some getting used to, but I've been running it since Beta 2 and love it.
PC all the way. Sidenote: at ITT Tech where I attend school, we learn Linux and Windows: Our Mac's literally have dust on them, and are only used once in a great while by the Graphic Art students. Honestly it's kinda sad because 100% of Mac's are VERY GOOD in terms of hardware; they have some serious balls - and need them to run OSX (And would run Vista easily)
Therein lies another problem with Mac's, they need specific hardware to run OSX. Kinda crappy. Install Linux some time, and let your jaw drop when it detects every bit of hardware right down to the weird off brand monitor you're using.
Similar threads
