We need a new dating app!

[hungdoode]

probably from 5 inch and above and 2 inch and above for girth.

Honestly not too sure why I prefer em, its just hotter to me lol plus I like to compare sometimes

Marry me lol. Wait what what’s your favorite size range length and girthwise and why do u prefer average?

 

[Aaron89522]

Can we just make sure it doesn’t discriminate against guys that aren’t hung? I tried to join sevenorbetter but because I have less than 7 inches they wouldn’t let me join. And they even let women join so really the only demographic they discriminate against are guys that are under 7 inches. What a horrible way to make guys feel worse about the size of dick they were given (which they already feel bad about)

Smaller guys like big dicks too. And there are big dicks that like average dicks, so there is no reason for us to be discriminated against.

Agreed! I don’t like that website for exactly that reason. This app needs to be for everyone. Big, average, and small, straight, bi, and gay, etc.

 

[Aaron89522]

My suggestion: Just allow folks to filter dick size per a range. They can set the low and high numbers or…no filter at all if they don’t care

And for goodness sake don’t call it something like 7orbetter. That’s telling most men they are worse. And we know we’re worse and would be happier if we were born hung. But we don’t need to be insulted.

7orbigger would be more appropriate

I like that. A size range just like the height and age ranges other apps have.

 

[LetsTalkAboutSize]

Agreed! I don’t like that website for exactly that reason. This app needs to be for everyone. Big, average, and small, straight, bi, and gay, etc.

Can I get an amen!

Yeah I know I’m a good catch. I’m proud of just about everything about me except my dick size. And that site just underlined it clear as day that a lot of people don’t like my size.

 

[LetsTalkAboutSize]

I like that. A size range just like the height and age ranges other apps have.

I will say sniffies does allow you to do this. But there’s no verification process for size

 

[Zevksr]

I love all of those ideas.

1. I don’t think the premium side of the app should price gouge people. It should be affordable for pretty much everyone, it shouldn’t cost more a month than the average OF subscription ($9.99).
2. It should be relatively SFW enough that a large amount of people feel comfortable joining.
3. The verification process should be relatively simple, but also be practically impossible to fake. I guess two pictures should be required, one picture next to an object that is ubiquitous and whose dimensions are uniform (a bottle or can for instance) and the second pic should be the ruler or tape measure pic.
4. Verification needs to be a requirement for this app, otherwise what’s the point haha.

Let’s keep up with the brainstorming.

I think we discussed it's going to be mostly SFW, at least the free version. While for verification purposes, the images should be indeed dimensioned as stated using compared pics, looking for specific sizes of penis must be a filter available only in the premium version. As I said, very specific filters, including the NSFW, are in the premium app.

I also agree that price gouging should never be a thing - and to an extent - we should turn this practice as something to counter current industry standards
I also agree on the match feature, which should be separate from the grid one. As I suggested, I think the app needs a grid and a match. The match feature must allow 10 free matches per day in populated areas and 15/20 in less populated ones (a 2 M people mark). To enter the matching feature, a verified face pic is mandatory. AI pics must be detected and excluded.
Grids should include 150 free profiles in very populated areas, and 200 in less populated areas. Some cities in the US and Canada tend to be sparsely populated but very sprawled, that's why I propose the 2M people mark.

Concerning safety measures, there should totally be an anti-harrassment feature that uses both IP recognition and face detection measures to avoid some users to create multiple accounts. This allows abusive users to avoid loopholes that allow them to create multiple accounts. On one hand, IP recognition stops multiple accounts to be spammed/opened from an IP address. On the other, facial recognition won't allow abusive users to reopen accounts; the moment they upload a pic identfied either as a fake or as someone who has three conduct strikes, the account immediately gets blocked.

Equally, there should be a revolutionnary safety feature call text "anti-sparrasment" (short for spam harrassment). Essentially someone can get blocked from contacting a profile after - let's say - 10 unanswered messages. This is thought as a measure for those who either have a lot of difficulty respecting boundaries, or actual bots. Getting blocked through this feature doesn't create a strike (it would be too draconian), but an extremely persistent behavior - combined with reports, could be the motive for a strike.

Any other ideas?

 

[Zevksr]

Concerning conduct strikes, they should happen according to current industry standards to avoid online harrassment.

1. Overtly abusive language is 0 tolerance: all forms of name-calling, slurs and such could be the reason for a strike, especially if it is very recurrent in a conversation.
2. Threatening behaviour is definitely a reason for a strike, and any such communication might be surrendered to law enforcement whenever there's a real world situation derived from it.
3. Harrassment should be reported and after thorough revision, such a recurrent behaviour will end in a strike.

Some other ideas for this very important issue?

 

[LetsTalkAboutSize]

I think we discussed it's going to be mostly SFW, at least the free version. While for verification purposes, the images should be indeed dimensioned as stated using compared pics, looking for specific sizes of penis must be a filter available only in the premium version. As I said, very specific filters, including the NSFW, are in the premium app.

I also agree that price gouging should never be a thing - and to an extent - we should turn this practice as something to counter current industry standards
I also agree on the match feature, which should be separate from the grid one. As I suggested, I think the app needs a grid and a match. The match feature must allow 10 free matches per day in populated areas and 15/20 in less populated ones (a 2 M people mark). To enter the matching feature, a verified face pic is mandatory. AI pics must be detected and excluded.
Grids should include 150 free profiles in very populated areas, and 200 in less populated areas. Some cities in the US and Canada tend to be sparsely populated but very sprawled, that's why I propose the 2M people mark.

Concerning safety measures, there should totally be an anti-harrassment feature that uses both IP recognition and face detection measures to avoid some users to create multiple accounts. This allows abusive users to avoid loopholes that allow them to create multiple accounts. On one hand, IP recognition stops multiple accounts to be spammed/opened from an IP address. On the other, facial recognition won't allow abusive users to reopen accounts; the moment they upload a pic identfied either as a fake or as someone who has three conduct strikes, the account immediately gets blocked.

Equally, there should be a revolutionnary safety feature call text "anti-sparrasment" (short for spam harrassment). Essentially someone can get blocked from contacting a profile after - let's say - 10 unanswered messages. This is thought as a measure for those who either have a lot of difficulty respecting boundaries, or actual bots. Getting blocked through this feature doesn't create a strike (it would be too draconian), but an extremely persistent behavior - combined with reports, could be the motive for a strike.

Any other ideas?

I just wonder about guys still doing crazy things to fake their size on verification photos. If all we’re saying is “hold your dick up against a popular object”. For example…altering a tp roll to be smaller to make a dick look bigger beside it isn’t hard to do.

Almost makes me wonder if verification should be a live process where an app admin directs the person to confirm their size via video springing them with questions/requests/specifications that would be hard to fake.

But then that might be too much to manage. And maybe there are measures that can be taken to catch the fakers with a no live verification process that I don’t know of

Just thinking aloud

 

[Aaron89522]

I just wonder about guys still doing crazy things to fake their size on verification photos. If all we’re saying is “hold your dick up against a popular object”. For example…altering a tp roll to be smaller to make a dick look bigger beside it isn’t hard to do.

Almost makes me wonder if verification should be a live process where an app admin directs the person to confirm their size via video springing them with questions/requests/specifications that would be hard to fake.

But then that might be too much to manage. And maybe there are measures that can be taken to catch the fakers with a no live verification process that I don’t know of

Just thinking aloud

There has to be a way that we can have a legitimate verification system that isn’t susceptible to a ton of fake images. It might need to involve a certain angle, a certain way they hold the ruler, maybe a short video of the person measuring themselves from POV?

 

[Aaron89522]

I think we discussed it's going to be mostly SFW, at least the free version. While for verification purposes, the images should be indeed dimensioned as stated using compared pics, looking for specific sizes of penis must be a filter available only in the premium version. As I said, very specific filters, including the NSFW, are in the premium app.

I also agree that price gouging should never be a thing - and to an extent - we should turn this practice as something to counter current industry standards
I also agree on the match feature, which should be separate from the grid one. As I suggested, I think the app needs a grid and a match. The match feature must allow 10 free matches per day in populated areas and 15/20 in less populated ones (a 2 M people mark). To enter the matching feature, a verified face pic is mandatory. AI pics must be detected and excluded.
Grids should include 150 free profiles in very populated areas, and 200 in less populated areas. Some cities in the US and Canada tend to be sparsely populated but very sprawled, that's why I propose the 2M people mark.

Concerning safety measures, there should totally be an anti-harrassment feature that uses both IP recognition and face detection measures to avoid some users to create multiple accounts. This allows abusive users to avoid loopholes that allow them to create multiple accounts. On one hand, IP recognition stops multiple accounts to be spammed/opened from an IP address. On the other, facial recognition won't allow abusive users to reopen accounts; the moment they upload a pic identfied either as a fake or as someone who has three conduct strikes, the account immediately gets blocked.

Equally, there should be a revolutionnary safety feature call text "anti-sparrasment" (short for spam harrassment). Essentially someone can get blocked from contacting a profile after - let's say - 10 unanswered messages. This is thought as a measure for those who either have a lot of difficulty respecting boundaries, or actual bots. Getting blocked through this feature doesn't create a strike (it would be too draconian), but an extremely persistent behavior - combined with reports, could be the motive for a strike.

Any other ideas?

We seem to have a decent amount of the main features flushed out actually

 

[Genuinkguy]

i hate when apps remove the option to filter ethnicity, per example if i feel to be with a black guy, I cant have the choice of having only blacks in my search area.

 

[WilliamG]

So a driving issue being discussed here is the lack of accuracy for the dick measurement..? Would that be the driving force of this app? It would fail. And here's why:

I'm a Sniffies (6" hard) guy with a lot of success on it. Sure some lie about their size... But if they say 9" but are really 7"... I'm good with that. Now if they say they are 150lbs and IRL look morbidly obese... That's a bigger problem for me. The trick many use though is the ultra close up pics. I always ask for a full body with the dick. That separates the wheat from the chaff very quickly. Simply ask for a nude body pic.

Now if you're looking for a big dick... You need to "chum the water" so to speak: This is what I've done:

I found a guy on Sniffies claiming to have a 9" cock. So I post this to his profile of me being able to handle it... Then he takes the bait...

 

[HugoLouvet]

Have you ever heard about TheBlowers ?
I think it's a great one!
TheBlowers.com –Register to become a member in order to get access to the whole site

 

[Genuinkguy]

So a driving issue being discussed here is the lack of accuracy for the dick measurement..? Would that be the driving force of this app? It would fail. And here's why:

I'm a Sniffies (6" hard) guy with a lot of success on it. Sure some lie about their size... But if they say 9" but are really 7"... I'm good with that. Now if they say they are 150lbs and IRL look morbidly obese... That's a bigger problem for me. The trick many use though is the ultra close up pics. I always ask for a full body with the dick. That separates the wheat from the chaff very quickly. Simply ask for a nude body pic.

Now if you're looking for a big dick... You need to "chum the water" so to speak: This is what I've done:

I found a guy on Sniffies claiming to have a 9" cock. So I post this to his profile of me being able to handle it... Then he takes the bait...

that doesnt look 9 inches

 

[WilliamG]

that doesnt look 9 inches

You know that... I know that... But it still felt great in my ass. Tell them what they want to hear.

 

[James Glisten]

The concept is interesting. It would avoid unpleasant surprises. A “review” system left on people's profiles is also very useful because it avoids fakes and bad information. I know that on The Blowers this system exists and honestly it's much more reassuring. Personally, I registered on their site a week ago and I'm not disappointed if you wanna try by yourself : theblowers.com/r

 

[Aaron89522]

The concept is interesting. It would avoid unpleasant surprises. A “review” system left on people's profiles is also very useful because it avoids fakes and bad information. I know that on The Blowers this system exists and honestly it's much more reassuring. Personally, I registered on their site a week ago and I'm not disappointed if you wanna try by yourself : theblowers.com/r

Having a review system is a great idea! It would undermine the ability for fakers to last very long. Honestly it would be only a slight inconvenience for the person interested and a complete discrediting of the person falsely claiming to be whatever size they clearly aren’t.

 

[Genuinkguy]

You know that... I know that... But it still felt great in my ass. Tell them what they want to hear.

but why feeding the lie so that they can keep lying?

 

[Genuinkguy]

Having a review system is a great idea! It would undermine the ability for fakers to last very long. Honestly it would be only a slight inconvenience for the person interested and a complete discrediting of the person falsely claiming to be whatever size they clearly aren’t.

I got this french guy living in London when I was in the UK, exchanged messages, and went abroad to my country for holidays and he also went to the same place as me, I went back to him messaging saying " hey so you always came, would love to meet?" then sent some pics, and he replied saying "hey you are hot, are you into safe or bb??" and I said : " I can do safe if you want, i have XL condoms but i dont know if its enough for you" then he just said "no thank you", and stopped replying to what i said after, I felt disrespected so I tried to let a bad review for his attittude on Blowers, when I found out that I cant, I need his "approval/contact" to review, so whats the point reviewing people when you WILL NEVER find a bad/negative review on someone??

 

[Aaron89522]

I got this french guy living in London when I was in the UK, exchanged messages, and went abroad to my country for holidays and he also went to the same place as me, I went back to him messaging saying " hey so you always came, would love to meet?" then sent some pics, and he replied saying "hey you are hot, are you into safe or bb??" and I said : " I can do safe if you want, i have XL condoms but i dont know if its enough for you" then he just said "no thank you", and stopped replying to what i said after, I felt disrespected so I tried to let a bad review for his attittude on Blowers, when I found out that I cant, I need his "approval/contact" to review, so whats the point reviewing people when you WILL NEVER find a bad/negative review on someone??

Not every review system requires that. And this system can easily be one where people are reviewed without their approval. A thumbs up or down, or a 1-5 star rating, including a required comment for the reason of the rating. This will make it easier for people to see beforehand and easier for fakers to be called out