D
deleted213967
Guest
Obama HAS a track record though. He's in the Illinois senate for 12 years before he ran for US Senator Clinton was JUST a Senator in 2000. Obama was in the Illinois Senate in 1996.
No offense but the friendly neighborhood legislature (even if it had been Kalifornia's) does not exactly carry the same weight as the mighty US Senate, hence the public's focus on the 3 candidates' stints there.
He has a LONGER political career than her. He didn't just pop out of the sky in 2004 when speaking for Senator Kerry. He's backed up things he has said, which is MORE than I can say for Hillary in New York. They HATE her.
Man, you can't have your cake "She was a bitchy housewife all along and gained no experience while baking fudgecake at the White House and the Governor's Mansion in Arkansas"
...and eat it too "She was the co-governor and the co-president ergo she is responsible for AIDS, the falling dollar, all TX executions, and Global Warming".
Please at least have the intellectual integrity to stick to one line of reasoning.
Hillary has no plans though...I guess this is what makes it hard for me to buy into the arguments that people have for Clinton. Everything is just against her.
So what was Barack Obama himself referring to in the televized debates when he stressed the similarities between the 2 plans, and the fact that his strength resided in his ability to sell the plan, not in the differences between his plan and hers?
...