I find Barack Obama (who, incidentally, is already older than JFK was when elected president) to be an incredibly articulate, passionate, thoughtful, honest, and appealing guy. Oops, I guess that disqualifies him right there.
Apparently I have to wait another 8 or 12 years--sufficient time for him to become cynical and corrupt enough to be an "experienced" politician--before he can be considered "electable" as president.
Meanwhile, Bush was somehow considered "presidential" enough to be elected twice (or, depending on your viewpoint, only once) because of his "experience" as one of the worst governors ever.
Am I missing something here?
Apparently I have to wait another 8 or 12 years--sufficient time for him to become cynical and corrupt enough to be an "experienced" politician--before he can be considered "electable" as president.
Meanwhile, Bush was somehow considered "presidential" enough to be elected twice (or, depending on your viewpoint, only once) because of his "experience" as one of the worst governors ever.
Am I missing something here?