A very good post. (Edit: Oops. After I had typed everything I just now noticed I quoted a different post than I meant to. I meant to quote the post in which you outlined the steps to improvement. That improvement steps post is actually the one I've responded to here).
That's great if it can be achieved. How often will that actually completely happen. How many can rise above. It sounds wonderful, but I suspect the number who do truly rise above to be few. I've only read some at measurection, so perhaps you have better insight into this than I do - how often have you read of successful mind reversal achieved? Even then it can come undone, as you also noted. One thing that has struck me as sort of odd is that penis enlargement isn't a much bigger topic at measurection than it is. I realise it comes up on occasion, but even then it's usually shot back down as the 'mind over matter' posts continue. SereneBlue brought up a very strong point about hardcore solution. Don't get me wrong, as I said, you presented a very good post, but I can't help but notice that penis enlargement is absent from it. I'm a member of a penis enlargement forum (and one should never try the exercises unless one is a member of a very good penis enlargement forum as it's dangerous without very thorough understanding). Perhaps you don't believe it's possible, as many don't. You don't strike me as someone who is easily brainwashed so I would be somewhat surprised if you have faithfully accepted mainstream's viewpoint that enlargement (aside from surgery) is impossible. Penis enlargement represents a solution for those that can't rise above the noise (or stay above the noise!). I'm not talking about surgery (which for many reasons is a last resort and we don't advocate it) and I'm not talking about those scam pills. Despite the coverage of your post, penis enlargement wasn't included just as measurection posts almost always leave it out. While mind over matter may indeed take the high road, penis enlargement is perhaps the more practical road.
Boy I'm busy on the board today! Wow, good conversation!
Well like I said these the baby steps right now. I devised that 5 step system listening to stories on the message board there at MR & in their chatroom. I'm constantly brainstorming trying to reinvent the wheel from scratch. A reason many things stay of a hamster wheel nature is because the right approach isn't taken. You might have to devise brand new strategems to orient your thinking in a new way. I go in assuming nothing's built and I am clear path making a new road. Pioneering. Uncharted territory to wagon train though.
ALSO in EACH one of the image issues I study I emphasize that what I'm proposing is not about changing your form. I don't want to put out the message "You're not good enough, change into something that is."
We get enough of that now which is why vanity plastic surgery is so prevalent. I actually began these studies in protest of plastic surgery. A view that I find now to be muted. I can't fight plastic surgery. Now I can only offer an alternative. I want people to find the value in their forms and beings AS IS and celebrate what these are. To constantly change into what someone else wants you to be will leave constantly at the whims of others. Mentalities must change yes but I don't want to put out that a person's physics have to be altered to gain acceptance.
And besides it's not like these guys can change what they have safely anyhow. Unlike in most instances these smaller guys cannot become bigger. It's harsh. Some would probably go that route but they really don't have the option to right now. So saying enlargement is just a painful thing to say. And who says they SHOULD change? All of this penis enlargement stuff in anecdotal and nobody seems to have come to a consensus on any step by step methods. Everybody has their opinion on what works and doesn't. Where confusion reigns, truth abstains. If this is made clear to be real and can gain substantial growth it will be one extra option some guys can take. When something has a concrete answer, a concrete methodology follows. Right now it's like religion. Everybody has their own take on it and not all the views coincide. I believe I believe!! Gotta keep it concrete, kid. Faith without results will chafe.
That option will always lurk over anyone with an issue. Change to fit the accepted standards. I want to create an alternative option which trumpets and promote the being as is to become accepted as is. Not a greater feeling in the world than to be loved and desired for EXACTLY who you are. Fat women are now showing their tummies and rolls not in shame but in glory because somebody likes those tummies and rolls.
MercedesBBW BBW SSBBW Big Tits Fat Butts Ass over 150 Models
Weclcome to Chickletsbbw.com!
Amazons stand tall and proud shouting to the rooftops their strength & height because someone likes that strength & height.
Amazon Goddess Mikayla Miles, strong & sexy
Home Page
So while changing can produce benefits, how can people get rewards by being themselves?
I'm still learning and devising new methods of working with the issues. But in penis realm stuff like:
Undoing mention of the word "average" as a descriptive of size replacing it with the more correct term "medium".
Proposing the devising of a new measuring scale using new Penile Units and Vaginal Units rather than the inefficient inch/centimeter scalethis scale used to determine degree of sensational difference in penetration that inches and centimeters are poorly devised to do (nobody remembers 1/2's 1/4's and 3/5's).
Taking this scale to devise an OBJECTIVE rather than subjective DEFINITIVE measure of size where this number is ALWAYS large and this number is ALWAYS small and this number is ALWAYS medium to avoid POV confusion and bias helping to give better information on how each size should approach the sex act.
Understanding, redefining and displaying the distinction between Love and Lust showing that LUST is fuel for overcoming a complex. Those desired feel less anxious about themselves. I have been verified on that point in particular by members of MR. To be wanted not just accepted. To be celebrated not just taken along passively or as if settled for.
To note the varied types of human-to-human relationships and the strength and duration of each with all the details. Parent-Child (strongest), Family/Friend/Enemy (next strongest), Lovers [which should be more appropriately called Lusters] (weakest). Understanding that in a "Lovers" relationship the only way to maintain decent duration is to have an overlapping Companion relationship along with it, "Companion" being another word for "Friend".
The 3 Billion Rule (more like 3.25 Billion now) which details mating chances for a person who thinks rejection is the end of the world. In a world of 6 Billion (6.5 Billion now) approximately half are women and half are men. For any heterosexual or homosexual this ensures 3 Billion+ chances to find a mate. For Bisexuals this is the 6 Billion Rule. No need for histrionics with so many choices available.
Those are just a few brainstorm sessions I came up with purely reading from the stories here and in many forums on different subjects pertaining to issues like these.
When the conversation keeps going A to B, A to B, I try to offset the hamster wheel by bringing in the C. A brand new point of view that no one quite has put together publicly. A new viewpoint that may help break the rut and pattern allowing a person to orient their thinking in a whole new way which as what knowledge tends to do brings confidence.
SereneBlue seems to be bothered by my wordiness and point of view. Well, I just got a lot to put down. Even as I write I am working out and brainstorming solutions smoothing out the rough edges in my theories and strategies. Like in school I'm just showing my work. Sorry for the windiness but some things can't be put down in bite size increments.
My root motivation for all of this is that I want people in this world to be able to better achieve happiness. With a world so much in strife and stress, when one is accepted, celebrated, and enjoyed that person has less want to destroy, to hurt, to lash out at the world. Idealistic, perhaps. But I sincerely believe that EVERYONE should have a place at the table. What the hell is the world for if some people are simply born to lose? Why contribute to a system that won't benefit you?
That line "Life Isn't Fair" simply doesn't wash with me. All of us are beneficiaries of people before us who challenged that maxim.
John Lucas