Big Dreamer,
Go read the post AGAIN. What is not reasonable about our comment?
What is unreasonable is that, without knowing someone
at all, you took the time to
start a thread about his (complimentary!) ratings, and on top of that, to use the word "graffiti" as a description.
Fuck you and the horse you rode in on!
(BTW...I've never heard anyone try to equate use of profanity with lack of reasoning skills. What
do they teach kids in schools these days?)
How about an intelligent arguement at why we should not have commented at all.
First of all, it's spelled "argument." Furthermore:
1) All posts (and especially new threads) are motivated by
something, therefore yours must have had a motivation.
2) Of possible motivations, the most likely is that you have too fragile of an ego to take a rating of "10" at face value. In fact, it appears your ego is
so fragile that not only did a rating without comment disturb you, it disturbed you
so much that you felt compelled to broadcast your insecurity
to the entire site by starting a new thread about someone you don't even know, presumably to boost your
own ego by putting
someone else down. (Did you learn that trick in high school?)
4) Uncut has been here for years. To my knowledge,
no one here has ever complained about his giving them a positive rating.
5) There are lots of reasonable people here. Statistically, it is impossible that we are
all crazy.
6) Given the number of comments Uncut has posted, it is most logical to assume that
you are the one who is being unreasonable. If you'd taken a second to "check yourself," you might have realized that fact before making an ass of yourself, and then compounding your own humiliation by attempting to defend an indefensible position.
Oh, you've made an impact, all right.
Everyone on this site is now
emphatically aware that you are a self-absorbed, judgmental, arrogant ninny.